How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Only one saturated step can lie over a fixed contracted prime in R[x]
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be prime ideals of with the same contraction . Then , and there is no prime ideal strictly between and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and prime ideals of with common contraction .
The quotient is a domain, so it has a field of fractions ( is an integral domain if and only if is a prime ideal, The field of fractions of an integral domain).
Prime ideals of a quotient and a localization correspond to prime ideals upstairs containing the kernel and avoiding the denominator set (Prime ideals of a quotient ring are exactly the prime ideals containing the ideal, Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).
Over a field, every ideal of is principal, and every nonzero prime ideal of is maximal (For every field , is a principal ideal domain).
Proof
Passing to the quotient by and then localizing away from the nonzero elements of , [L1] and [L2] identify the fiber over with the prime spectrum of . Under this identification, the images of and are comparable prime ideals of , with the image of properly contained in the image of .
By [L3], the only way two comparable primes in can be strictly nested is for the smaller one to be and the larger one to be a nonzero maximal prime. Therefore the image of in is zero. Contracting back through [L2], this means . The same description also shows that no third prime can lie strictly between and , because no third prime lies strictly between and a nonzero prime in the PID .
Hence over a fixed contracted prime in there is at most one extra strict step, and the lower prime in such a pair is exactly the extended prime .
Depends on
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a principal ideal domain
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set
- Prime ideals of a quotient ring are exactly the prime ideals containing the ideal
- $R/P$ is an integral domain if and only if $P$ is a prime ideal
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §§18, 21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Melvin Hochster, Dimension theory and systems of parameters (standard reference, not scraped)