Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Antidominant twists are D-affine and regular ones are conservative

Statement

Assume the flag-variety setup of Flag-variety twisted differential operators and their modules. If κ is antidominant, then every quasi-coherent left Dκ-module M satisfies Hi(X,M)=0(i>0). Moreover, Γ(X,−) is exact on the category of quasi-coherent left Dκ-modules. If κ is also regular, then Γ(X,M)=0 implies M=0. The antidominance and regularity conditions are independent hypotheses; regularity alone does not imply the vanishing assertion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, X=G/B, an ample line bundle OX(−η) for sufficiently dominant integral η, an antidominant (and, for conservativity, regular) κ, and a quasi-coherent left Dκ-module M.

[F1]

Every quasi-coherent OX-module is a filtered union of coherent submodules, and cohomology commutes with those filtered colimits (Quasicoherent modules are filtered unions of coherent subsheaves and cohomology commutes with these colimits).

[F2]

For coherent F and ample L, there is an integer n0 such that Hi(X,F⊗L⊗n)=0 for every i>0 and n≥n0 (Serre vanishing for coherent sheaves and ample twists).

[F3]

For coherent F and ample L, the twist F⊗L⊗n is globally generated for all sufficiently large n (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists, Global generation by the evaluation map).

[F4]

The natural injection M→M⊗L⊗V splits for antidominant κ, and the natural surjection M⊗V∗→M⊗L splits for regular antidominant κ, as sheaves of complex vector spaces; this is enough for the split maps on sheaf cohomology. Here L=OX(−η) and V=Γ(X,L)∗ (Ample translation maps split by central-character separation).

[F5]

For a sheaf of rings, the right-derived global sections on its module category agree with ordinary sheaf cohomology of the underlying module sheaf (Global sections on module sheaves have ordinary sheaf cohomology as derived functors).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4

Let i>0 and write M=lim→⁡jFj as the filtered union of coherent OX-submodules from [F1]. Fix one Fj. Choose a sufficiently dominant integral η so that Hi(X,Fj⊗L)=0 by [F2], with L=OX(−η). The composite Hi(X,Fj)→Hi(X,M)→Hi(X,M⊗L⊗V) factors through Hi(X,Fj⊗L⊗V) by naturality of the coevaluation map. This last group is Hi(X,Fj⊗L)⊗V=0 because V is finite-dimensional. By [F4], the map Hi(X,M)→Hi(X,M⊗L⊗V) is injective. Thus Hi(X,Fj)→Hi(X,M) is zero for every j. Taking the filtered colimit and using [F1] gives Hi(X,M)=0.

2.1F5step 1.1algebra

For every quasi-coherent left Dκ-module M, [F5] and step 1.1 give RqΓMod⁡(Dκ)(X,M)≅Hq(X,M)=0 for each q>0. Given a short exact sequence 0→M′→M→M′′→0 of quasi-coherent Dκ-modules, view it in the full module-sheaf category. Its derived-functor long exact sequence and the vanishing of R1Γ(M′) show that Γ(X,M)→Γ(X,M′′) is surjective; left exactness supplies exactness at the other terms. Hence Γ is exact on quasi-coherent Dκ-modules for antidominant κ.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

Now assume κ is regular antidominant and Γ(X,M)=0. For any coherent Fj⊆M, choose a sufficiently dominant integral η so that Fj⊗L is globally generated by [F3]. By the split surjection in [F4], Γ(X,M⊗L) is a direct summand of Γ(X,M⊗V∗)=Γ(X,M)⊗V∗=0; hence Γ(X,M⊗L)=0. The inclusion Fj⊗L↪M⊗L remains injective on global sections because Γ is left exact, so Γ(X,Fj⊗L)=0. A globally generated sheaf with no global sections is zero, hence Fj=0. All coherent subsheaves in [F1] vanish, so M=0. This applies the splitting to M, not to the arbitrary coherent OX-submodule.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources