Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational sphere homotopy below the first unstable degree

Statement

Assume AC. For m≥2 and 1≤i≤2m−2, π_i(S^m)⊗Q is Q if i=m and zero otherwise. Hurewicz after tensoring with Q is an isomorphism in all these degrees; in degree m its integral version is the standard orientation-generator isomorphism; no finiteness of the torsion groups is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; integers m≥2 and 1≤i≤2m−2; the integral orientation class of Sm representing a based map f:Sm→K(Z,m); and the strict homotopy fiber F of f in its actual mapping-path fibration.

[F1]

The standard CW pair (Sm,∗) has one relative cell of dimension m, so the high-relative-cells lemma gives (m−1)-connectivity (High relative cells do not change lower homotopy). Universal evaluation and the absolute Hurewicz theorem identify the degree-m homotopy map of the orientation class with an isomorphism, and the mapping-path fibration exact sequence shows the fiber F is m-connected (Eilenberg--Mac Lane spaces represent singular cohomology, Absolute Hurewicz theorem at the first nonzero degree, Mapping path factorization, Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration).

[F2]

The rational K(Z,m) calculation gives Ha(K(Z,m);Q)=0 for 0<a<2m, a≠m, and Hm(K(Z,m);Q)=Q; field duality with AC turns zero cohomology into zero homology below 2m (Rational cohomology of K(Z,n) through weak CW fiber comparison, Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field, The Axiom of Choice).

[F3]

The rational Serre sequence of F→Ef≃Sm→K(Z,m) has no outgoing differentials from column zero, and strong convergence identifies E0,b∞ with the bottom filtration subgroup of Hb(Sm;Q)=0 for m<b≤2m−2 (Homological Serre spectral sequence, Homology of spheres).

[F4]

Finite-range rational homology vanishing implies rational homotopy vanishing converts vanishing rational homology of the simply connected strict fiber F into vanishing rational homotopy through 2m−2.

[F5]

A weak CW approximation preserves homotopy and integral homology, hence rational homology; absolute Hurewicz on its m-connected CW source gives lower homology vanishing for F (CW approximation of an arbitrary space, Weak homotopy equivalences induce integral homology isomorphisms without choice, Absolute Hurewicz theorem at the first nonzero degree, Rationalization is exact and commutes with singular homology). Homotopy equivalence identifies the total-space homology with sphere homology (Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2

Give Sm its CW structure with a basepoint vertex and one m-cell. The high-relative-cells lemma applied to (Sm,∗) makes it (m−1)-connected, so the absolute first-Hurewicz theorem applies in degree m. Represent the integral orientation class of S^m by a based map f:S^m→K(Z,m). Universal evaluation and first Hurewicz make its degree-m homotopy map an isomorphism. Let F be its strict homotopy fiber. The exact sequence shows F is m-connected. The locally rederived rational cohomology calculation in the rational K(Z,n) calculation gives H^a(K(Z,m);Q)=0 for 0<a<2m, a≠m. Its full algebraic-dual identification with homology implies H_a(K(Z,m);Q)=0 in those degrees: a nonzero vector would have a nonzero detecting functional under AC. H_m(K(Z,m);Q)=Q also follows directly from integral first Hurewicz and the rationalization lemma. No finite-dimensional hypothesis is being inferred without proof. In particular H_{d+1}(K(Z,m);Q)=0 for m+1≤d≤2m−2.

2.1step 1.1F3F5

A weak CW approximation of F and integral first Hurewicz give H_b(F;Q)=0 for 0<b≤m. We prove the same for every m+1≤b≤2m−2 by induction. Suppose all lower positive fiber groups vanish, and consider E^2_{0,b}=H_b(F;Q) in the rational Serre sequence of F→E_f≃S^m→K(Z,m). There are no outgoing differentials from column zero. An incoming d_r, r≥2, has source (r,b−r+1). If b−r+1 is positive, the source is zero by lower fiber vanishing and the rationalization lemma; if it is negative there is no source. The remaining case r=b+1 has source H_{b+1}(K(Z,m);Q), which is zero by the preceding paragraph. Thus E^∞_{0,b}=H_b(F;Q). Strong convergence makes this the bottom filtration subgroup of H_b(E_f;Q)=H_b(S^m;Q)=0, so the fiber group is zero. This completes the induction.

3.1step 2.1F1F4∎

Apply the rational homology-vanishing corollary to F through degree 2m−2. Its positive rational homotopy groups vanish there. For i>m, the fiber exact sequence identifies π_i(F) with π_i(S^m), since K(Z,m) has zero groups in degrees i and i+1. Hence these sphere groups rationally vanish. Degrees below m vanish by connectivity, and degree m is the integral orientation generator by first Hurewicz. For m=2 the interval m+1≤b≤2m−2 is empty and the assertion is exactly first Hurewicz. In every other stated degree both the rationalized homotopy group and rational homology group are zero, so the rationalized Hurewicz map is their isomorphism. We assert torsion, not finiteness, of these homotopy groups.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

100 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources