How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
BV Sobolev inequality in full space
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and let . Every satisfies
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, an integer , and .
Countable Choice is needed for the strict smooth approximation used below. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Every full-space BV function has a compactly supported smooth strict approximation converging in and in gradient integral. (Strict smooth approximation in BV)
The Loomis–Whitney integral inequality bounds the coordinate-product integral by the product of its -dimensional integrals. (Loomis–Whitney integral inequality)
For a smooth function with continuous derivative, the one-dimensional fundamental theorem gives its value from the integral of its derivative along each coordinate line. (Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves)
Tonelli allows the coordinate-line integrals to be assembled into the full-space integrals below. (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product)
Proof
Given: The hypotheses listed above.
First let . For each , put Tonelli [F4] shows is nonnegative measurable and integrable. By [F3], integrating from a point to the left of the compact support up to gives for every coordinate . Multiplication and raising to the power yield
Integrating this inequality and applying [F2] gives The middle inequality is arithmetic-geometric mean; the last follows pointwise from . Thus the desired inequality holds for smooth compactly supported , with the stronger constant .
By [A1] and [F1], choose with in and . Select a subsequence with ; Tonelli [F4] gives , hence almost everywhere. Fatou and step 2.1 imply Taking the power proves the stated inequality and at the same time shows .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Spatial BV and distributional total variation
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- The function space $\mathcal{L}^p(\mu)$ for $0 < p < \infty$
- Strict smooth approximation in BV
- Loomis–Whitney integral inequality
- Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gláucio Terra, Introduction to Geometric Measure Theory — Lecture Notes, version 1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Piotr Rybka, The space in variational and evolution problems — Lecture Notes in Mathematical Sciences 15 (standard reference, not scraped)