How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kernel tail integrals of weighted L-p functions are finite
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , (Muckenhoupt A_p and A_1 weights), and let be measurable and satisfy the pointwise size bound for . Then for every , every and every , a finite bound depending only on the stated data and on the cube . Consequently the truncated singular integrals and (Maximal truncated singular integrals) are defined at every point by absolutely convergent integrals, and they are Borel measurable functions of the centre .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , the size bound , , and .
Write for and . Weighted average comparison: for every cube and nonnegative measurable , , so (Weighted average comparison and the density-to-mass estimate for A_p weights).
Power decay: since (The Muckenhoupt A_infinity class), there are , depending only on and the data of a witnessing exponent, with for measurable (A_infinity weights satisfy power decay).
is a locally finite measure and for every cube (Weights, their associated measures, and the spaces L^p(w), Muckenhoupt A_p and A_1 weights).
Monotone convergence passes through increasing nonnegative sums (Monotone convergence for the integral). For a jointly measurable nonnegative integrand, the integral over a product space may be computed by iterated integrals (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product), and (Weights, their associated measures, and the spaces L^p(w)).
Translations are norm-continuous in complex (Complex translation, convolution, approximate identities, and mollification); dominated convergence applies under an integrable majorant (Dominated convergence).
Proof
Cover by the annuli , , which are pairwise disjoint with union and each contained in the ball after the substitution . Hence by monotone convergence and monotonicity of the integral.
For each put and . By [F1], , while is a dimensional constant. By [F2] applied to , , so .
Substituting the bounds of step 1.2 into step 1.1 gives , and the geometric series converges because ; this is the asserted finite bound with .
The estimate proves absolute convergence of every truncation. For fixed , the annular kernel is bounded and compactly supported. Near a fixed , truncate to a bounded ball containing all arguments under consideration, obtaining an function . Then by [F5]. Thus each finite truncation is continuous and Borel. Dominated convergence gives , which is Borel. Continuity of the defining integrals in the cutoff radii follows from absolute integrability and null spherical boundaries, so rational cutoffs suffice in both maximal suprema; these maximal functions are Borel as well.
Depends on
- Weighted average comparison and the density-to-mass estimate for A_p weights
- A_infinity weights satisfy power decay
- The Muckenhoupt A_infinity class
- Weights, their associated measures, and the spaces L^p(w)
- Muckenhoupt A_p and A_1 weights
- Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm
- Maximal truncated singular integrals
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Complex translation, convolution, approximate identities, and mollification
- Dominated convergence
- Monotone convergence for the integral
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
81 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (Springer GTM 249, 2014) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Juha Kinnunen, Harmonic Analysis (Aalto University lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)