Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-dimensional quadratic oscillatory amplitude bound

Statement

Let R>0, λ>0, σ∈{−1,1}, and H∈Cc1((−R,R);C). Then ∣∫−RRH(u)eiσλu2/2 du∣≤6∥H∥∞+R∥H′∥∞λ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated compactly supported complex amplitude, R,λ,σ, and the componentwise complex integral convention of Finite-interval oscillatory integral and phase convention.

[F1]

Derivative of a complex oscillatory phase: (eiσλu2/2)′=iσλueiσλu2/2.

[F2]

If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v: integration by parts on a compact interval holds for real C1 functions and hence componentwise for complex functions.

[F3]

Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set: an increasing affine map t↦Rt on a compact interval changes a real integral by its positive derivative R; apply separately to the real and imaginary parts of a complex integrand.

[F4]

For a continuous complex z on a compact interval, the componentwise definition of Finite-interval oscillatory integral and phase convention, the conjugation and modulus laws Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive, and real linearity and monotonicity from Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm give ∣∫z∣≤∫∣z∣: if Z=∫z≠0, set ζ=Z‾/∣Z∣, so ∣ζ∣=1 and ∣Z∣=∫Re⁡(ζz)≤∫∣z∣. If Z=0 the bound is immediate. The conjugation and modulus laws also give ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣ for complex scalars.

[F5]

The integral over an interval is additive across an interior cut by the coordinate-slice clause of Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm; apply this to the real and imaginary parts of complex integrands.

Proof

1.1givenF3F4F5constructalgebra

Rescale u=Rt by [F3], put Λ=λR2, and define H~(t)=H(Rt). If Λ≤4, [F4] bounds the integral by 2R∥H∥∞≤4∥H∥∞/λ, so the claim holds. Assume Λ>4, put δ=2Λ−1/2<1, and split [−1,1] into [−δ,δ], [δ,1], and [−1,−δ]. By [F5], the integral is the sum over these subintervals; the central integral in the rescaled variable is at most 2δ∥H∥∞=4∥H∥∞/Λ by [F4].

2.1givenF1F2F4F5step 1.1algebra∎

On [δ,1], [F1] and [F2] integrate by parts using (iσΛt)−1 and H~; the boundary at 1 vanishes because H~ is compactly supported in (−1,1). The remaining boundary is at most ∥H∥∞/(Λδ). The integral term is at most 1Λ(R∥H′∥∞∫δ1t−1dt+∥H∥∞∫δ1t−2dt)≤R∥H′∥∞+∥H∥∞Λδ, since both integrals are at most 1/δ. [F4] justifies the complex integral norm bounds; the negative interval has the same estimates. With δ=2Λ−1/2, each boundary is at most ∥H∥∞/(2Λ) and each integral is at most (R∥H′∥∞+∥H∥∞)/(2Λ). By [F5], adding the central piece and two tails gives (6∥H∥∞+R∥H′∥∞)/Λ in the rescaled integral. Multiplication by R and Λ=λR2 give the claimed bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources