How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
H1 logarithmic stability from centered three-dimensional NtD data
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Fix , , and . Let be real conductivities on , with supported in , , and , for . Let be their boundary-mean-zero NtD maps on , and let Then there is depending only on such that If , the conductivities are equal. The zero-noise modulus is therefore defined to be zero. Restricting the left side to gives the same norm because the difference is supported in .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The choice assumptions and fixed collared Sobolev conductivity class in the Statement.
With and , one has , and . Collared Sobolev conductivities have regular Liouville potentials and H1 recovery
The exact centered NtD/CGO identity has boundary term at most . For each , its remaining Fourier term is the bilinear pairing of with a cutoff remainder of norm at most , uniformly in phase direction. Centered NtD data control the exact CGO identity with its modulation factor
For every , . Sharp weighted absorption of modulated CGO remainders
All choice assumptions are retained from the actual suppliers [F1]–[F3]. The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain
Proof
Put and . For , the high-frequency contribution satisfies . Indeed the ratio of the two Fourier weights is .
For , [F2] gives the pointwise inequality for . The right side is measurable by the nonnegative Fourier integral in [F3]; thus this inequality can be integrated without selecting a measurable family of CGO phases. Square it using , multiply by and integrate. Since , [F3] yields a low-frequency bound , after increasing the exponential constant. Combining with step 1.1 gives . This uses the integrated modulated estimate, not an unmodulated pointwise Sobolev pairing.
Choose a fixed large enough that for the last constant in step 2.1, and set . Absorb that term into the left side and take square roots. Increasing fixed constants and using for gives for some depending only on the fixed class. If , let to obtain . If , take . Then , which is bounded by a constant times because is bounded for . Hence for all sufficiently small positive .
By [F1] and the Fourier weight inequality, . This proves the claimed small-noise rate and, if , equality of the conductivities. For larger positive , the uniform bound and the positive lower bound for on that region prove the same displayed estimate after increasing . On a sufficiently small noise interval, is comparable to , so the two small-noise formulations agree. All constants came from the fixed class.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Collared Sobolev conductivities have regular Liouville potentials and H1 recovery
- Centered NtD data control the exact CGO identity with its modulation factor
- Sharp weighted absorption of modulated CGO remainders
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Frederic Weidling, Variational Source Conditions and Conditional Stability Estimates for Inverse Problems in PDEs (standard reference, not scraped)