Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localization is left adjoint to global sections

Statement

For every κ∈h∗, Loc⁡κ:Aκ-Mod→QCoh⁡(X,Dκ) is left adjoint to Γκ:QCoh⁡(X,Dκ)→Aκ-Mod.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The TDO sheaf Dκ, its global algebra Aκ≅Γ(X,Dκ), a left Aκ-module V, and a quasi-coherent left Dκ-module M.

[F1]

Aκ≅Γ(X,Dκ) as filtered algebras (Global sections of twisted differential operators on the flag variety).

[F2]

Localization is the sheafification of W↦Dκ(W)⊗AκV, with restrictions induced from Dκ (Global sections and localization at a fixed infinitesimal character); the tensor-Hom correspondence for this construction is checked in step 2.1.

[F3]

The local PBW basis makes Dκ quasi-coherent as a left OX-module (PBW and integral line-bundle twisting for flag TDOs, proof steps 1.1–2.1). On an affine chart U=Spec⁡R, it is therefore the associated sheaf of Q=Γ(U,Dκ); its sections on D(f) are Qf (Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules). The Axiom of Choice is inherited from these suppliers.

Proof

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

On an affine chart U=Spec⁡R, put Q=Γ(U,Dκ). Right multiplication by Aκ commutes with left multiplication by R. Thus Q⊗AκV is an R-module, and for every f∈R there is a natural isomorphism Qf⊗AκV≅(Q⊗AκV)f,(q/fm)⊗v⟼(q⊗v)/fm. The inverse sends (q⊗v)/fm to (q/fm)⊗v; additivity and the balancing relations make both maps well-defined. By [F2] and [F3], the tensor presheaf on the distinguished-open basis of U is therefore the associated sheaf of Q⊗AκV. Its sheafification has that restriction on U, proving that Loc⁡κV is quasi-coherent. Left multiplication on its first factor gives its left Dκ-action.

2.1F2step 1.1construct

The tensor-Hom correspondence here follows directly from balancing. Given an Aκ-linear map V→Hom⁡Dκ(Dκ,M), write its value at v as hv and send d⊗v over W to hv∣W(d). The Aκ-action on Hom is (ah)(d)=h(da), so the rule is balanced, respects restrictions, and extends through sheafification to a Dκ-linear map. Conversely such a sheaf map gives hv by d↦ϕ(d⊗v). These constructions are inverse and natural, and step 1.1 places their source in the required quasi-coherent category.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

Evaluation at 1 identifies Hom⁡Dκ(Dκ,M) with Γ(X,M). A morphism is determined by the image of 1; conversely, each global section m defines the morphism d↦d m. Under this identification the Aκ-action is the one from [F1]. Substituting into step 2.1 gives the natural bijection Hom⁡Dκ(Loc⁡κV,M)≅Hom⁡Aκ(V,ΓκM), which is the asserted adjunction. Right exactness of localization follows because a left adjoint preserves cokernels.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources