Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

BV Sobolev inequality in full space

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and let n≥2. Every u∈BV(Rn) satisfies ∥u∥Ln/(n−1)(Rn)≤TV(u;Rn).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, an integer n≥2, and u∈BV(Rn).

[A1]

Countable Choice is needed for the strict smooth approximation used below. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Every full-space BV function has a compactly supported smooth strict approximation converging in L1 and in gradient integral. (Strict smooth approximation in BV)

[F2]

The Loomis–Whitney integral inequality bounds the coordinate-product integral by the product of its (n−1)-dimensional integrals. (Loomis–Whitney integral inequality)

[F3]

For a smooth function with continuous derivative, the one-dimensional fundamental theorem gives its value from the integral of its derivative along each coordinate line. (Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves)

[F4]

Tonelli allows the coordinate-line integrals to be assembled into the full-space integrals below. (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product)

Proof

Given: The hypotheses listed above.

1.1F3F4givenalgebra

First let f∈Cc∞(Rn). For each i, put gi(xi^):=∫R∣∂if(x1,…,xi−1,s,xi+1,…,xn)∣ ds. Tonelli [F4] shows gi is nonnegative measurable and integrable. By [F3], integrating from a point to the left of the compact support up to xi gives ∣f(x)∣≤gi(xi^) for every coordinate i. Multiplication and raising to the power 1/(n−1) yield ∣f(x)∣n/(n−1)≤∏i=1ngi(xi^)1/(n−1).

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Integrating this inequality and applying [F2] gives ∥f∥Ln/(n−1)≤∏i=1n∥∂if∥11/n≤1n∑i=1n∥∂if∥1≤1n∫Rn∣∇f∣ dx. The middle inequality is arithmetic-geometric mean; the last follows pointwise from ∑i∣∂if∣≤n∣∇f∣. Thus the desired inequality holds for smooth compactly supported f, with the stronger constant 1/n.

3.1A1F1F4step 2.1choose∎

By [A1] and [F1], choose fk∈Cc∞(Rn) with fk→u in L1 and ∫∣∇fk∣→TV(u;Rn). Select a subsequence with ∥fkj−u∥1<2−2j; Tonelli [F4] gives ∫∑j∣fkj−u∣<∞, hence fkj→u almost everywhere. Fatou and step 2.1 imply ∫∣u∣n/(n−1) dx≤lim inf⁡j∫∣fkj∣n/(n−1) dx≤TV(u;Rn)n/(n−1). Taking the (n−1)/n power proves the stated inequality and at the same time shows u∈Ln/(n−1).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources