Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The monotone convergence property plus the Archimedean property imply the least-upper-bound property

Statement

Let FF be an Archimedean ordered field (Archimedean ordered field) with the monotone convergence property (MCT) of The five completeness properties of an ordered field: least upper bound, monotone convergence, nested intervals, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy completeness. Then FF has the least-upper-bound property (LUB), that is, FF is a complete ordered field (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

The Archimedean hypothesis is stated for symmetry with the other implications on this page and is in fact redundant here: (MCT) implies it on its own (The monotone convergence property alone forces the Archimedean property, so it carries no separate Archimedean hypothesis).

The supremum is produced by bisection between an upper bound and a non-upper bound, and it is identified as a limit of both bracketing sequences.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An Archimedean ordered field FF with (MCT), a nonempty SFS \subseteq F bounded above by some BFB \in F, and an element s0Ss_0 \in S.

[L1]

The properties (MCT) and (LUB), and least upper bounds: uu is an upper bound of SS when sus \le u for all sSs \in S, and a least upper bound when moreover uvu \le v for every upper bound vv; (LUB) says every nonempty subset bounded above has one (The five completeness properties of an ordered field: least upper bound, monotone convergence, nested intervals, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy completeness, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Upper bound, least upper bound, and strict upper bound).

[L2]

Sequences in an ordered field: nondecreasing, nonincreasing, bounded above, and convergence in FF (Sequences, convergence, Cauchyness, monotonicity, boundedness and closed intervals in an arbitrary ordered field).

[L3]

Archimedean property: for every zFz \in F there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with z<n1Fz < n \cdot 1_F (Archimedean ordered field); the canonical naturals are positive for n1n \ge 1 and satisfy n1Fm1Fn \cdot 1_F \le m \cdot 1_F for nmn \le m (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[L4]

Recursion theorem (The recursion theorem), induction principle (The principle of mathematical induction), and totality of the order on N\mathbb{N} (\le is a linear order on N\mathbb{N}).

[L5]

Powers and Bernoulli: a0=1a^0 = 1, an+1=anaa^{n+1} = a^n a (Integer powers ama^m); (1F+x)n1F+nx(1_F + x)^n \ge 1_F + n \cdot x for x1Fx \ge -1_F (Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)n1+nx(1+x)^n \ge 1 + nx).

[L6]

Order arithmetic: 0<1F0 < 1_F (The multiplicative identity is positive); adding a constant preserves the strict order and strict inequalities add (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities), the nonstrict forms following with the equality cases; a>0a > 0 gives a1>0a^{-1} > 0 and 0<a<b0 < a < b gives 0<b1<a10 < b^{-1} < a^{-1} (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order); the order is total and transitive (Ordered field).

[L7]

Absolute value: u0|u| \ge 0, u=u|u| = |-u|, u=u|u| = u for u0u \ge 0 (Basic properties of the absolute value); and u+vu+v|u + v| \le |u| + |v| (The triangle inequality).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Put u0:=Bu_0 := B and l0:=s01Fl_0 := s_0 - 1_F; then u0u_0 is an upper bound of SS, l0l_0 is not one because s0Ss_0 \in S and l0<s0l_0 < s_0, and l0<s0u0l_0 < s_0 \le u_0.

L1L6construct
1.2

Writing m(l,u):=(l+u)(21F)1m(l,u) := (l + u)\,(2 \cdot 1_F)^{-1}, define f:F×FF×Ff : F \times F \to F \times F by f(l,u):=(l,m(l,u))f(l,u) := (l, m(l,u)) when m(l,u)m(l,u) is an upper bound of SS and f(l,u):=(m(l,u),u)f(l,u) := (m(l,u), u) otherwise; the recursion theorem applied to F×FF \times F, the element (l0,u0)(l_0, u_0) and ff gives a unique g:NF×Fg : \mathbb{N} \to F \times F with g(0)=(l0,u0)g(0) = (l_0,u_0) and g(n+1)=f(g(n))g(n+1) = f(g(n)), and we write g(n)=(ln,un)g(n) = (l_n, u_n).

L4L6construct
1.3

A constant sequence in FF converges to its value, since aa=0<ε|a - a| = 0 < \varepsilon for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0.

L2L7
2.1

By induction on nn: unu_n is an upper bound of SS; lnl_n is not an upper bound of SS; lnln+1un+1unl_n \le l_{n+1} \le u_{n+1} \le u_n; and unln=(u0l0)((21F)n)1u_n - l_n = (u_0 - l_0)\,((2 \cdot 1_F)^n)^{-1}. The base case is step 1.1 together with (21F)0=1F(2 \cdot 1_F)^0 = 1_F; for the step, m:=m(ln,un)m := m(l_n,u_n) satisfies lnmunl_n \le m \le u_n and mln=unm=(unln)(21F)1m - l_n = u_n - m = (u_n - l_n)(2 \cdot 1_F)^{-1}, and whichever of the two clauses of ff applies, the retained pair again brackets SS in the stated sense with half the previous length.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L5L6
3.1

The lengths tend to 00 in FF: given ε>0\varepsilon > 0, the element (u0l0)ε1(u_0 - l_0)\varepsilon^{-1} is positive, so [L3] supplies n1n \ge 1 with (u0l0)ε1<n1F(u_0-l_0)\varepsilon^{-1} < n \cdot 1_F, and for every pnp \ge n Bernoulli at x=1Fx = 1_F gives (21F)p1F+p1F>p1Fn1F>(u0l0)ε1>0(2 \cdot 1_F)^p \ge 1_F + p \cdot 1_F > p \cdot 1_F \ge n \cdot 1_F > (u_0-l_0)\varepsilon^{-1} > 0, whence uplp=(u0l0)((21F)p)1<εu_p - l_p = (u_0-l_0)((2 \cdot 1_F)^p)^{-1} < \varepsilon.

step 2.1L3L5L6
3.2

The sequence (un)(-u_n) is nondecreasing and is bounded above by l0-l_0, since l0lnunl_0 \le l_n \le u_n for every nn; so (MCT) gives wFw \in F with unw-u_n \to w, and putting c:=wc := -w one has unc=((un)w)=(un)w|u_n - c| = |{-}((-u_n) - w)| = |(-u_n) - w|, so uncu_n \to c in FF.

step 2.1L1L2L6L7
4.1

lncl_n \to c in FF: given ε>0\varepsilon > 0, step 3.1 supplies N1N_1 with unln<ε/2u_n - l_n < \varepsilon/2 for nN1n \ge N_1 and step 3.2 supplies N2N_2 with unc<ε/2|u_n - c| < \varepsilon/2 for nN2n \ge N_2, and for nn beyond both, lnclnun+unc=(unln)+unc<ε|l_n - c| \le |l_n - u_n| + |u_n - c| = (u_n - l_n) + |u_n - c| < \varepsilon.

step 3.1step 3.2L2L4L6L7
4.2

cc is an upper bound of SS: for sSs \in S one has suns \le u_n for every nn by step 2.1, and the constant sequence with value ss converges to ss while uncu_n \to c, so scs \le c by [L8].

step 1.3step 2.1step 3.2L1L8
5.1

cc is the least upper bound: let vv be any upper bound of SS; for each nn the element lnl_n is not an upper bound, so some sSs \in S has ln<svl_n < s \le v and hence lnvl_n \le v; since lncl_n \to c and the constant sequence with value vv converges to vv, [L8] gives cvc \le v.

step 1.3step 2.1step 4.1L1L6L8
6.1

So c=supSc = \sup S exists in FF; as SS was an arbitrary nonempty subset bounded above, FF has (LUB) and is a complete ordered field.

step 4.2step 5.1L1discharge-construct

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 99 results over 24 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources