Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Phase estimation on a superposition of eigenspaces

Statement

Let U be a unitary on a nonzero finite-dimensional complex inner-product space H. Let Θ⊂[0,1) be its finite set of distinct eigenphases, and let Πθ denote the orthogonal projection onto the full eigenspace for eigenvalue exp⁡(2πiθ); degeneracies are grouped in one projection. For Q=2m, m≥1, define ay(θ):=Q−1∑j=0Q−1exp⁡(2πij(θ−y/Q)),Ky:=∑θ∈Θay(θ)Πθ. For a unit input ψ=∑θ∈ΘΠθψ, the unnormalized branch vector is Kyψ and py=∥Kyψ∥2=∑θ∈Θ∣ay(θ)∣2∥Πθψ∥2. If py>0, the conditional vector is Kyψ/py; if py=0, no conditional vector is assigned. The outcome law is an eigenspace-weighted mixture, while the conditional branch can retain coherent cross terms between distinct eigenspaces.

After discarding the phase register, the induced system instrument has branch maps Iy(X)=KyXKy† for operators X on H. More generally, for a density operator ρ on H⊗R, where R is a nonzero finite-dimensional reference space, the unnormalized reference-preserving branch after measuring and discarding the phase register is Iy(R)(ρ)=(Ky⊗IR)ρ(Ky†⊗IR). Its probability is tr⁡Iy(R)(ρ), and the conditional state is Iy(R)(ρ)/tr⁡Iy(R)(ρ) exactly when that probability is positive. With wθ=tr⁡((Πθ⊗IR)ρ), the reference outcome law is py=∑θ∈Θ∣ay(θ)∣2wθ, where wθ≥0 and ∑θwθ=1. If every eigenphase is on the Q-grid, then Ky=Πy/Q when y/Q∈Θ and Ky=0 otherwise, so the instrument branch is X↦KyXKy†. If any eigenphase is off-grid, its nonzero coefficient has modulus less than one in every Ky, so Ky†Ky is not a projection and the induced instrument is not the spectral projection instrument.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional unitary U, its spectral subspaces, the QPE circuit and access promise, a unit vector ψ, and optionally a density operator ρ on H⊗R.

[F1]

A unitary on a finite-dimensional inner-product space is normal: the isometry characterization gives U∗U=UU∗=I (For an endomorphism in finite dimension, preserving lengths, preserving inner products, carrying orthonormal bases to orthonormal bases, and T∗T=I are equivalent). The complex spectral theorem therefore gives an orthogonal decomposition into eigenspaces, with mutually orthogonal spectral projections summing to the identity (Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely, Self-adjoint and normal endomorphisms of a finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space).

[F13]

The algorithm's final readout branch is the Lüders map Z↦PyZPy for Py=∣y⟩⟨y∣⊗IH (Quantum phase estimation).

[F14]

Chronological layers L1,…,Ld denote ULd⋯UL1, and each local gate is embedded on its declared wires (Denotational semantics of a finite layered circuit). For linear maps A,B, the operator A⊗B is the linear map with (A⊗B)(u⊗v)=Au⊗Bv (Tensor products of finitely many linear maps).

[F15]

Tensor-map adjoints satisfy (A⊗B)†=A†⊗B†, so (Ky⊗IS)†=Ky†⊗IS for every finite reference factor S (Tensor maps preserve composition, identities, and adjoints).

[F16]

If X=[Xij] in the ancilla basis, the identity extension of Φ(X)=KyXKy† has blocks KyXijKy† by the block-amplification lemma. The sandwich (Ky⊗IS)X(Ky†⊗IS) has those same blocks because tensor maps act factorwise (Finite ancilla amplification is a well-defined block map, Tensor products of finitely many linear maps, Tensor maps preserve composition, identities, and adjoints).

[F4]

The inverse positive-sign QFT contributes matrix coefficient Q−1/2exp⁡(−2πixy/Q), and the eigenphase convention contributes exp⁡(2πijθ) on the j-th controlled-power branch (Positive-sign cyclic quantum Fourier transform, Quantum phase estimation, Exact binary QFT circuit correctness).

[F5]

The finite outcome kernel satisfies ∑y∣ay(θ)∣2=1 for every phase θ (Phase-estimation finite outcome law).

[F6]

Orthogonal projections satisfy Πθ∗=Πθ, ΠθΠϕ=0 for θ≠ϕ, and ∑θΠθ=IH (Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely, The orthogonal projection PWv is the W-component in V=W⊕W⊥).

[F7]

A completely positive map remains positive under every finite identity extension; a finite instrument has completely positive branches and its sum preserves trace (Completely positive maps, Finite instruments and conditional states).

[F9]

A density operator is nonnegative with trace one, and partial trace over a finite register discards that factor while retaining the reference system (Density operator, Partial trace over a finite tensor factor).

[F10]

For z≠1, the finite geometric amplitude is (1−zQ)/(1−z); exp⁡(w)=1 exactly for w∈2πiZ (Finite geometric sum for phase-estimation amplitudes, ker⁡(exp⁡)=2πiZ, and exp⁡z=exp⁡w exactly when z−w∈2πiZ).

[F11]

The phase-register computational-basis readout is a projective measurement with effects Py=∣y⟩⟨y∣⊗IH: they are self-adjoint idempotents, mutually orthogonal and complete (Finite registers and their ordered computational bases, Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations, Tensor products of finitely many linear maps, Finite projective measurements). For every vector v in the joint register, ⟨Pyv,v⟩=⟨Py2v,v⟩=⟨Pyv,Pyv⟩≥0, so each Py is nonnegative (Non-negative and positive operators). Together with completeness, this makes (Py)y a finite POVM (Finite POVMs and their outcome law).

[F12]

The spectral projections tensored with IR form a finite projective measurement, and their traces against a density operator are nonnegative weights summing to one (Tensor products of finitely many linear maps, Projective measurement outcome weights are probabilities, Finite projective measurements, Density operator).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3

By [F1], write H=⨁θ∈ΘEθ orthogonally with projections Πθ. By [F2], every eigenvalue has modulus one, and [F3] supplies its unique phase θ∈[0,1). Therefore ∑θΠθ=IH and ψ=∑θΠθψ.

2.1F4F14step 1.1algebra

On a phase-register basis branch ∣j⟩, the controlled powers act as Uj. On each eigenspace, UjΠθ=exp⁡(2πijθ)Πθ. Applying the inverse-QFT matrix in [F4], the coefficient of ∣y⟩ on Eθ is ay(θ); hence the post-readout Kraus operator on H is Ky=∑θay(θ)Πθ. Interpreting the chronological gate list as this operator uses [F14].

2.2F5F6step 1.1algebra

Orthogonality in [F6] gives Ky†Ky=∑θ∣ay(θ)∣2Πθ. Summing over y and using [F5] yields ∑yKy†Ky=∑θΠθ=IH. Consequently, for a unit vector ψ, ∥Kyψ∥2=∑θ∣ay(θ)∣2∥Πθψ∥2; all cross terms vanish because the eigenspaces are orthogonal. The weights ∥Πθψ∥2 are nonnegative and sum to one, so this is the eigenspace-weighted mixture law.

2.3F4F10step 1.1

If every θ∈Θ has Qθ=tθ∈{0,…,Q−1}, the finite geometric sum in [F10] and cyclic-character orthogonality give ay(θ)=1 for y=tθ and 0 otherwise. Distinct phases have distinct labels, so Ky is exactly the spectral projection for the eigenspace with label y, or zero if there is none.

3.1F7F9F11F13F14F15F16step 2.1constructalgebra

By linearity of the circuit, its pre-readout map from H to the phase register tensored with H is V:v↦∑z∣z⟩⊗Kzv, with the Kz from step 2.1. For any operator X on H⊗R, the joint output is (V⊗IR)X(V†⊗IR), using [F15] for the tensor adjoint. Applying the readout branch in [F13] gives ∣y⟩⟨y∣⊗(Ky⊗IR)X(Ky†⊗IR). Reorder the phase factor to the last position using [F11], then take its partial trace by the coordinate formula [F9]; the sole nonzero diagonal phase coordinate is y, so the result is exactly (Ky⊗IR)X(Ky†⊗IR). In particular this holds for the density operator ρ in the statement. To prove complete positivity, take any finite reference factor S and any nonnegative operator X on H⊗S. Its identity extension is X↦(Ky⊗IS)X(Ky†⊗IS) by [F16]. Writing A=Ky⊗IS, its quadratic form is ⟨AXA†v,v⟩=⟨XA†v,A†v⟩≥0, so every finite extension is positive and each branch is completely positive by [F7].

3.2F5F10givenstep 2.1algebra

If some phase θ is off-grid, then for every y, z=exp⁡(2πi(θ−y/Q))≠1 and zQ=exp⁡(2πiQθ)≠1 by [F10]. The geometric formula gives ay(θ)≠0 for every y. Since Q≥2 and [F5] says the Q squared moduli sum to one, each is strictly less than one. Thus Ky acts on this eigenspace by a scalar of modulus strictly between zero and one, so Ky†Ky is not a projection; the induced system instrument is not the spectral projection instrument.

4.1F7F8F9F12F14step 2.2step 3.1

For any finite-dimensional reference R (including R=C) and any operator X on H⊗R, [F8] and step 2.2 give ∑ytr⁡Iy(R)(X)=tr⁡(((∑yKy†Ky)⊗IR)X)=tr⁡X. Taking R=C proves that the system maps form an instrument on H. For a density ρ with arbitrary reference R, cyclicity and linearity also give py=tr⁡Iy(R)(ρ)=∑θ∣ay(θ)∣2tr⁡((Πθ⊗IR)ρ). By [F12], the weights tr⁡((Πθ⊗IR)ρ) are nonnegative and sum to one. Therefore the reference outcome law is the claimed mixture. When py>0, Iy(R)(ρ)/py is nonnegative of trace one, and when py=0 no conditional density is defined. For a pure input the conditional vector is Kyψ/py.

5.1F3F10step 2.1constructalgebra∎

To witness coherence for a permitted m≥1, let Q=2m and choose the witness space Hwit=C2 with orthonormal basis u0,u1. Define U on this entire space by Uu0=u0 and Uu1=exp⁡(πi/Q)u1, extending linearly. Each basis coefficient is multiplied by a unit scalar by [F3], so U preserves the norm and is unitary by For an endomorphism in finite dimension, preserving lengths, preserving inner products, carrying orthonormal bases to orthonormal bases, and T∗T=I are equivalent. Set ψ=(u0+u1)/2, which is unit. At output y=0, a0(0)=1, while [F10] and [F3] give a0(1/(2Q))=Q−1∑j<Qexp⁡(πij/Q)=2/[Q(1−exp⁡(πi/Q))]≠0: [F10] makes the denominator nonzero since Q(1/(2Q))=1/2∉QZ, and [F3] gives exp⁡(πi)=−1 for the numerator. Thus K0ψ=(u0+a0(1/(2Q))u1)/2, and its rank-one operator has the nonzero cross terms a0(1/(2Q))∣u1⟩⟨u0∣/2 and a0(1/(2Q))‾∣u0⟩⟨u1∣/2. The branch probability is positive because its u0 coefficient is nonzero, so conditioning preserves these cross terms.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

136 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources