How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Well-definedness of the finite-dimensional mini backward Euler equations
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. For each fixed finite mesh and time partition in The mixed mini-element backward Euler Navier–Stokes scheme, every term of its velocity equation is a continuous finite-dimensional functional of the trial and test vectors, the pressure constraints are linear, and the forcing averages exist.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, a bounded Lipschitz domain, a finite matching mesh, its mini spaces, a finite partition, , and .
The MINI spaces are finite-dimensional subspaces of and the weak kernel is a finite-dimensional linear subspace. (The conforming P1-bubble/P1 mini element, Weak and pointwise divergence-free discrete velocities)
The skew convective form is continuous on . (The skew convective form for incompressible flow, Continuity, energy cancellation, and Sobolev bounds for skew convection)
Countable Choice is inherited from the MINI/Stokes space conventions; the Bochner criterion itself only uses the asserted strong measurability and integrable norm. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The conforming P1-bubble/P1 mini element, Bochner integrability criterion)
A strongly measurable function is Bochner integrable on the finite interval, since Holder makes its norm integrable. (Bochner-integrable function, Bochner integrability criterion, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)
Proof
Every finite-dimensional subspace inherits the continuous inclusions and bilinear forms from and ; thus , , and are continuous in their coordinates.
The nonlinear term is continuous by [F2], and the force average is a finite vector in by [F3] because each interval has . The divergence constraint is a finite set of linear equations in and . These facts make the scheme a well-defined finite-dimensional system.
Depends on
- The mixed mini-element backward Euler Navier–Stokes scheme
- The conforming P1-bubble/P1 mini element
- Weak and pointwise divergence-free discrete velocities
- The skew convective form for incompressible flow
- Continuity, energy cancellation, and Sobolev bounds for skew convection
- Bochner-integrable function
- Bochner integrability criterion
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The mixed mini-element backward Euler Navier–Stokes scheme.
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Endre Süli and Tabea Tscherpel, Fully discrete finite element approximation of unsteady flows of implicitly constituted incompressible fluids, arXiv:1804.02264v1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Xiaoming He, Introduction and Basic Implementation for Finite Element Methods, Chapter 9: Finite elements for 2D unsteady Navier–Stokes equations (standard reference, not scraped)