Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nilpotent-orbit tensor covariants extend and polarize

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let e be a nilpotent endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex vector space V, let Ge={g∈GL(V):geg−1=e} be its centralizer, and let d≥0.

  1. Every Ge-fixed endomorphism B∈End⁡C(V⊗d) is the value at e of a GL(V)-equivariant polynomial map Φ ⁣:End⁡(V)→End⁡(V⊗d) (polynomial in the matrix entries of the input, with Φ(gXg−1)=(g⊗d)Φ(X)(g−1)⊗d).
  2. Every such equivariant polynomial map is a finite sum Φ(X)=∑hch σh(Xh1⊗⋯⊗Xhd) with hi≥0, where σh is a place permutation of the d tensor factors and ch is an invariant scalar polynomial in X (a polynomial in the traces tr⁡(Xk)).

The extension in (1) is proved by Hartogs lifting on the normal codimension-≥2 orbit closure; the structure in (2) is proved by polarization and the Schur-Weyl description of tensor invariants, not by importing a first-fundamental-theorem for the full matrix algebra.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a nilpotent e in End⁡(V) with dim⁡V=N<∞ and largest Jordan block l when V≠0, an integer d≥0, the orbit closure X=GL(V)⋅e‾ with dense orbit O=GL(V)⋅e, and the centralizer Ge.

[F1]

X is the spectrum of a reduced irreducible normal domain A=C[X], and O is its dense open orbit; Ge is the unit group of the full finite-dimensional associative centralizer algebra Ce=End⁡C[e](V)={b:be=eb}. Its units are exactly {b∈Ce:det⁡b≠0}: if b commutes with e and is invertible on V, its inverse also commutes with e. This is a nonempty open subset of the affine vector space Ce, containing the identity, so Ge is smooth, irreducible and connected; no product-of-matrix-algebras identification is needed (Type-A nilpotent orbit closures are normal via chain varieties, Nilpotent endomorphisms and their nilpotency index, Every finite-dimensional nilpotent endomorphism has a basis of Jordan strings).

[F2]

Hartogs lemma for a normal S2 domain A: a fraction f∈Frac⁡(A) regular in codimension 1 lies in A. More precisely, if f is regular off a closed subset of codimension ≥2, then f∈A. Proof ingredients: set J={a∈A:af∈A}; Jp=Ap for every height-one prime; if 0≠a∈J then every associated prime of A/(a) has height 1 by the normal S2 property and the depth criterion; prime avoidance produces b∈J avoiding those primes; from b(af)=a(bf) and regularity of b modulo a one gets af∈aA, and cancellation gives f∈A (normal domain implies s two, The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion, Associated primes commute with localization for finite modules, Depth drops by one after quotienting by a regular element, Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes, An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them).

[F3]

Weyl complete reducibility applies to finite-dimensional sl(V)-modules in characteristic zero; the reduction in step 4.1 gives the required GL(V)-invariant lifting for the polynomial-map spaces used here. Invariant tensors in mixed tensor powers of V are spanned by permutation contractions (Weyl's complete reducibility theorem, The Schur-Weyl mutual centralizer theorem on tensor powers).

[F4]

The trace form tr⁡(XY) on End⁡(V) is symmetric and nondegenerate, and tensor bases identify End⁡(V⊗d) with End⁡(V)⊗d (Classical complex matrix Lie algebras, The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The data of [F1]-[F4]: the nilpotent e, the normal orbit closure X with dense orbit O, the connected centralizer Ge, the degree d, and a Ge-fixed B∈End⁡(V⊗d).

1.1F1constructalgebra

The zero-dimensional case. If V=0, its orbit closure is a point and its boundary is empty by [F1]. For d=0, V⊗d=C and every fixed operator is a scalar, extended by the constant polynomial map; the empty permutation and empty tensor product give the asserted normal form. For d>0, V⊗d=0 and its endomorphism space has only the zero operator, extended by the zero map; the normal form is the empty sum. Thus both assertions hold without a largest Jordan block. Henceforth V≠0, so its largest block length l exists.

1.2F1F2algebra

Hartogs lifting. Let A=C[X] and let f∈Frac⁡(A) be regular on O, hence regular off a closed subset of X∖O; since ∂X has codimension ≥2 in X by the normality lemma [F1], f is regular in codimension 1 and therefore extends to A by [F2]. Applying this coordinatewise to maps into a finite-dimensional vector space shows that every regular map O→W into a finite-dimensional vector space extends uniquely to a regular map X→W.

1.3F1constructalgebra

The equivariant map on O. Fix B∈End⁡(V⊗d)Ge and define, for g∈GL(V), F(g e g−1):=(g⊗d) B (g−1)⊗d∈End⁡(V⊗d). This is well defined: if g1eg1−1=g2eg2−1, then g2−1g1∈Ge, so (g2−1g1)⊗dB(g2−1g1)−⊗d=B by Ge-invariance, which rearranges to (g1⊗d)B(g1−1)⊗d=(g2⊗d)B(g2−1)⊗d. The map F is GL(V)-equivariant by construction: F(hXh−1)=(h⊗d)F(X)(h−1)⊗d for X∈O.

2.1F1step 1.3algebraconstruct

Regularity of F on O. The ranks of X0,X1,…,Xl−1 are constant on O. Cover O by open charts where fixed minors used to select bases of the kernels and images, their quotient complements and Jordan top vectors are nonzero. Gaussian elimination on such a chart gives a Jordan basis for X with entries regular in X. Let g(X) carry a fixed Jordan basis for e to this chosen Jordan basis for X, with the same ordered string lengths. Then g(X)eg(X)−1=X. Restricting to the open chart where the Jordan-basis determinant is nonzero makes both g(X) and g(X)−1 regular, since their entries have only the fixed nonvanishing minors and determinant as denominators. Thus X↦(g(X)⊗d)B(g(X)−1)⊗d is the map of step 1.3 and is regular on each chart. These charts cover O; on overlaps g2(X)−1g1(X)∈Ge, so the expressions agree by Ge-invariance of B. Hence F is regular on O.

3.1F2step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Extension to X. By steps 1.2 and 2.1 the map F ⁣:O→End⁡(V⊗d) is a regular equivariant map on the dense orbit; by step 1.2 it extends uniquely to a regular map F ⁣:X→End⁡(V⊗d). Since C[X]=C[End⁡(V)]/I(X) and X is an affine closed subset of the affine space End⁡(V), the coordinate functions of F are restrictions of polynomial functions on End⁡(V); fixing representatives gives a polynomial map Φ ⁣:End⁡(V)→End⁡(V⊗d) extending F.

4.1F3step 1.3step 3.1algebra

Equivariance of the polynomial lift. The extension F on X is equivariant: for every g, the two regular maps expressing equivariance agree on the dense orbit by step 1.3 and therefore on X. Let EK be the finite-dimensional rational module of polynomial maps operatornameEnd(V)ooperatornameEnd(Votimesd) of degree at most K, for KgedegPhi, with action (gcdotPsi)(Y)=gotimesdPsi(g−1Yg)(g−1)otimesd. Let IKsubsetEK consist of maps vanishing on X. Then IK is stable and the class of the lift from step 3.1 in EK/IK is invariant. Scalar matrices act trivially on EK: they conjugate neither the input nor the output. For Nge2, Weyl's theorem [F3] applied to the semisimple Lie algebra mathfraksl(V) gives an mathfraksl(V)-stable complement to IK. This complement is stable under mathrmSL(V), since elementary matrices exp(tEij) generate that group and their rational representation acts by exponentiating the differential; together with scalar matrices they generate mathrmGL(V) over mathbbC. For N=1 the whole group acts trivially, so any vector-space complement suffices. The quotient map restricted to this complement is thus a mathrmGL(V)-isomorphism and lifts the invariant class to an invariant Phi′inEK. It agrees with F on X and satisfies Phi′(e)=B, proving (1).

5.1F4step 4.1algebra

Polarization. Write Φ=∑kΦk for its homogeneous components of degree k; each Φk is equivariant. Fix k and assume for the structure argument that Φ is homogeneous of degree k. Polarize the k matrix variables X1,…,Xk of Φ and pair the output in End⁡(V⊗d) with d independent matrices Y1,…,Yd using the nondegenerate trace pairing on each tensor factor; this produces a multilinear GL(V)-invariant P(X1,…,Xk;Y1,…,Yd)∈C in (k+d) matrix arguments.

6.1F3step 5.1algebra

Tensor invariants are permutation contractions. By the Schur-Weyl description [F3], every multilinear invariant of the matrix arguments is a linear combination of contractions: each argument contributes one upper and one lower index, an invariant pairs each upper index with a lower index of another argument, and the invariant is a product over the cycles of the resulting permutation of traces of the corresponding cyclically ordered product of matrices.

7.1F4step 5.1step 6.1algebra

Covariant normal form. Depolarize in the k identical variables Xi=X and read each contraction cycle. A cycle that uses only X-arguments contributes a scalar invariant polynomial in X; a cycle that uses some Y-arguments alternates blocks of X's and single Y's, so its trace is precisely the trace pairing of Y1⊗⋯⊗Yd with a place permutation of Xh1⊗⋯⊗Xhd. By nondegeneracy of the trace pairing, the operator identity Φ(X)=∑hch(X) σh(Xh1⊗⋯⊗Xhd) follows, with hi≥0, σh a place permutation and ch a scalar invariant polynomial (a polynomial in the traces tr⁡(Xm)); summing over the homogeneous components gives assertion (2).

8.1step 7.1algebra∎

Evaluation at e. Since el=0 for the largest Jordan block length l of e, evaluating the normal form at X=e kills every term with some hi≥l; the surviving terms are place permutations applied to a tensor product of nonnegative powers eh1⊗⋯⊗ehd multiplied by the scalar invariants ch(e), which are complex constants; since tr⁡(em)=0 for every positive m, the scalar invariant polynomials satisfy ch(e)=ch(0). This gives the concrete description of the Ge-fixed endomorphisms used by the double centralizer theorem.

Remarks

  • The extension step is exactly where the normality of the orbit closure is consumed: the proof of extension uses the codimension-two Hartogs property. Omitting that input leaves the all-degree converse unproved by this argument.

  • The scalar invariant coefficients ch lie in the polynomial ring generated by the traces of powers of X; evaluating at nilpotent e gives the complex constants ch(0), independent of the chosen nilpotent orbit point.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources