Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local stationary expansion for a quadratic phase

Statement

Let R>0, λ≥1, σ∈{−1,1}, and A∈Cc4((−R,R);C). Fix an even χ∈Cc∞((−R,R)) equal to 1 on a neighborhood of 0. With ∥A∥C4:=max⁡0≤j≤4∥A(j)∥∞, there is a finite constant CR,χ, depending only on R and χ, such that ∣∫−RRA(u)eiσλu2/2 du−A(0)2πλeiσπ/4∣≤CR,χ∥A∥C4λ−3/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A,R,λ,σ,χ of the Statement.

[F1]

Fresnel whole-line moment from the damped complex Gaussian: ∫Reiσλu2/2 du=2π/λ eiσπ/4 as an ordinary two-sided improper integral.

[F2]

One-dimensional quadratic oscillatory amplitude bound: for H∈Cc1((−R,R)), ∣∫H(u)eiσλu2/2 du∣≤(6∥H∥∞+R∥H′∥∞)λ−1/2.

[F3]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a): continuous derivatives integrate to endpoint increments; applying it twice gives the integral Taylor remainder.

[F5]

Derivative of a complex oscillatory phase: (eiσλu2/2)′=iσλueiσλu2/2.

[F6]

Improper integrals over unbounded intervals, Improper integrals with several singular ends, and Absolute and conditional convergence of improper integrals: one-sided limits define improper integrals, whole-line integrals sum separately convergent tails, and absolute convergence is tested on each tail.

[F7]

The improper p-test for rational exponents and Comparison tests for improper integrals: a continuous function bounded in modulus by C∣u∣−4 on each tail has an absolutely convergent improper integral there.

[F8]

For a continuous complex z on a compact interval, the componentwise definition of Finite-interval oscillatory integral and phase convention, the conjugation and modulus laws Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive, and real linearity and monotonicity from Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm give ∣∫z∣≤∫∣z∣: if Z=∫z≠0, set ζ=Z‾/∣Z∣, so ∣ζ∣=1 and ∣Z∣=∫Re⁡(ζz)≤∫∣z∣. If Z=0 the bound is immediate. The conjugation and modulus laws also give ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣ for complex scalars.

[F9]

The mean-value theorem Mean value theorem on a closed real interval and Heine--Cantor Heine-Cantor in R: a continuous real function on a compact subset of R is uniformly continuous: on compact [−R,R], the continuous derivatives D(3) and D(4) are uniformly continuous; componentwise mean-value estimates justify differentiating B(u)=∫01(1−t)D′′(tu) dt twice, giving B′(u)=∫01(1−t)tD′′′(tu) dt and B′′(u)=∫01(1−t)t2D′′′′(tu) dt.

[F10]

Reflection u↦−u preserves the compact interval integral by Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set; real interval linearity from Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm, applied componentwise, then makes the integral of an odd complex function on [−R,R] zero.

Proof

1.1givenF3F9constructalgebra

Put D(u)=A(u)−A(0)χ(u)−A′(0)uχ(u). Then D(0)=D′(0)=0. Near zero, twice applying [F3] gives D(u)=u2B(u) with B(u)=∫01(1−t)D′′(tu) dt; differentiating this finite parameter integral twice is justified by [F9] and gives B∈C2. Away from zero set B=D/u2. These definitions agree near zero, B is compactly supported, and ∥B∥C2≤CR,χ∥A∥C4. Thus A=A(0)χ+A′(0)uχ+u2B.

2.1givenF1F4F5F6F7F8F10step 1.1algebra

By [F10], the integral of uχ(u)eiσλu2/2 is zero: the integrand is odd and vanishes outside [−R,R]. Let S=1−χ. Since S=0 near 0, apply [F4] and [F5] twice on finite truncations of each half-line. All boundary terms vanish at the inner endpoints because S=0 there, and at infinity because S/u→0 and ((S/u)′/u)→0. The final amplitude K(u)=((S/u)′u)′ is continuous, vanishes near 0, and is O(∣u∣−4) on both tails; [F7] makes its phase-weighted improper integral absolutely convergent. Taking one-sided limits in the finite integration-by-parts identities and using [F6] gives ∫RS(u)eiσλu2/2 du=1(iσλ)2∫RK(u)eiσλu2/2 du. Apply [F8] on finite truncations and pass to the limits from [F7] to bound the latter modulus by λ−2∫R∣K(u)∣du=Cχλ−2.

3.1givenF1F2F8step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Since χ=1 near zero, [F1] and step 2.1 give A(0)∫χ(u)eiσλu2/2 du=A(0)2πλeiσπ/4+O(Cχ∥A∥C4λ−2). For the last term in step 1.1, one integration by parts gives ∫u2Beiσλu2/2=−(iσλ)−1∫(B+uB′)eiσλu2/2; the boundary term vanishes by compact support. Apply [F2] to H=B+uB′∈Cc1 and the bound on ∥B∥C2 to obtain O(CR,χ∥A∥C4λ−3/2). Since λ−2≤λ−3/2 for λ≥1, adding the three contributions and applying the complex scalar triangle inequality in [F8] proves the stated estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

108 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources