Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Euclidean trace quotient is the fixed-atlas H1/2 boundary space

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let n≥2, let Ω⊂Rn be a bounded connected domain with smooth nonempty boundary, and regard Ω‾ as a compact smooth manifold with the Euclidean metric. Write HE1(Ω)=W1,2(Ω;R) and let H0,E1(Ω) be the closure of Cc∞(Ω;R) in that norm; put BE:=HE1(Ω)/H0,E1(Ω). Let Hfix1(Ω‾) and H0,fix1(Ω‾) be the fixed-atlas spaces on Ω‾ and let Hfix1/2(∂Ω) be the fixed-atlas boundary space using localized Euclidean W1/2,2 norms. The identity on smooth functions extends to bounded linear isomorphisms between HE1(Ω) and Hfix1(Ω‾), and between their zero-boundary subspaces. Classical boundary restriction extends to a bounded linear trace T:Hfix1(Ω‾)→Hfix1/2(∂Ω) with kernel H0,fix1(Ω‾). The induced quotient map is a bounded linear isomorphism

HE1(Ω)/H0,E1(Ω)  ≅  Hfix1(Ω‾)/H0,fix1(Ω‾)  ≅  Hfix1/2(∂Ω).

Thus the Euclidean trace quotient and the fixed-atlas H1/2 boundary space are canonically equivalent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice; the bounded connected smooth Euclidean domain and fixed-atlas conventions in the statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

Hfix1 is the completion of smooth functions in the fixed finite chartwise W1,2 norm; H0,fix1 is the closure of interior compactly supported smooth functions; Hfix1/2 is the fixed finite sum of localized Euclidean W1/2,2 boundary norms. (Sobolev spaces on a compact Riemannian domain with boundary)

[F2]

The compact-boundary fractional space consists of L2 classes with finite chartwise Slobodeckij norm, and different finite atlases and subordinate partitions give equivalent norms. (The fractional Sobolev space on a compact C1 boundary, Chart independence of the fractional boundary norm)

[F3]

Smooth flattening-chart compositions and multiplication by the fixed smooth cutoffs are bounded in W1,2; restrictions of ambient smooth functions are dense in Euclidean W1,2(Ω), which is complete. (C^k boundary flattening preserves local W^{k,p}, Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor, Ambient smooth restrictions are dense on bounded C^k domains, Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach)

[F4]

For p=2, the half-space trace extends classical restriction to a bounded map W1,2(R+n)→W1/2,2(Rn−1). (The half-space trace lies in the fractional Slobodeckij space)

[F5]

The usual trace from Euclidean H1(Ω) to L2(∂Ω) is bounded and agrees with classical restriction on continuous Sobolev functions. (The Lp trace operator on a bounded C1 domain)

[F6]

The kernel of that L2 trace is exactly the Euclidean H1-closure of Cc∞(Ω), namely H0,E1(Ω). (The kernel of the trace is the closure of the test functions, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure)

[F7]

For a bounded smooth Euclidean domain, the L2 trace has a bounded right inverse from the compact-boundary W1/2,2 space to Euclidean H1(Ω). (A bounded right inverse of the trace, supported in a prescribed collar)

Proof

1.1A1A2F1F3construct

On the common smooth core, the identity between the fixed-atlas and Euclidean W1,2 norms is bounded in both directions. Indeed, each fixed chart representative is obtained by multiplying by a fixed smooth cutoff and composing with a smooth flattening chart, so [F3] bounds the finite fixed-atlas sum by the Euclidean norm. Conversely, the finite partition of unity writes u as the sum of its localized chart pieces; pull each piece back and use [F3] to bound the Euclidean W1,2 norm by the fixed-atlas sum. The constants are finite because the atlas and partition are finite. By the density and completeness in [F3], the identity extends to bounded inverse maps on the completions. Since the two norms are equivalent on Cc∞(Ω), their closures give the same zero-boundary subspace.

2.1A1A2F1F2F4F5step 1.1construct

For u∈Hfix1, take its localized boundary-chart representatives in the fixed-atlas definition. Apply [F4] to each representative (reflecting t<0 to t>0 when required), and sum the finitely many resulting local traces. The fixed-atlas norm [F1] gives a bounded map T:Hfix1→Hfix1/2. For smooth u this sum is the classical boundary restriction because the partition equals one near the boundary and the half-space traces agree with classical restriction. As an L2-valued map, this trace agrees with the Euclidean trace [F5]: the maps are bounded into L2 by [F2] and [F5], and the Euclidean and fixed H1 norms are equivalent by step 1.1, so equality on the dense smooth core extends to all of H1.

3.1A1A2F1F2F6step 1.1step 2.1given

If Tu=0 in Hfix1/2, it is zero as an L2 class by [F2]; the L2 trace agreement of step 2.1 and [F6] imply u∈H0,E1. Step 1.1 identifies this with H0,fix1. Conversely, if u∈H0,fix1, approximate it in the fixed H1 norm by interior compactly supported smooth functions. Each has zero classical trace, so continuity of T gives Tu=0. Therefore ker⁡T=H0,fix1.

4.1A1A2F1F2F7step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1construct∎

By [F7] and the boundary-norm equivalence [F2], the Euclidean L2 trace has a bounded right inverse R:Hfix1/2(∂Ω)→HE1(Ω). The norm equivalence of step 1.1 makes R bounded into Hfix1 as well. For every boundary class f, the Euclidean trace of Rf is f; by step 2.1 the fixed trace agrees with it in L2, hence as an Hfix1/2 class. So T is onto. The kernel identity of step 3.1 induces a bounded bijection Tˉ:Hfix1/H0,fix1→Hfix1/2. For any representative u+v with v∈H0,fix1, step 2.1 gives ∥Tu∥H1/2≤C∥u+v∥Hfix1; taking the infimum shows Tˉ is bounded. Also ∥Tˉ−1f∥≤∥Rf∥Hfix1≤CR∥f∥H1/2, so its inverse is bounded. Composing with the quotient identity isomorphism of step 1.1 proves the asserted Euclidean quotient identification.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

80 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources