Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Well-definedness of the finite-dimensional mini backward Euler equations

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For each fixed finite mesh and time partition in The mixed mini-element backward Euler Navier–Stokes scheme, every term of its velocity equation is a continuous finite-dimensional functional of the trial and test vectors, the pressure constraints are linear, and the forcing averages exist.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded Lipschitz domain, a finite matching mesh, its mini spaces, a finite partition, f∈L2(0,T;L2), and uhn−1∈Zh.

[F1]

The MINI spaces are finite-dimensional subspaces of H01(D)d and the weak kernel Zh is a finite-dimensional linear subspace. (The conforming P1-bubble/P1 mini element, Weak and pointwise divergence-free discrete velocities)

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the MINI/Stokes space conventions; the Bochner criterion itself only uses the asserted strong measurability and integrable norm. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The conforming P1-bubble/P1 mini element, Bochner integrability criterion)

[F3]

A strongly measurable L2(0,T;L2) function is Bochner integrable on the finite interval, since Holder makes its norm integrable. (Bochner-integrable function, Bochner integrability criterion, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Every finite-dimensional subspace inherits the continuous inclusions and bilinear forms from V and H; thus (uhn−uhn−1,vh)H, aν(uhn,vh), and b(vh,phn) are continuous in their coordinates.

2.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1∎

The nonlinear term is continuous by [F2], and the force average is a finite vector in L2(D)d by [F3] because each interval has τn>0. The divergence constraint is a finite set of linear equations in Vh and Qh. These facts make the scheme a well-defined finite-dimensional system.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The mixed mini-element backward Euler Navier–Stokes scheme.

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources