Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Outgoing exterior Dirichlet uniqueness for the smooth combined-field geometry

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let Ω−,Γ,Ω+ have the C2 geometry of The combined-field operator for smooth-boundary Helmholtz scattering. If u∈H1(Ω+∩BR) for every ball containing Ω−‾ solves (Δ+k2)u=0 weakly for a real k>0, has zero trace on Γ, and satisfies lim⁡r→∞sup⁡ω∈S2∣r(∂r−ik)u(rω)∣=0, then u=0 on Ω+. The radiation condition refers to the smooth representative away from the boundary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, k>0 and u with the hypotheses above.

[F1]

Bounded C2 traces and compactly supported whole-space trace lifts are supplied by Smooth-boundary trace lifts and Sobolev Helmholtz layer extensions.

[F2]

On an exterior of any enclosing sphere, every classical outgoing solution has degree projections uℓ(r)=cℓhℓ(1)(kr) with fixed cℓ∈Hℓ (Every outgoing spherical Helmholtz mode is an outgoing Hankel mode). The degree spaces are orthogonal and their ordered projections converge in L2 for continuous sphere data (Spherical harmonic modes are orthogonal, complete for continuous data, and have polynomial evaluation bounds).

[F3]

For each degree r2Im⁡(hℓ(1)(kr)‾∂rhℓ(1)(kr))=1/k (Outgoing spherical Hankel modes have positive flux and no positive-real zeros).

[F4]

Distributionally harmonic functions have smooth harmonic representatives, and a harmonic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a connected open set vanishes everywhere, under Countable Choice (Weyl's lemma for the Laplacian, Unique continuation for harmonic functions, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F4givenalgebraconstruct

Set w(x,t)=ektu(x) on the connected open set Ω+×R⊂R4. Distributional differentiation gives Δx,tw=ekt(Δxu+k2u)=0. By [F4] it has a smooth harmonic representative. This implies u has a smooth Helmholtz representative: the distributional identity ∂tw=kw is also a classical identity for this representative, so w(x,t)=ektw(x,0), and comparison as distributions gives u(x)=w(x,0).

2.1F1step 1.1givenalgebra

Choose a so large that Ω−‾⊂Ba, and fix r>a. The annular domain Br∖Ω−‾ has inner boundary Γ and outer sphere. We derive the Green formula for this arbitrary weak solution from the trace/lift part of [F1]. A zero-trace H1 function supported in a boundary chart is approximable by smooth functions supported on its own side: flatten the chart and use v(z,t)=∫0t∂sv(z,s)ds, which gives ϵ−2∫0<t<2ϵ∣v∣2≤C∫0<t<2ϵ∣∂tv∣2→0. A cutoff removing t<ϵ therefore converges in H1, and subsequent interior mollification, followed by the finite chart partition, proves the claim. Hence the weak PDE applies to every H1 test with zero trace on both boundaries. For a compact inner trace lift Lg, define ⟨q+,g⟩=−∫(∇u⋅∇Lg‾−k2uLg‾). The preceding approximation makes this independent of the lift, and [F1] bounds it in H−1/2. For any test subtract its inner trace lift and an outer-sphere lift supported away from Γ; the remaining test has zero trace on both boundaries. The weak PDE kills that remainder, and classical integration by parts near the outer sphere is valid by step 1.1. Testing the resulting identity with u gives ∫Br∖Ω−‾(∣∇u∣2−k2∣u∣2)dx=∫∣x∣=r∂ruuˉ dS−⟨q+,γ+u⟩. The last term is zero by the zero trace. The left side is real, hence J(r)=r2Im⁡∫S2∂ru(rω)u(rω)‾dω=0. Only the original obstacle boundary has zero trace; no zero trace is assumed on the enclosing sphere.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

At this fixed r, both u(r,⋅) and ∂ru(r,⋅) are smooth, so their ordered harmonic projections converge in L2 by [F2]. Cauchy–Schwarz passes the inner product to the limit of finite orthogonal sums. By [F2]–[F3], this gives J(r)=lim⁡N→∞∑ℓ=0N∥cℓ∥22/k. Every summand is nonnegative and step 2.1 gives zero, so all cℓ=0. Completeness in [F2] now makes u(r,⋅)=0 in L2, hence pointwise by smoothness. This holds for every r>a, so u=0 on ∣x∣>a. No degree sum was interchanged with the radiation limit at infinity.

4.1F4step 1.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

The harmonic lift w of step 1.1 vanishes on (R3∖Ba‾)×R, a nonempty open subset of Ω+×R. The latter is connected because Ω+ is connected by hypothesis. [F4] gives w=0 everywhere there, hence u=w(⋅,0)=0 on Ω+.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources