How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
BV extension and translation bounds
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a bounded Lipschitz domain, meaning a bounded open set whose boundary has a finite cover by Lipschitz graph neighborhoods with on one side of each graph. The zero-extension map is bounded from to , with support in , and there is a finite such that for every . For every and ,
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, a bounded Lipschitz domain , , , and .
The trace result gives a zero extension in with variation bounded by . (Trace formula and bounded zero extension on Lipschitz domains)
Under Countable Choice, full-space BV functions admit compactly supported smooth strict approximations. (Strict smooth approximation in BV)
Translations preserve Lebesgue measure and the norm. (Translation of a function on , Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation)
A differentiable function with continuous derivative satisfies the one-dimensional fundamental theorem of calculus along compact intervals. (Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves)
Nonnegative integrands may be integrated by iterated integration. (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product)
Countable Choice is assumed for full-space strict approximation. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Proof
Given: Countable Choice, , , and .
The zero extension is in by [F1]. Its norm equals , and [F1] bounds its full-space variation by ; its support is contained in by definition.
Let first . The fundamental theorem [F4] along the segment from to gives . Integrate the absolute value in , apply Tonelli [F5], and use translation invariance [F3] to obtain
For general , choose with in and by [F2] under [A1]. Translation is an isometry [F3], so in . Passing to the limit in step 1.2 proves the translation inequality.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Spatial BV and distributional total variation
- Translation of a function on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves
- Trace formula and bounded zero extension on Lipschitz domains
- Strict smooth approximation in BV
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gláucio Terra, Introduction to Geometric Measure Theory — Lecture Notes, version 1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Piotr Rybka, The space in variational and evolution problems — Lecture Notes in Mathematical Sciences 15 (standard reference, not scraped)