How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Integral closure is unchanged across an integral intermediate domain
Statement
Let be domains and suppose that is integral over . Then for every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: domains with integral over , and an element .
An element of a commutative ring is integral over a subring exactly when is a root of a monic polynomial in (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).
is integral over when every element of is integral over , that is, when the inclusion is an integral ring map (Integral ring maps and integral extensions).
Let be commutative rings with . Then the elements of integral over form a subring of (Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring).
If and are integral ring maps of commutative rings, then the composite is integral (Integral extensions are transitive).
The rings are nonzero: an integral domain satisfies (Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with and no zero divisors).
Proof
Suppose first that is integral over . By [L1] there is a monic polynomial with . Since , the same polynomial, viewed in , is monic and has the same root ; by [L1] again, is integral over .
Conversely assume that is integral over . By [L1] there are an integer and coefficients with
Each lies in , and is integral over , so every is integral over by [L2]. Let be the subring of generated over by these coefficients. By [L3], applied to the ring extension (legitimate by [L5]), the elements of integral over form a subring of ; it contains and every , hence contains the subring these elements generate. Therefore the inclusion is an integral ring map.
The equation of step 1.2 has all its coefficients in , so by [L1] the element is integral over . Applying [L3] to the ring extension (again by [L5]) shows that the elements of integral over form a subring containing and , hence containing the subring that they generate; therefore the inclusion is an integral ring map.
By steps 2.1 and 3.1 the maps and are both integral, so the composite inclusion is integral by [L4]; every element of is thus integral over by [L2], and in particular is integral over . Together with step 1.1 this proves both directions of the equivalence.
Depends on
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Integral extensions are transitive
- Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers
- Integral ring maps and integral extensions
- Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring
- Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$ and no zero divisors
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Lemma 10.161.12 (Japanese rings) (standard reference, not scraped)