Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Riesz kernel size, difference and spherical-cancellation bounds

Statement

Assume Countable Choice, let n≥1 and 1≤j≤n, and let Kj(x)=cnxj/∣x∣n+1 with cn=Γ((n+1)/2)/π(n+1)/2 be the Riesz kernel of Riesz transforms on Euclidean space. Then:

  1. ∣Kj(x)∣≤cn∣x∣−n for every x≠0;
  2. with Cn:=cn 2n+1(3n+4) one has ∣Kj(x−h)−Kj(x)∣≤Cn ∣h∣ ∣x∣−(n+1) whenever x≠0 and ∣h∣≤∣x∣/2; and
  3. ∫Sn−1Kj(rω) dσ(ω)=0 for every r>0, where σ is the polar surface measure of Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma on the unit sphere Sn−1={ω∈Rn:∣ω∣=1}.

The constant Cn is explicit and depends only on n; at n=1 it reads C1=28c1=28/π. These are the raw size, first-difference and cancellation estimates that a later singular-integral treatment consumes; no Calderón–Zygmund kernel definition is invoked here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 1≤j≤n, and the Riesz kernel Kj(x)=cnxj/∣x∣n+1 with 0<cn<∞.

[F1]

The Riesz kernel Kj(x)=cnxj/∣x∣n+1 has 0<cn<∞, is smooth, odd and homogeneous of degree −n on Rn∖{0}, so Kj(rω)=cnr−nωj whenever r>0 and ∣ω∣=1. Riesz transforms on Euclidean space

[F2]
[F3]

For n≥1 and x∈Rn the Euclidean norm satisfies ∥x∥∞≤∥x∥2, hence ∣xj∣≤∥x∥2=∣x∣ for every coordinate j. The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n≥1 every norm N on Rn satisfies N(x)≤C∥x∥1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2

[F4]

Mean value theorem: a real function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on its interior has a point whose derivative equals the average rate of change. The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)

[F6]

Polar coordinates: for n≥1 and every Borel h:Rn→[0,∞], ∫Rnh dλn=∫0∞∫Sn−1h(rω)rn−1 dσ(ω) dr, and σ is a finite Borel measure on Sn−1. Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma

[F7]

Linear change of variables for Lebesgue measure, in particular λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λn(E) for invertible linear T. A linear map T of Rn sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λn(E) when T is invertible and T[E] Lebesgue null when it is not

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3givenalgebra

Fix x≠0. By [F1] the kernel is Kj(x)=cnxj∣x∣−(n+1), so ∣Kj(x)∣=cn∣xj∣∣x∣−(n+1)≤cn∣x∣−n by the coordinate bound ∣xj∣≤∣x∣ of [F3] and the positivity ∣x∣>0.

1.2F2F3givenalgebra

Fix x≠0 and h with ∣h∣≤∣x∣/2 and put A:=∣x−h∣. By [F2] applied to the Euclidean norm, ∣A−∣x∣∣≤∣h∣, so ∣x∣/2≤A≤3∣x∣/2; by [F3], ∣hj∣≤∣h∣ and ∣(x−h)j∣≤A≤3∣x∣/2. In particular A>0 and the kernel is defined at both arguments.

1.3F1F6F7givenalgebra

Let An:=∫Sn−1ωj dσ(ω) and H(x):=1{1<∣x∣<2} xj. The function H is Borel and ∫Rn∣H∣ dλn<∞; the map x↦−x is a linear bijection with ∣det⁡∣=1, so [F7] gives ∫RnH(−x) dλn(x)=∫RnH(x) dλn(x), while H(−x)=−H(x) gives ∫H dλn=−∫H dλn, that is, ∫RnH dλn=0. On the other hand [F6] applied to the nonnegative and the negative part of H gives ∫RnH dλn=∫12rn−1(∫Sn−1rωj dσ(ω))dr=An∫12rn dr with ∫12rn dr>0, so An=0. Hence for every r>0 the homogeneity [F1] gives ∫Sn−1Kj(rω) dσ(ω)=cnr−n∫Sn−1ωj dσ(ω)=cnr−nAn=0.

2.1step 1.2F1F4F5givenalgebra

Keep x≠0 and ∣h∣≤∣x∣/2 as in 1.2, put B:=∣x∣ and ψ(s):=s−(n+1); by [F5] with m=n+1≥2≥1 one has ψ′(s)=−(n+1)s−(n+2) on (0,∞). The interval with endpoints A and B lies in [B/2,∞) by 1.2. If A=B, then ∣ψ(A)−ψ(B)∣=0 and the following bound is immediate. If A≠B, [F4] on the interval with ordered endpoints min⁡(A,B)<max⁡(A,B) gives a point s with ψ(A)−ψ(B)=ψ′(s)(A−B) and therefore ∣ψ(A)−ψ(B)∣≤(n+1)(B/2)−(n+2)∣A−B∣≤(n+1)2n+2∣h∣B−(n+2). Insert ±(x−h)jψ(B) into the difference and expand: Kj(x−h)−Kj(x)=cn[(x−h)j(ψ(A)−ψ(B))−hjψ(B)], so by 1.2 and the preceding bound, and by ψ(B)=B−(n+1), ∣Kj(x−h)−Kj(x)∣≤cn[32(n+1)2n+2+2n+1]∣h∣B−(n+1)=Cn∣h∣∣x∣−(n+1) with Cn=cn2n+1(3n+4), since 32(n+1)2n+2=3(n+1)2n+1 and 3(n+1)+1=3n+4.

3.1step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1given∎

The three assertions are proved: ∣Kj(x)∣≤cn∣x∣−n for x≠0 is 1.1; the difference bound with the stated constant is 2.1, whose hypothesis ∣h∣≤∣x∣/2 keeps both arguments nonzero as recorded in 1.2; and the vanishing of every spherical integral ∫Sn−1Kj(rω) dσ(ω), r>0, is 1.3.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources