How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite geometric sum for phase-estimation amplitudes
Statement
For and , define with the empty sum . Then where is the canonical natural embedding of into .
For , , and integer , setting gives ; moreover exactly when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and, for the specialization, , , , and .
A finite sum is independent of its enumeration and splits over a disjoint union; for the initial segment , this gives (A finite sum in a commutative monoid indexed by an arbitrary finite set, Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule).
Complex powers satisfy and (Integer powers in the complex field).
The complex numbers form a field, so multiplication distributes over addition and every nonzero element has an inverse ( is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse ).
The canonical natural is defined recursively by , (The canonical natural of a field).
Induction holds on (The principle of mathematical induction).
The complex exponential satisfies , and exactly when (, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, , and exactly when , The complex exponential by its power series).
Proof
At , the sum is empty, so by [F1] and [F2].
Fix and assume ; this is the induction hypothesis.
By [F1] and [F2], , using distributivity in [F3] and the induction hypothesis [step 1.2]. Thus [F5] proves for every .
If , every summand is , so [F1] gives and . At , this equals by [F4]; if , the two successor recursions give . Induction [F5] proves for every . If , then , so divide the identity from step 2.1 by in the field [F3] to obtain .
In the QPE specialization, repeated use of [F6] and the power recursion [F2] gives . Since , [F6] gives , hence . The same kernel statement gives exactly when , equivalently , or .
Depends on
- $\exp(z+w)=\exp z\,\exp w$, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential
- $\mathbb C=\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field, every element is uniquely $a+bi$, and every nonzero element has inverse $(a-bi)/(a^2+b^2)$
- Integer powers in the complex field
- A finite sum in a commutative monoid indexed by an arbitrary finite set
- Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule
- The principle of mathematical induction
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
- The complex exponential by its power series
- $\ker(\exp)=2\pi i\mathbb Z$, and $\exp z=\exp w$ exactly when $z-w\in2\pi i\mathbb Z$
Used by
- Nearest-grid and tail estimates in phase estimation Example
- Circular-distance tail bound in phase estimation Lemma
- Exact zero-label probability for counting Lemma
- Nearest-grid probability in phase estimation Lemma
- Phase-estimation finite outcome law Lemma
- Second moment of the signed sine-window phase kernel Lemma
- Sine-window normalization and positive prefix weights Lemma
- Two nearest phase labels carry probability at least eight over pi squared Lemma
- Amplitude-estimation additive error and success probability Theorem
- Finite reversible-walk finding cost Theorem
- Phase estimation on a superposition of eigenspaces Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, §4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, version 6, §4.6 (standard reference, not scraped)