Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniform circular distortion gives planar quasiconformality by difference quotients

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let h:C→C be an orientation-preserving homeomorphism. For x∈C and r>0, put L(x,r)=max⁡∣y−x∣=r∣h(y)−h(x)∣ and l(x,r)=min⁡∣y−x∣=r∣h(y)−h(x)∣. Suppose L(x,r)≤Hl(x,r) for every x,r, with one fixed 1≤H<∞. Then h∈Wloc1,2, its continuous representative is ACL, and it is analytically H-quasiconformal: ∣hzˉ∣≤H−1H+1∣hz∣almost everywhere. For relatively compact open sets V⋐U⋐C, a coordinate unit vector ei and 0<∣t∣<dist⁡(V,∂U)/2, one has the explicit estimate ∫V∣h(x+tei)−h(x)t∣2 dx≤4H2area⁡(h(U)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the orientation-preserving plane homeomorphism and its uniform circular bound.

[A1]

Full AC supplies the Countable Choice and Dependent Choice used by the following measure and Sobolev interfaces. The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice

[F1]

Uniform coordinate difference quotients in L2(V) for V⋐U imply W1,2(V) regularity. The difference-quotient characterisation of W1,p for 1<p<∞

[F2]

Sobolev classes in W1,2 have ACL representatives whose line partial derivatives agree almost everywhere with their weak derivatives. The ACL characterisation of W1,p

[F3]

The independent general-homeomorphism argument in step 1.1 and the Remark of the quadrilateral supplier proves that a continuous planar homeomorphism with finite coordinate partial derivatives almost everywhere is totally differentiable almost everywhere. Its step 2.1 proves that at a nonsingular differentiability point an orientation-preserving homeomorphism has positive determinant, by the nonvanishing straight boundary homotopy to its linear derivative. These auxiliary interfaces assume AC but do not assume that this homeomorphism is already quasiconformal. Analytic quasiconformality gives both quadrilateral modulus bounds

[F4]

Tonelli applies to nonnegative measurable functions for sigma-finite completed-product measures. Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability

[F5]

For an orientation-preserving real-linear derivative with singular values s1≥s2>0, its Beltrami modulus is (s1−s2)/(s1+s2). A zero derivative satisfies every stated Beltrami inequality. The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions, The ACL and Sobolev analytic definition of quasiconformality

Proof

1.1A1givenalgebra

Define the locally finite Borel measure ω(E)=area⁡(h(E)). This is a measure because a homeomorphism maps disjoint Borel sets to disjoint Borel sets and respects unions. It is Radon because it is the pushforward of planar area by the homeomorphism h−1; compact and open approximation transport through that homeomorphism. The open image h(B(x,r)) contains B(h(x),l(x,r)): otherwise a segment from h(x) to a point of that smaller disk outside the image would first meet the boundary h(∂B(x,r)), contradicting the definition of l. The maximum distance from h(x) in h(B(x,r)‾) occurs on its boundary, because distance from a fixed point has no maximum in a nonempty open set. Hence ∣h(y)−h(x)∣≤L(x,r)≤Hl(x,r) for y∈B(x,r)‾, and πl(x,r)2≤ω(B(x,r)).

2.1A1F4step 1.1algebra

For x∈V and 0<∣t∣<dist⁡(V,∂U)/2, use step 1.1 with radius 2∣t∣ to obtain ∣h(x+tei)−h(x)∣2≤(H2/π)ω(B(x,2∣t∣)). These balls lie in U. Tonelli, applied to their incidence indicator, gives ∫Vω(B(x,2∣t∣)) dx=∫U∣V∩B(y,2∣t∣)∣ dω(y)≤4πt2ω(U). Combining the two inequalities proves the explicit difference-quotient estimate. All measures in this calculation are locally finite Radon measures and the incidence set is open, so no absolute continuity or null-set preservation of h has been presumed.

3.1A1F1F2F4step 2.1algebra

Continuity makes h square integrable on every relatively compact U. The uniform estimate in step 2.1 and [F1], with p=2 and complex-valued functions, give h∈W1,2(V). Exhausting the plane proves local Sobolev regularity. Apply [F2] on a countable collection of rectangles. On almost every coordinate line, its ACL representative agrees with the continuous representative almost everywhere by Fubini, hence everywhere on each compact line interval because both are continuous there. Thus the actual map h is ACL and has finite coordinate partial derivatives almost everywhere, agreeing with the weak derivatives.

4.1F3step 3.1givenalgebra

By the general-homeomorphism interface [F3], h is totally differentiable almost everywhere. At such a point x, write h(x+v)=h(x)+Av+o(∣v∣); the remainder is uniform over ∣v∣=r after division by r. If A has rank one, there are unit vectors u,v with Au=0 and ∣Av∣>0. Then l(x,r)=o(r) whereas L(x,r)≥r∣Av∣+o(r), contradicting the finite circular bound. If A is nonsingular with singular values s1≥s2>0, the same uniform expansion gives L(x,r)/r→s1 and l(x,r)/r→s2, so s1/s2≤H. Its determinant is positive by [F3], since h preserves orientation. The remaining possibility is A=0.

5.1F5step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

At almost every point the classical partials of the total derivative equal the weak derivatives by step 3.1. At the nonsingular points, [F5] and step 4.1 give ∣hzˉ∣/∣hz∣≤(H−1)/(H+1); at zero derivatives the asserted inequality also holds. Together with Wloc1,2 and ACL regularity, this is exactly analytic H-quasiconformality. The proof uses only the locally proved total-differentiability interface [F3]; it does not invoke an infinitesimal metric-to-quasiconformal criterion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

100 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources