Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Only one saturated step can lie over a fixed contracted prime in R[x]

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring and let PQ be prime ideals of R[x] with the same contraction p=PR=QR. Then P=pR[x], and there is no prime ideal strictly between P and Q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R and prime ideals PQ of R[x] with common contraction p.

[L2]

Prime ideals of a quotient and a localization correspond to prime ideals upstairs containing the kernel and avoiding the denominator set (Prime ideals of a quotient ring are exactly the prime ideals containing the ideal, Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).

[L3]

Over a field, every ideal of K[x] is principal, and every nonzero prime ideal of K[x] is maximal (For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Passing to the quotient by pR[x] and then localizing away from the nonzero elements of R/p, [L1] and [L2] identify the fiber over p with the prime spectrum of K[x]. Under this identification, the images of P and Q are comparable prime ideals of K[x], with the image of P properly contained in the image of Q.

L1L2given
2.1

By [L3], the only way two comparable primes in K[x] can be strictly nested is for the smaller one to be (0) and the larger one to be a nonzero maximal prime. Therefore the image of P in K[x] is zero. Contracting back through [L2], this means P=pR[x]. The same description also shows that no third prime can lie strictly between P and Q, because no third prime lies strictly between (0) and a nonzero prime in the PID K[x].

L2L3step 1.1
3.1

Hence over a fixed contracted prime in R[x] there is at most one extra strict step, and the lower prime in such a pair is exactly the extended prime pR[x].

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources