Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regularized evaluation of the Weyl character quotient at one

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let λ∈Λ+ and let ρ be the Weyl vector (The Weyl vector rho for a chosen positive system), with mλ(μ)=dim⁡L(λ)μ the multiplicities of the finite-dimensional simple module L(λ).

Exponential values in (i) are complex exponentials (The complex exponential by its power series, exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential); for real arguments these agree with the real exponential used in (ii)--(iii). The pairing on h∗ is the complex-bilinear extension of the real form on E.

(i) For every ν∈h∗ and every t>0, ∑w∈W(−1)ℓ(w)e2t(wν,ρ)=∏α∈Φ+(et(ν,α)−e−t(ν,α)).

(ii) Consequently, for every t>0, ∑μmλ(μ)e2t(μ,ρ)=∏α∈Φ+(et(λ+ρ,α)−e−t(λ+ρ,α))∏α∈Φ+(et(ρ,α)−e−t(ρ,α)).

(iii) The left side of (ii) is a finite sum of exponentials, hence continuous at t=0 with value ∑μmλ(μ)=dim⁡L(λ), while each factor ratio (eta−e−ta)/(etb−e−tb) tends to a/b as t→0+ for a,b≠0; hence the right side of (ii) has the finite limit ∏α∈Φ+(λ+ρ,α)/(ρ,α) as t→0+.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a dominant integral weight λ∈Λ+, the module L(λ) with its multiplicities, the Weyl vector ρ, the positive system Φ+, the alternants A(ν) and the completed ring R with its group ring Z[P].

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it enters through the BGG numerator identity of [F2] (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Z[P]⊆R is the group ring with eμeν=eμ+ν, and A(ν)=∑w∈W(−1)ℓ(w)ewν is a finite alternant in Z[P] for ν∈P (The completed formal character ring, The Weyl alternation operator).

[F2]

ch⁡L(λ)⋅A(ρ)=A(λ+ρ) in Z[P] (The BGG Euler identity gives the Weyl numerator), and the denominator identity gives A(ρ)=eρ∏α∈Φ+(1−e−α)=∏α∈Φ+(eα/2−e−α/2) as an identity of finite sums whose exponents lie in P (The Weyl denominator identity).

[F3]

ch⁡L(λ)=∑μmλ(μ)eμ with finitely many nonzero integer coefficients, and ∑μmλ(μ)=dim⁡L(λ) because L(λ) is the direct sum of its weight spaces (The formal character of a finite-dimensional weight module, Finite-dimensional modules decompose into weight spaces).

[F4]

For t>0 and x∈h∗, evaluation eη↦exp⁡(2t(η,x)) is a homomorphism from the finite-support group ring to C: complex exponential is defined everywhere, satisfies exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡(z)exp⁡(w), and has exp⁡(0)=1. It agrees with real exponential when the pairings are real (The complex exponential by its power series, exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, Finite Weyl root system, lattice and chamber conventions).

[F5]

For w∈W and μ∈h∗ one has (wμ,ρ)=(μ,w−1ρ), and (−1)ℓ(w−1)=(−1)ℓ(w), so reindexing w↦w−1 preserves the signs (Finite Weyl root system, lattice and chamber conventions, The sign of the Weyl length is multiplicative).

[F6]

For every positive root α one has (ρ,α)>0 and (λ+ρ,α)>0 (Positive coroot pairings of a dominant integral weight).

[F7]

The real exponential is differentiable with derivative itself, hence continuous, and exp⁡(u)>0 for all u; finite sums and products of continuous real functions are continuous, finite products of convergent function limits may be computed factor by factor, and by the 0/0 form of l'Hôpital's rule the quotient (eta−e−ta)/(etb−e−tb) tends to a/b as t→0+ whenever b≠0 (The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡, The exponential is positive and satisfies exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x), The real exponential function and the number e by a power series, Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero, L'Hôpital's rule for the 0/0 form at finite or infinite, one-sided endpoints, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c), Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4F5algebraA1

Apply the multiplicative evaluation of [F4] with x=ν to the half-root form of the denominator identity in [F2]: the left side becomes ∑w∈W(−1)ℓ(w)exp⁡(2t(wρ,ν)) and the right side becomes ∏α∈Φ+(exp⁡(t(α,ν))−exp⁡(−t(α,ν))); using (wρ,ν)=(ρ,w−1ν) and reindexing w↦w−1, which preserves both W and the signs (−1)ℓ(w) by [F5], the left side equals ∑w∈W(−1)ℓ(w)exp⁡(2t(wν,ρ)), so the evaluated identity is exactly (i).

2.1F2F3F4F6F7step 1.1algebra

Apply the same evaluation with x=ρ to the numerator identity of [F2]; the left side becomes ∑μmλ(μ)exp⁡(2t(μ,ρ)) times A(ρ)'s value, the right side becomes the numerator product of (ii), and by step 1.1 with ν=ρ the value of A(ρ) is ∏α∈Φ+(exp⁡(t(ρ,α))−exp⁡(−t(ρ,α))), a product of positive factors for t>0: for u>0, the real exponential series gives exp⁡(2u)≥1+2u>1, and exp⁡(u)−exp⁡(−u)=exp⁡(−u)(exp⁡(2u)−1)>0 by [F4] and [F7]. Apply this with u=t(ρ,α)>0 from [F6]; division gives (ii).

3.1F3F7step 2.1algebra

The left side of (ii) is the finite sum ∑μmλ(μ)exp⁡(2t(μ,ρ)) of continuous functions of t by [F3] and [F7], so it is continuous at t=0 and its value there is ∑μmλ(μ)=dim⁡L(λ) by [F3].

4.1F6F7step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

For each positive root α the numerator and denominator in the factor ratio (et(λ+ρ,α)−e−t(λ+ρ,α))/(et(ρ,α)−e−t(ρ,α)) of the right side of (ii) vanish at t=0, their derivatives at t>0 are (λ+ρ,α)(et(λ+ρ,α)+e−t(λ+ρ,α)) and (ρ,α)(et(ρ,α)+e−t(ρ,α)), and the denominator derivative is strictly positive by [F6] and [F7]. By continuity the derivative quotient tends to 2(λ+ρ,α)/(2(ρ,α)); hence l'Hôpital's rule gives the factor limit (λ+ρ,α)/(ρ,α) as t→0+, and the finite product of these factor limits, namely ∏α∈Φ+(λ+ρ,α)/(ρ,α), is the limit of the right side of (ii); since (ii) holds for every t>0 and both sides have finite limits at 0+ by step 3.1 and by this factor computation, the two limits agree and the right side has the stated finite limit.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

102 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources