Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniform deviation for squared-projection slabs

Statement

Let X1,…,XN be independent random elements of Rp with common Borel probability law P. Let S1,…,Sm⊆[p] be nonempty coordinate sets with ∣Sj∣≤s, where m,s≥1, and define VSj:={u∈Rp:∥u∥2=1, ui=0 for i∉Sj}. For u∈VSj and t∈R, put Au,t:={x∈Rp:∣uTx∣2≤t} and PN(A):=N−1∑i=1N1{Xi∈A}. There is a universal constant C such that, for every 0<δ<1, P ⁣(max⁡1≤j≤msup⁡u∈VSjt∈R∣PN(Au,t)−P(Au,t)∣≤C[s+1N+log⁡(m/δ)N])≥1−δ. The same bound holds for the upper-tail sets {x:∣uTx∣2≥t}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Independent random elements, their common law P, a finite support family (Sj)j=1m, and 0<δ<1.

[F1]

Independent random elements: independence means the generated event sigma-algebras factor on finite intersections.

[F3]

Dominated convergence: pointwise convergence of indicators bounded by 1 passes to their probabilities.

[F4]

Continuity from below for measures: probabilities of increasing measurable sets converge to the probability of their union.

[F5]

Jensen's integral inequality for a probability measure: Jensen's inequality applies to the bounded empirical-process suprema below.

[F7]

The norm ∥v∥=⟨v,v⟩ induced by a real or complex inner product and Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs give the Euclidean norm and Cauchy--Schwarz inequality. The inner-product norm is definite, homogeneous, and satisfies the triangle inequality gives homogeneity and the triangle inequality, hence ∣∥v∥2−∥w∥2∣≤∥v−w∥2.

[F8]
[F9]

The rationals embed densely in the reals places a rational strictly between any two reals; Q is countably infinite gives a fixed enumeration of the rationals.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F7F9construct

The supremum is measurable. Fix S with d=∣S∣. By [F9], rational vectors supported in S can be enumerated by enumerating their finite tuples of rational indices in increasing sum; their nonzero normalizations form a countable subclass of VS. For u∈VS and each k≥1, choose the first rational tuple qk in that enumeration satisfying ∣(qk)i−ui∣<1/(4dk2) for i∈S. Such a tuple exists by rational density, and ∥qk−u∥2<1/(4k2), so qk≠0. With uk=qk/∥qk∥2, [F7] gives ∥uk−u∥2≤∣1−∥qk∥2∣+∥qk−u∥2≤2∥qk−u∥2≤k−2. For t≥0, choose the first rational tk∈(t+1/k,t+2/k) in the fixed enumeration. Cauchy--Schwarz yields ∣(ukTx)2−(uTx)2∣≤2∥x∥22k−2. Thus 1Auk,tk(x)→1Au,t(x) for every x, including boundary points: at equality the threshold margin 1/k eventually exceeds this error, while away from equality convergence preserves the strict sign. By [F3] their P-probabilities converge; finite empirical probabilities converge too. Negative thresholds give the empty set, already represented by rational thresholds. Hence the supremum equals that over the countable subclass of normalized rational vectors and rational thresholds, and is measurable. The first-element rules use no choice axiom.

1.2F1algebra

Fix a support S of size k≤s. Trace patterns of affine halfspaces on r fixed points are sign patterns of r affine hyperplanes in a (k+1)-dimensional parameter space. The number of open regions is at most ∑ℓ=0k+1(rℓ): adding one hyperplane creates at most the number of regions cut on that hyperplane, so induction on r and the dimension gives Pascal's recurrence and this sum. Weak-boundary traces are also counted, since on a finite point set a halfspace threshold can be increased slightly without changing its trace.

2.1step 1.2algebra

A slab Au,t with t≥0 is the intersection of the halfspaces uTx≤t and −uTx≤t in the same k coordinates; when t<0 it is empty. Hence its trace count on r points is at most (∑ℓ=0k+1(rℓ))2. For r≥q:=k+1, set x=q/r. Since xℓ≥xq for ℓ≤q, ∑ℓ=0q(rℓ)≤x−q(1+x)r≤(er/q)q. If r≥16q, then 2r>(er/q)2q: the logarithmic difference is positive at r/q=16 and has positive derivative thereafter. Thus r points cannot be shattered by the slab class, so its VC dimension is at most 16(k+1)≤16(s+1).

2.2F1F2F5F6step 1.1algebra

Let εi be independent uniform signs, independent of the sample, and let X1′,…,XN′ be an independent copy. Jensen's inequality [F5], conditional on the original sample, gives Esup⁡A∣PN(A)−P(A)∣≤Esup⁡A∣PN(A)−PN′(A)∣. Each pair (Xi,Xi′) is exchangeable, so independently swapping its coordinates with sign εi leaves the joint law unchanged. The triangle inequality then gives Esup⁡A∣PN(A)−P(A)∣≤2 Esup⁡A∣N−1∑i=1Nεi1A(Xi)∣. The ghost sample and signs exist on finite product spaces by [F6]; all suprema use the countable class from step 1.1.

2.3F1F2step 1.1algebra

Replacing one observation changes every empirical set probability by at most 1/N, so the supremum F changes by at most 1/N. In the Doob martingale of F, each conditional increment therefore has a range of width at most 1/N. If a random variable lies in an interval of width c, the log-mgf of its centered version has second derivative equal to a tilted variance at most c2/4; integrating twice gives Eeλ(Y−EY)≤eλ2c2/8. Iterating these bounds and optimizing the exponential Markov inequality yields P(F−EF>t)≤e−2Nt2.

3.1step 2.1algebra

On a fixed N-point sample the trace class is finite. For 0<ρ≤1, if M traces are pairwise separated by more than ρ in d(A,B)=PN(A△B), sample r=⌈3ρ−2log⁡(2M)⌉ coordinates uniformly with replacement. For a fixed pair the probability that the traces agree at all sampled coordinates is at most e−rρ2; a union bound over pairs shows that some coordinate sample distinguishes all M traces. Put D=16(s+1). If r<D, then M≤2r≤2D. If r≥D, step 2.1 bounds the trace count by (er/q)2q≤(er/D)2D, where q=∣S∣+1≤D; the inequality follows because a↦alog⁡(er/a) is increasing for 0<a≤r. Writing y=log⁡(M)/D, the choice of r gives r≤Cρ−2D(y+1) and hence y≤2log⁡(Cρ−2(y+1)). Put A=log⁡(Cρ−2)≥1. If y≥10, then log⁡(y+1)≤y/4, so y≤4A; if y<10, then y<10A. Thus y≤10A≤20log⁡(C0/ρ) for a universal C0. After increasing C0, the same bound covers r<D. A maximal ρ-separated set is a ρ-net, so N(ρ)≤(C0/ρ)20D.

4.1F8step 3.1algebra

To obtain the sign MGF bound used for chaining, for t≥0 put h(t)=t−tanh⁡t. Then h(0)=0 and h′(t)=1−sech⁡2t=tanh⁡2t≥0 by [F8]; the mean value theorem gives h(t)≥0. Put g(t)=t2/2−log⁡(cosh⁡t). Then g(0)=0 and g′(t)=h(t)≥0, so g(t)≥0; evenness extends the bound to every real t. Hence cosh⁡t≤et2/2. Conditional on the sample, the sign process ZA=N−1∑iεi1A(Xi) therefore has increments satisfying Eεeλ(ZA−ZB)≤eλ2d(A,B)2/(2N), by multiplying the independent sign MGFs with coefficients λ(1A(Xi)−1B(Xi))/N. Choose empirical L2 nets Tj at radii 2−j. Telescope each trace through its nearest net points; adjacent levels differ by at most 3⋅2−j in d. For L centered sub-Gaussian variables with common proxy σ2, Emax⁡ℓ≤L∣Wℓ∣≤σ2log⁡(2L) follows by Jensen's inequality applied to the log-sum-exp of eλWℓ and e−λWℓ, followed by minimization in λ. Thus the conditional expected supremum is at most CN(1+∑j≥12−jlog⁡(2N(2−j)N(2−j+1))). The finite trace class makes the sum terminate.

5.1step 3.1step 2.2step 4.1algebra

From step 3.1, log⁡N(ρ)≤20Dlog⁡(C0/ρ). Therefore the dyadic sum in step 4.1 is at most CD∑j≥12−jj+1≤C′D; the base trace contributes at most N−1/2 by Cauchy--Schwarz. Combining the symmetrization bound from step 2.2 with the chaining bound from step 4.1 yields Esup⁡A∣PN(A)−P(A)∣≤C′′(s+1)/N.

6.1step 5.1step 2.3algebra

Apply step 2.3 with t=log⁡(m/δ)/(2N) separately to each support class and take a union bound over its m supports. Combining with step 5.1 proves the displayed probability bound after increasing the universal constant C.

7.1F4step 6.1algebra∎

For any u,t, {x:∣uTx∣2<t}=⋃k≥1{x:∣uTx∣2≤t−1/k}, an increasing union. Continuity from below [F4] makes both P and PN probabilities converge to those of the strict lower-tail set. The deviation bound in step 6.1 holds at every threshold, so it passes to this limit. Taking complements gives the same bound for the upper weak tails {∣uTx∣2≥t}.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

123 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources