How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every outgoing spherical Helmholtz mode is an outgoing Hankel mode
Statement
Let be a classical solution of for , where , and satisfy the outgoing condition in Sound-soft exterior Helmholtz problem for a spherical obstacle. For each , its orthogonal projection onto has the form with a fixed vector . Before imposing outgoingness, every degree- coefficient is a linear combination of and . This statement is modewise; it does not assert convergence of the partial-wave series as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A classical outgoing solution on and the spherical harmonic projections.
Sound-soft exterior Helmholtz problem for a spherical obstacle: and uniformly on the sphere.
Spherical harmonic modes are orthogonal, complete for continuous data, and have polynomial evaluation bounds: has eigenvalue for , and its orthogonal projection is defined in finite dimension.
Spherical Bessel and outgoing Hankel function conventions and Spherical Bessel and outgoing Hankel recurrences solve the radial Helmholtz equation: solves the radial equation, has outgoing asymptotic , and obeys for . At degree zero its defining formula is .
Outgoing spherical Hankel modes have positive flux and no positive-real zeros: and its conjugate have nonzero Wronskian for positive real argument.
Proof
Given: , , and the facts [F1]–[F4].
Fix and any . Define . Integrating the polar-coordinate Helmholtz equation against , using and the angular integration-by-parts identity from [F2], gives . Since this holds for every vector in the finite-dimensional space, the projected vector solves the same scalar radial equation componentwise.
The two functions and solve this equation and have nonzero Wronskian by [F3]–[F4]; hence at any fixed their value-derivative vectors form an invertible matrix. Solve this matrix equation to match a coefficient and its derivative at . The difference then solves a first-order system with continuous and zero initial data. On each compact interval where , integration gives (or the reversed integral for ); Grönwall's inequality gives . Extending across compact intervals proves every coefficient is a linear combination of the two modes.
Apply the uniform radiation condition [F1] to any and integrate it against ; its coefficient tends to zero because its magnitude is bounded by the uniform supremum times . At , direct differentiation of gives , and conjugation gives the corresponding incoming formula. For use the derivative recurrence in [F3]. In both cases the asymptotic gives . For the incoming conjugate, the same recurrence gives , whose magnitude tends to . Thus its coefficient in the mode combination from step 1.2 must vanish. Since this holds for every , the projected vector is for a fixed . The argument treats each degree separately and uses no interchange of the degree sum with the limit .
Depends on
- Sound-soft exterior Helmholtz problem for a spherical obstacle
- Spherical harmonic modes are orthogonal, complete for continuous data, and have polynomial evaluation bounds
- Outgoing spherical Hankel modes have positive flux and no positive-real zeros
- Spherical Bessel and outgoing Hankel function conventions
- Spherical Bessel and outgoing Hankel recurrences solve the radial Helmholtz equation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Plamen Stefanov, Scattering and Inverse Scattering in R^n, Chapter V, §§1.1–1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pierre Capel, Introduction to Scattering Theory, TALENT lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)