Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Centered NtD data control the exact CGO identity with its modulation factor

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let Ω=B1⊂R3, and let σj=1+aj be positive real conductivities with aj supported in Bρ‾, ∥aj∥Hs≤A, 5/2<s<7/2, 0<ρ<1, and m≤σj≤M, for fixed positive bounds. Put gj=σj, qj=gj−1Δgj, Q=q1−q2, and N=∥Q∥H−1/2(R3). Let Nj be the boundary-mean-zero Neumann-to-Dirichlet map for σj on L02(S2), and define the actual data difference by the centered voltage sequences δ=(∑ℓ≥1∑k=12ℓ+1∥(N1−N2)Yℓk∥L2(S2)2)1/2. This quantity is finite. If Uj=eiζj⋅x(1+rj) are the solutions from the positive-Sobolev CGO lemma, then ∫ΩQU1U2 dx=∫S2f1(N2−N1)f2 dS,fj=∂νUj∣S2, and the fluxes fj have mean zero. The boundary pairing is bilinear, without complex conjugation. In particular, there are C,T>0 depending only on the fixed class such that for t≥T and ∣ξ∣≤t one can choose null phases with ζ1+ζ2=−ξ, ∣ζj∣=2t, and obtain the rigorous estimate ∣Q^(ξ)∣≤CδeCt+C⟨ξ⟩1/2t−1N. The factor ⟨ξ⟩1/2 is part of this conclusion; this lemma does not assert the sharper stability estimate that would follow from dropping it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The choice assumptions, conductivity class, potentials, data norm and CGO solutions in the Statement.

[F1]

The centered voltage sequences are square summable, and the boundary-mean-zero variational Neumann solutions obey uniform H1 energy estimates. Centered Neumann voltage sequences on the three-dimensional ball

[F2]

The potentials belong uniformly to Hs−2 and have compact support in Bρ‾; the conductivities and their square roots and inverses have uniformly bounded C1 norms. Collared Sobolev conductivities have regular Liouville potentials and H1 recovery

[F3]

The CGO remainders have H1/2 norm O(t−1), uniformly bounded L∞ norm, and H2 norm O(t) on B2. Positive-Sobolev CGO remainders from a shifted Fourier lattice

[F4]

The boundary trace is bounded from H1(B1) into L2(S2). Boundary trace quotient and chart norm equivalence

[F5]

The divergence theorem on a bounded C1 domain gives Green's identity for smooth functions; the complex bilinear form follows by real and imaginary parts. Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain

[F6]

Ambient smooth restrictions are dense in H2(B1), so Green identities for smooth approximants pass to the H2 CGO solutions using the trace bound [F4]. Ambient smooth restrictions are dense on bounded C^k domains

[F7]

Tonelli's theorem permits interchanging the nonnegative Fourier integrals in the fractional difference identity below. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[F8]

Compactly supported Sobolev classes extend by zero with their weak derivatives unchanged. Compactly supported Sobolev functions extend by zero in every integer order

Proof

1.1A1F1F4givenalgebra

The energy argument in [F1] applies to every mean-zero f∈L2(S2): the functional v↦∫fTr⁡v‾ is bounded on the boundary-mean-zero H1 subspace by [F4], and its uniformly coercive conductivity form has a unique solution with norm at most C∥f∥2. This defines a bounded map Nj:L02→L02. Its centered sequence columns are those in [F1], so their difference has finite squared sum. For a finite current expansion f=∑cℓkYℓk, Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∥(N1−N2)f∥2≤δ(∑∣cℓk∣2)1/2. Density and boundedness extend this to every f∈L02. Finally the bilinear symmetry ∫fNjh=∫hNjf follows by testing the two weak equations against one another, using real coefficients and complex bilinear extension.

2.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

Put uj=Uj/gj. The weak Liouville identity gives div⁡(σj∇uj)=0: expand σj∇(Uj/gj)=gj∇Uj−Uj∇gj, whose divergence is gjΔUj−UjΔgj=0. Products are legitimate by [F2]–[F3]; one may also verify the equality first on smooth approximations and pass in distributions. Since gj=1 on a full collar of S2, the boundary normal flux of uj is exactly fj=∂νUj. It belongs to L2 because Uj∈H2(B2) and [F4] applies to each first derivative. The divergence theorem [F5] gives the Green identity for smooth approximants; density [F6] and trace continuity [F4] pass it to the H2 CGO solutions on B1. On the collar Uj is harmonic and the coefficient is identically one. Taking the test function one shows ∫fj=0. Thus Tr⁡uj=Njfj+cj for a constant cj.

3.1A1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Subtract the two bilinear Schrödinger Green identities [F5]–[F6], testing the j=1 equation against U2 and the j=2 equation against U1. Their gradient terms cancel, giving ∫QU1U2=∫S2(f1Tr⁡U2−f2Tr⁡U1). Since Uj=uj on the boundary, step 2.1 identifies these traces with Njfj+cj. The constant terms disappear because the fluxes have mean zero; the symmetry from step 1.1 gives exactly the displayed centered NtD identity. All volume terms are integrable since Q∈L2 and Uj∈H2(B2)⊂L∞(B1); boundedness follows, for example, by weighted Fourier Cauchy–Schwarz after multiplication by an interior cutoff.

4.1F3F4step 1.1step 3.1algebra

If ∣ζj∣=2t, [F3] and differentiation of the exponential give ∥Uj∥H2(B1)≤CeCtt3 for t≥T. The trace bound on first derivatives then gives ∥fj∥2≤CeCt, increasing C to absorb the polynomial. The operator-norm bound in step 1.1 and Cauchy–Schwarz in the bilinear boundary pairing yield ∣∫QU1U2∣≤CδeCt.

5.1A1F2F3F6F7F8step 4.1choosealgebra

For smooth compactly supported w put [w]1/22:=∬∣w(x)−w(y)∣2∣x−y∣−4 dx dy. Translation, Plancherel and Tonelli [F7] give [w]1/22=∫∣w^(ξ)∣2(∫∣eiξ⋅h−1∣2∣h∣4 dh)dξ=c3∫∣ξ∣∣w^(ξ)∣2dξ, where rotation and dilation give the inner integral, and 0<c3<∞ follows from ∣eiu−1∣≤min⁡{2,∣u∣}. Thus ∥w∥H1/22≍∥w∥22+[w]1/22. Restrict each H2(B2) remainder to B1 and use [F6] to approximate it there by ambient smooth functions; multiplication by a cutoff supported in B1 and [F8] extend the products to H2(R3), so the norm comparison extends to these cutoff remainders. For bounded compactly supported factors the identity f(x)g(x)−f(y)g(y)=f(x)(g(x)−g(y))+g(y)(f(x)−f(y)) then yields ∥fg∥H1/2≤C(∥f∥∞∥g∥H1/2+∥g∥∞∥f∥H1/2). For ξ≠0, choose real orthonormal d1,d2 perpendicular to ξ and set ζ1=−ξ/2+t2−∣ξ∣2/4 d2+itd1, ζ2=−ξ/2−t2−∣ξ∣2/4 d2−itd1; for ξ=0 choose any orthonormal pair. Direct expansion gives ζj⋅ζj=0, ζ1+ζ2=−ξ and ∣ζj∣=2t. Hence U1U2=e−iξ⋅x(1+r1+r2+r1r2). Choose cutoffs χ,η∈Cc∞(B1) with χ=1 on Bρ and η=1 on supp⁡χ. Applying the product estimate to χrj and ηrj, and [F3], gives ∥χ(r1+r2+r1r2)∥H1/2(R3)≤C/t. Fourier translation and ⟨η+ξ⟩≤2⟨η⟩⟨ξ⟩ then give ∥e−iξ⋅xχ(r1+r2+r1r2)∥H1/2≤C⟨ξ⟩1/2/t.

6.1F2step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

Extract the Fourier coefficient of Q from the exact product identity in step 5.1. Its remainder is precisely the signed pairing of Q with e−iξ⋅xχ(r1+r2+r1r2), not with the unmodulated remainder. Weighted Fourier Cauchy–Schwarz bounds its absolute value by CN⟨ξ⟩1/2/t. Combine this with step 4.1 and absorb the fixed unitary Fourier factor (2π)−3/2 into C. This proves the stated estimate with its modulation factor retained.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources