How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The zero-boundary W1p space is separable and reflexive
Statement
Assume the ultrafilter lemma, Dependent Choice and Hahn–Banach. Let be bounded and open, , and let . Then , with the norm inherited from , is a separable reflexive real Banach space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ultrafilter lemma, Dependent Choice and Hahn–Banach; a bounded open , ; and .
The displayed formula is a norm, and weak differentiation is linear; hence is a linear embedding of into with its maximum product norm. Moreover, (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The Sobolev norm descends to equivalence classes, Linearity, locality, and commutation of weak derivatives).
is the norm closure of in , so it is a closed linear subspace (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
Under Hahn–Banach, a closed linear subspace of a reflexive Banach space is reflexive with its inherited norm; reflexive spaces are Banach spaces by definition (Closed subspaces of reflexive spaces are reflexive, Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map).
Under Countable Choice, rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of for (Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of for ).
A normed space is separable when it has a countable dense subset (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
Under Countable Choice, is complete for every (Riesz-Fischer completeness of for ).
A finite product of Banach spaces is Banach for its maximum product norm (Finite products of Banach spaces are Banach).
Under Countable Choice, is reflexive when (Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity).
For conjugate exponents , Hölder's inequality bounds each test pairing by the product of the corresponding and norms (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
A compact subset of has finite measure, and a continuous function on a compact metric space is bounded (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
Under the ultrafilter lemma, Dependent Choice and Hahn–Banach, a real Banach space is reflexive exactly when every bounded sequence has a weakly convergent subsequence (Reflexivity is equivalent to weak subsequential compactness of bounded sequences).
is countable and dense in , subsets and finite products of countable sets are countable, and in a metric space balls centered at a countable dense set with positive rational radii form a countable base. Indeed, for let , choose a dense center with , and choose rational with ; then ( is countably infinite, Both and are dense in , and every nonempty open subset of is uncountable, Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable, A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable, Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).
The hypotheses include the ultrafilter lemma, Dependent Choice and Hahn–Banach (The ultrafilter extension principle (UL/BPI), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain, The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF). Dependent Choice implies Countable Choice, used by [F4], [F6], [F8] and [F10] (Dependent choice implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Let be the countable rational box-step dense family in [F4]. Zero extension embeds isometrically in . Given , choose approximating its zero extension ; then . Thus the restrictions of are countable and dense in . Their finite products give a countable dense subset of ; balls centered there with rational radii form a countable base by [F12].
Let be Cauchy in . By [F1], the coordinate sequences and are Cauchy in for each . Countable Choice is available by [A1], so [F6] gives limits . Fix with compact support . By [F10], has finite measure and are bounded there; Hölder [F9] therefore lets both sides of pass to the limits and . Hence weakly for each , so and in its norm by coordinate convergence. Thus is Banach.
Each factor of is Banach by [F6], so the finite product is Banach for its maximum norm by [F7]. Let be a bounded sequence in . Its finitely many coordinate sequences are bounded in ; by [F8] and the bounded-sequence criterion [F11], successive subsequence extractions give one subsequence weakly convergent in every coordinate. Every bounded linear functional on is the sum of its restrictions to the coordinate factors, so this subsequence converges weakly in . Thus [F11] makes reflexive. By [F1], is a bounded linear isomorphism onto its image . The image is closed in : a convergent sequence in has Cauchy preimages by the lower norm bound in [F1], and they converge by step 1.2. Hahn–Banach and [F3] make reflexive. The inverse isomorphism preserves weak convergence, so [F11] shows that is reflexive.
By [F2], is a closed linear subspace of the reflexive Banach space from step 2.1. Hahn–Banach and [F3] therefore make reflexive and Banach with its inherited norm.
Let . The countable base from step 1.1 restricts to a countable base of . By [A1], Countable Choice selects one point from each nonempty member of this relative base; the resulting countable set meets every nonempty relatively open set and is dense in . Since is an isomorphism with equivalent norms by [F1], is separable by [F5].
Steps 3.1 and 4.1 establish that is a separable reflexive real Banach space with its inherited norm, as claimed.
Depends on
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The Sobolev norm descends to equivalence classes
- Linearity, locality, and commutation of weak derivatives
- Finite products of Banach spaces are Banach
- Closed subspaces of reflexive spaces are reflexive
- Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map
- Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
- Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable
- Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- $\mathbb{Q}$ is countably infinite
- Both $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}$ are dense in $\mathbb{R}$, and every nonempty open subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is uncountable
- Riesz-Fischer completeness of $L^p$ for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity
- Reflexivity is equivalent to weak subsequential compactness of bounded sequences
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has finite outer measure
- A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Dependent choice implies countable choice
- The ultrafilter extension principle (UL/BPI)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
152 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Haim Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer Universitext, 2011 (standard reference, not scraped)