Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Small-data solvability and third differentiability of the cubic DN map

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice.

Let (M,g) be a compact smooth Riemannian domain of dimension n≥1 with smooth nonempty boundary, assume every connected component of M meets the boundary, and let q∈C∞(M,R). Fix an integer s>n/2+2 and a finite family h1,…,hm∈C∞(∂M,C). For ϵ=(ϵ1,…,ϵm)∈Rm sufficiently near zero, the equation −Δgu+qu3=0in M∘,u∣∂M=∑j=1mϵjhj has a unique solution in a fixed small Hs(M) ball. The parameter map ϵ↦uϵ is C3 into Hs(M), and the corresponding nonlinear Dirichlet-to-Neumann data ∂νoutuϵ∣∂M is C3 into C0(∂M). For each such finite family, write Nq;h1,…,hm(ϵ)=∂νoutuϵ∣∂M for this parameterized data map.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed by the Sobolev algebra, embedding, and Banach implicit-function suppliers [F4]--[F6].

[A2]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) is assumed by the Sobolev and elliptic regularity interfaces [F1], [F3].

Given: the compact smooth Riemannian domain, real smooth q, integer s>n/2+2, and the fixed finite smooth boundary directions.

[F1]

Sobolev spaces on a compact Riemannian domain with boundary: the chartwise integer Sobolev spaces are Banach spaces, and H01(M) is the H1 closure of interior compactly supported smooth functions. Since Hs(M)↪H1(M) continuously, Xs=Hs(M)∩H01(M) is closed in Hs(M).

[F2]

Weak solvability of the positive scalar conductivity equation: on each compact connected component with nonempty boundary, ∥w∥L2≤CP,j∥∇w∥L2 for zero-trace w. Compactness and local connectedness give finitely many components, so the maximum of these constants gives the inequality on M.

[F3]

Smooth-manifold elliptic nonresonant solvability and regularity: once the weak Dirichlet kernel is trivial, −Δg has a unique zero-boundary solution for every forcing F∈L2(M). For integer k≥0 and arbitrary F∈Hk(M), that solution belongs to Hk+2(M) with ∥u∥Hk+2≤Ck∥F∥Hk; no trace condition is imposed on F.

[F4]

For n≥2, The Sobolev space Wk,p is an algebra above the critical index gives the Banach-algebra bound for integer s with 2s>n on bounded smooth chart domains; finite localization gives it on M. For n=1, the one-dimensional fundamental theorem of calculus gives ∥z∥L∞≤C∥z∥H1 on bounded intervals. Apply this to derivatives through order s−1 and use the product rule to bound each derivative of uv through order s in L2; this gives the same algebra bound on each chart and hence on M.

[F5]

For n≥2, Higher-order Sobolev embedding gives Hs↪C2(M‾) when s>n/2+2. For n=1, s≥3; apply the one-dimensional H1↪C0 estimate to derivatives through order two.

[F6]

Implicit function theorem for Banach spaces: if a C3 map between Banach spaces vanishes at a point and its derivative in the unknown variable is a bounded isomorphism, its nearby zero set is the graph of a unique C3 map.

[F7]

Collar neighborhood theorem: boundary data on a compact smooth boundary extend smoothly into a collar by constant normal extension followed by a smooth cutoff and finite patching.

[F8]

In boundary charts, the g-orthogonal complement of T∂M is a smooth line bundle, and the outward choice defines a smooth unit normal. Thus u↦g(∇gu,νout)∣∂M is bounded from C1(M‾) to C0(∂M).

Proof

Given: the data in the statement.

1.1A2F1F2F3givenalgebra

For q=0, the Dirichlet kernel of −Δg is trivial: if w∈H01(M) is weakly harmonic, testing with w gives ∫M∣∇w∣2dVg=0, and the zero-trace Poincare inequality in [F2] gives w=0. Thus [F3] supplies the zero-boundary inverse G=(−Δg)−1:Hs−2(M)→Xs, where Xs={w∈Hs(M):w∈H01(M)}. The high-order estimate in [F3], together with its bounded H1 inverse, makes G bounded.

1.2A1A2F1F2F3F4F6F7givenconstruct

Regard the complex Sobolev spaces as real Banach spaces, since the parameters are real. For n≥2, [F4] and localization to the fixed finite atlas make Hs(M) a Banach algebra. If n=1, then s≥3; the one-dimensional estimate H1↪L∞ and the Leibniz rule give the same algebra bound in each chart, hence on M. Thus (ϵ,w)↦q(Efϵ+w)3 is a continuous polynomial from Rm×Xs into Hs−2(M), where fϵ=∑jϵjhj and Efϵ is the smooth collar extension from [F7]. Define F(ϵ,w)=w−G[Δg(Efϵ)−q(Efϵ+w)3]∈Xs. It is C3 (indeed polynomial plus bounded linear maps) and F(0,0)=0.

2.1A1F6step 1.2algebra

At (0,0), the derivative DwF(0,0) is the identity on Xs, because the derivative of u↦qu3 at u=0 vanishes. By [F6], there is a neighborhood of ϵ=0 and a unique C3 map w(ϵ)∈Xs near zero such that F(ϵ,w(ϵ))=0. The fixed-point equation is exactly −Δg(Efϵ+w)+q(Efϵ+w)3=0 with boundary trace fϵ, so uϵ=Efϵ+w(ϵ) gives the unique small solution.

3.1A1F5F8step 2.1algebra∎

For n≥2, [F5] gives Hs(M)↪C2(M‾); for n=1, s≥3 gives the same embedding by the one-dimensional Sobolev estimate. By [F8], u↦∂νoutu∣∂M is bounded from C1(M‾) to C0(∂M). Composing it with the C3 parameter map proves the asserted C3 dependence of Nq;h1,…,hm.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources