Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Third linearization identity for the cubic Dirichlet-to-Neumann map

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice.

Let (M,g) be a compact smooth Riemannian domain with nonempty smooth boundary and with every connected component meeting the boundary, let q∈C∞(M,R), and fix smooth boundary directions h1,h2,h3,h4. For ϵ=(ϵ1,ϵ2,ϵ3) near zero, let uϵ be the unique small solution of −Δgu+qu3=0 with boundary value ϵ1h1+ϵ2h2+ϵ3h3, and set N(ϵ)=∂νoutuϵ∣∂M. Let vj be the harmonic solution with boundary value hj. If w123=∂ϵ1∂ϵ2∂ϵ3uϵ∣ϵ=0, where uϵ has boundary value ϵ1h1+ϵ2h2+ϵ3h3, then −Δgw123+6qv1v2v3=0,w123∣∂M=0, and ∫∂M∂ϵ1∂ϵ2∂ϵ3N(ϵ)∣ϵ=0h4‾ dSg=6∫Mq v1v2v3v4‾ dVg.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the small-data differentiability supplier [F1] and nonresonant regularity supplier [F2].

[A2]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) is inherited from the small-data differentiability supplier [F1] and nonresonant regularity supplier [F2].

Given: the data in the statement and the finite-parameter solution family from the small-data lemma.

[F1]

Small-data solvability and third differentiability of the cubic DN map: for every finite list of smooth boundary directions, the small solution and nonlinear DN data depend C3 on the real parameters ϵj.

[F2]

Smooth-manifold elliptic nonresonant solvability and regularity: the zero-Dirichlet Laplacian has a unique weak inverse and smooth data yield smooth solutions.

[F3]

Scalar conductivity and Schrödinger Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps: the smooth Schrödinger DN convention is the outward normal derivative, and the boundary pairing is linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second.

[F4]

Riemannian volume density and Laplace–Beltrami operator as the trace of the Hessian: integration by parts for Δg is performed with the positive density dVg and outward boundary density dSg.

[F5]

The Gauss-Green integration-by-parts formula with Sobolev traces: on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain of dimension at least two, integration by parts for smooth functions has the outward-normal boundary term; the Riemannian identity in these dimensions follows chartwise from the coordinate divergence formula and positive volume density. The one-dimensional identity is proved directly in step 3.1.

Proof

Given: the data in the statement.

1.1A1A2F1F2givenalgebra

Differentiate −Δguϵ+quϵ3=0 once in ϵj at ϵ=0. Since u0=0, the derivative vj=∂ϵjuϵ∣0 solves −Δgvj=0 with trace hj. Differentiating twice in distinct parameters gives −Δg(∂ϵi∂ϵjuϵ∣0)=0 with zero trace, so this second derivative vanishes by [F2].

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

The third mixed derivative of uϵ3 at zero has exactly the six permutations of v1v2v3, hence equals 6v1v2v3; all other chain-rule terms contain u0 or one of the vanishing second derivatives from step 1.1. Differentiating the equation gives −Δgw123+6qv1v2v3=0, with zero boundary trace. By [F1], the third derivative of the nonlinear DN data is ∂νoutw123∣∂M.

3.1F2F3F4F5step 2.1algebra

The harmonic fields and w123 are smooth by [F2], since their boundary data and the forcing −6qv1v2v3 are smooth. Since v4 is harmonic and w123 has zero trace, Green's formula gives ∫∂M(∂νoutw123)h4‾ dSg=∫M(Δgw123)v4‾ dVg. Indeed, the second Green identity has boundary term w123∂νv4‾ equal to zero, and interior term w123Δgv4‾=0. For dimension at least two, in each boundary chart write Δgw=∣g∣−1/2∂i(∣g∣1/2gij∂jw) and apply [F5] to the coordinate components; summing with the finite partition leaves the displayed Riemannian boundary integral by [F4]. In dimension one, use arclength coordinates t and integrate ddt(w123v4′‾−w123′v4‾)=w123v4′′‾−w123′′v4‾ by the fundamental theorem of calculus. Finite chart localization cancels interior endpoint and cutoff terms. At a physical left endpoint ∂νout=−∂t, at a right endpoint ∂νout=∂t, and dSg is counting density. Using w123=0 at those endpoints and v4′′=0 gives exactly the same displayed identity.

4.1F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

The equation in step 2.1 gives Δgw123=6qv1v2v3. Substituting this into step 3.1 and using the definition of the third DN derivative proves the displayed identity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources