Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Hilbert lift induces the localized Wasserstein continuity equation

Statement

Assume AC and the feature-measure energy hypotheses. Let μ0∈P2(Ω) have finite energy and be concentrated on Qr, and let X:[0,∞)→K=L2(μ0;Rd) be the Hilbert gradient flow of the localized lift Er from X(0,s)=s. Define μt=(X(t,⋅))#μ0, mt=∫Φ(X(t,s))dμ0(s), and vt(u)=−S(∇R(mt),u), where S(a,u) is the minimum-norm element of the full shifted set dΦu∗a+∂λV(V+ιQr)(u) for u∈Qr, and extend vt by 0 for u∉Qr. Then v is Borel, ∫0T∫∣vt∣2dμtdt<∞ for each T<∞, and ∂tμt+∇⋅(vtμt)=0 in distributions on (0,T)×Rd. The curve μt is in AC2([0,T];P2(Rd),W2), and v is the minimum-action velocity, satisfying ∫0T∫∣vt∣2dμtdt=∫0T∣μ˙t∣W22dt.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the localized lift, the initial law, and its Hilbert gradient flow.

[F1]

The Hilbert flow is locally absolutely continuous, has a Bochner derivative, and its derivative is the negative Hilbert subgradient almost everywhere. A lower-bounded semiconvex Hilbert energy generates a unique gradient flow

[F2]

The Hilbert subdifferential is the smooth feature gradient plus the measurable pointwise constrained potential subgradient. The localized lifted subdifferential is a pointwise constrained subdifferential

[F3]

Bochner paths have strongly measurable representatives and their integrals commute with bounded linear functionals. Finite partition energy yields Hilbert-valued AC2 paths Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration

[F4]

A curve satisfying the finite-action continuity equation is W2-absolutely continuous with squared metric speed bounded by its action. Finite-action continuity equations generate AC2 Wasserstein curves

[F5]

AC is the inherited axiom in the flow and transport suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F6]

The minimum integrated action among Borel finite-action fields solving the same continuity equation equals the integral of the squared metric derivative. AC2 curves admit a unique minimum-action velocity field

[F7]

Scalar domination passes limits through finite-measure integrals. Dominated convergence

Given: AC and the data above.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F5

Since mt is the image of Xt under Bochner integration, [F3] and the Lipschitz bound on Φ show t↦mt is continuous. The full shifted selection S(a,u) is jointly Borel on H×Qr by [F2]; extending vt=−S(a(t),u) by zero outside the closed set Qr gives a Borel field on [0,T]×Rd. Here a(t)=∇R(mt) is continuous. By [F1] and [F2], a representative of the Hilbert derivative satisfies X˙(t,s)=vt(X(t,s)) for almost every (t,s). Its squared integral is ∫0T∫∣vt(u)∣2dμt(u)dt=∫0T∥X˙(t)∥K2dt<∞.

2.1F1step 1.1

For φ∈Cc∞((0,T)×Rd), the scalar chain rule along the almost-everywhere absolutely continuous label paths gives ddtφ(t,X(t,s))=∂tφ(t,X(t,s))+∇xφ(t,X(t,s))⋅vt(X(t,s)) for almost every (t,s). The right side is integrable: the test derivatives are bounded, μt is a probability, and [F1] gives finite L1 velocity action on [0,T]. Integrating in s and t, Fubini and the vanishing of φ near t=0,T give the weak continuity-equation identity for μt.

2.2F1F4step 1.1

The coupling (X(s),X(t))#μ0 gives W2(μs,μt)2≤∥X(s)−X(t)∥K2. Cauchy–Schwarz in time and [F1] imply W2(μs,μt)≤∫st∥X˙(q)∥K dq for s<t. Thus μ∈AC2 on [0,T]. Alternatively [F4] applies to the continuity equation and the action bound from step 1.1.

2.3F2F7step 1.1construct

Fix a time t and put ft(u)=⟨∇R(mt),Φ(u)⟩+V(u)+ιQr(u). On Qr this function is bounded, lower semicontinuous and semiconvex, with a nonempty subdifferential and minimum section gt=−vt bounded uniformly on compact time intervals by [F2]. For small ε>0 let Jεx minimize ft(y)+∣x−y∣2/(2ε) and let ft,ε be the minimum value. The resolvent proof in [F2] gives Jε Lipschitz. Comparing the envelope at x+h using Jεx, and at x using Jε(x+h), bounds the difference from ⟨(x−Jεx)/ε,h⟩ by O(∣h∣2) locally. Thus ft,ε is C1 and its gradient is (x−Jεx)/ε. The monotonicity estimate from [F2] gives ∣∇ft,ε(x)∣≤∣gt(x)∣/(1+εαt) on Qr, with αt a semiconvexity coefficient; the same proof gives pointwise convergence to gt(x). Dominated convergence yields convergence in L2(μt). Each gradient belongs to the closure of gradients of compactly supported smooth functions: multiply the C1 envelope by smooth cutoffs equal to one on BN, with derivative O(1/N), and then mollify. On Qr the envelope stays between the fixed lower bound and upper bound of ft, so the cutoff derivative term tends to zero in L2(μt); the other tail tends to zero by the bound just proved. Mollification converges uniformly in C1 on each compact set. Therefore gt belongs to the spatial gradient closure in L2(μt).

3.1F1F2F4F6step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3∎

Let w be a minimum-action field for μ as in the AC² minimal-velocity theorem. Subtracting its continuity equation from that of v and using time tensor tests shows ∫(vt−wt)⋅∇ψ dμt=0 for almost every t, simultaneously for a countable set of compactly supported smooth ψ dense in C1 on each compact ball. Such a set is obtained by rational polynomial approximations and fixed smooth cutoffs; extend the equality to every compactly supported smooth test by uniform gradient approximation. By step 2.3, vt belongs to the L2(μt) closure of these gradients. Hence ⟨vt−wt,vt⟩L2(μt)=0, and therefore ∥wt∥L2(μt)2=∥vt∥L2(μt)2+∥wt−vt∥L2(μt)2 almost everywhere. Thus v is a minimum-action field; [F6] identifies its action with ∫0T∣μ˙t∣W22dt. The constraint is included: for any absolutely continuous label path in Qr, at a two-sided differentiability time and every n∈NQr(Xt), the inequalities n⋅(Xt+h−Xt)≤0 for both signs of h give n⋅X˙t=0. Thus normal-cone terms contribute no velocity pairing, and the constrained minimum cannot be replaced by an unconstrained selection.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

99 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources