Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniqueness and strong trace for two-dimensional solenoidal energy velocities

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let D⊂R2 be bounded, connected and Lipschitz, T>0, ν>0, f∈L2(0,T;L2(D)2) and u0∈Hσ. There is at most one solenoidal energy weak velocity in the sense of Solenoidal energy weak velocity for incompressible Navier–Stokes for these data. Every such velocity belongs to L4(0,T;L4(D)2)∩C([0,T];Hσ) and has its actual restricted derivative in L2(0,T;Vσ∗). The continuity is strong, its initial value is u0, and its solenoidal evolution equation satisfies the Hilbert-triple energy chain rule. No full nonsolenoidal V∗ derivative or regular instantaneous pressure is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the data and spaces in the Statement.

[A1]

Full Choice supplies Countable and Dependent Choice, including the approximation and countable selections below. (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration)

[F1]

The velocity is in Lt∞Hσ∩Lt2Vσ, is weakly continuous in Hσ with initial value u0, and satisfies the fixed-solenoidal-test momentum equation. The skew convection agrees with the divergence-free convective form, and its energy pairing cancels by the proved skew-convection supplier. The strain identity polarizes to 2(ε(u),ε(v))=(∇u,∇v)+(div⁡u,div⁡v); for solenoidal inputs the Newtonian viscosity is therefore ν(∇u,∇v). (Solenoidal energy weak velocity for incompressible Navier–Stokes, Stokes velocity and pressure spaces and weak forms, The skew convective form for incompressible flow, Continuity, energy cancellation, and Sobolev bounds for skew convection, The homogeneous Dirichlet strain identity)

[F2]
[F3]

A separable reflexive energy space continuously and densely embedded in its Hilbert pivot forms the canonical evolution triple, and its Lt2V functions with Lt2V∗ derivative are strongly continuous in the pivot and satisfy the energy chain rule. (Banach evolution triples and weak time derivatives, The Banach evolution-space energy identity and H trace)

[F4]

Holder and dominated convergence apply. In particular, for a nonnegative B∈L1(0,T) the integrable majorant B gives ∫{B>K}B→0 as K→∞. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Dominated convergence)

Proof

1.1F1F4givenalgebra

For scalar z∈Cc∞(R2) the coordinate fundamental theorem gives ∣z(x,y)∣2≤2∫R∣zzx∣(s,y) ds=:A(y) and ∣z(x,y)∣2≤2∫R∣zzy∣(x,s) ds=:B(x). Thus ∣z∣4≤A(y)B(x), and integration and Holder give ∥z∥44≤4∥z∥22∥zx∥2∥zy∥2≤2∥z∥22∥∇z∥22. Apply this to components of a vector and to differences of compact smooth approximants defining H01(D)2, extended by zero. The inequality makes the approximants Cauchy in L4, so their limit is the same L2 function; consequently ∥z∥42≤C∥z∥2∥∇z∥2 on H01(D)2. Each energy velocity therefore belongs to Lt4Lx4.

1.2A1F1F2F3constructalgebra

With its H1 inner product the complete space H1(D)2 is Hilbert. Its closed subspace H01(D)2 is Hilbert, as is Vσ, the kernel of bounded divergence therein. Poincare gives its equivalent gradient norm and [F2] gives reflexivity. Separability follows by mapping H1(D)2 isometrically, in its full norm, into the finite product of scalar L2 spaces listing components and first derivatives. This product is separable by [F2]; every metric subspace of a separable metric space is separable: restrict a countable ambient base and, using Countable Choice, select a point from each nonempty restricted basic set. This proves separability of Vσ. The closure Hσ is Hilbert as a closed L2 subspace. Its inclusion of Vσ is continuous by Poincare, injective and dense by definition. Thus the canonical pivot map Jh(v)=(h,v)2 is bounded and injective and the triple has all hypotheses of [F3].

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra

For a solenoidal energy velocity u, its convection functional on Vσ is N(u)(v)=−∫D(u⊗u):∇v, since the divergence and boundary terms vanish by approximation. Holder bounds its norm by ∥u∥42, which belongs to L2(0,T) by step 1.1. This is a strongly measurable dual-valued function: the map L4(D)2→Vσ∗ is continuous and quadratic, and u is strongly measurable in L4 as a continuous image of its Bochner Vσ representative. The viscous functional is a bounded linear image of u∈Lt2Vσ, and the force functional is a bounded linear image of f∈Lt2L2. The fixed-test equation [F1] therefore says that the actual restricted derivative is the Lt2Vσ∗ function f−ν(∇u,∇⋅)−N(u). Apply [F3] to obtain a unique strong C([0,T];Hσ) representative and its energy chain rule. This representative agrees with the given weakly continuous one (fixed dense tests identify them), and so its initial value is u0.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For two such velocities u,u~ with the same data let z=u−u~. Their difference has restricted derivative in Lt2Vσ∗ by step 2.1, so [F3] permits pairing its equation with z and differentiating its squared pivot norm. The trilinear cancellation leaves, with either velocity named u, 12ddt∥z∥22+ν∥∇z∥22≤∣∫D(z⋅∇)u⋅z∣≤C∥∇u∥2∥z∥2∥∇z∥2≤ν2∥∇z∥22+Cν−1∥∇u∥22∥z∥22. The first estimate uses the planar bound in step 1.1; the final one is ab≤νa2/2+Cν−1b2. The initial difference is zero by step 2.1. Put Y(t)=∥z(t)∥22 and B(t)=Cν−1∥∇u(t)∥22, increasing the constant to absorb the factor 2. The chain rule makes Y absolutely continuous and gives Y(t)≤Y(s)+∫stB(r)Y(r) dr, with B≥0 in L1. Choose K>0 with ∫{B>K}B<1/4 by [F4], and choose δ>0 with Kδ<1/4. Partition [0,T] into finitely many intervals of length at most δ; each has ∫IB<1/2. On the first interval Y(0)=0 and continuity gives sup⁡IY≤(sup⁡IY)∫IB≤12sup⁡IY, hence Y=0. Inductively the same argument applies on every next interval since its initial value is zero. Thus z=0 throughout [0,T]. This proves uniqueness and, together with the earlier steps, all stated regularity and trace assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources