Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Outgoing spherical Hankel modes have positive flux and no positive-real zeros

Statement

For real z>0, let hℓ(1) be defined in Spherical Bessel and outgoing Hankel function conventions and set hℓ(2)(z)=hℓ(1)(z)‾. Then both solve the degree-ℓ spherical radial Helmholtz equation, are linearly independent, and Im⁡(hℓ(1)(z)‾(hℓ(1))′(z))=z−2. In particular, neither vanishes for z>0, and for k>0, r>0, r2Im⁡(hℓ(1)(kr)‾ ∂rhℓ(1)(kr))=1/k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The definitions and radial-solution result for spherical Bessel and Hankel functions.

[F1]

Spherical Bessel and outgoing Hankel function conventions: jℓ and hℓ(1) are obtained from sin⁡z/z and −ieiz/z using the same real differential operator (−z)ℓ(z−1d/dz)ℓ.

[F2]

Spherical Bessel and outgoing Hankel recurrences solve the radial Helmholtz equation: jℓ and hℓ(1) solve the same radial equation and jℓ(hℓ(1))′−jℓ′hℓ(1)=i/z2.

Proof

Given: Real z>0 and the functions in [F1]–[F2].

1.1F1F2algebra

Conjugating the definition in [F1] commutes with its real differential operator; applying that operator to ie−iz/z defines hℓ(2)=hℓ(1)‾, which solves the same real-coefficient radial equation as its conjugate. The sine identity gives jℓ=(hℓ(1)+hℓ(2))/2.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Put h=hℓ(1). Substitution of j=(h+hˉ)/2 into [F2] yields (hˉh′−hˉ′h)/2=i/z2. The left side is iIm⁡(hˉh′), giving the stated identity. If h(z)=0, its left side is zero, contradicting z−2>0; conjugation gives the same nonvanishing for hℓ(2). The nonzero Wronskian also proves linear independence.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

By the chain rule, ∂rh(kr)=kh′(kr). Multiplying the identity in step 2.1 by kr2 gives r2Im⁡(hˉ(kr)∂rh(kr))=r2k/(k2r2)=1/k.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources