Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Riesz transform is the principal value of its kernel, with the matching constant

Statement

Assume Countable Choice, use the e−2πixξ convention, and let Kj(x)=cnxj/∣x∣n+1 with cn=Γ((n+1)/2)/π(n+1)/2 be the Riesz kernel of Riesz transforms on Euclidean space. Then for every Schwartz function f∈S(Rn):

  1. the truncated integrals ∫∣y∣>εKj(y)f(x−y) dy converge as ε↓0 for every x∈Rn, with a limit that is continuous in x; and
  2. that continuous function is a representative of the L2 class Rjf, whose Fourier multiplier is −iξj/∣ξ∣.

Existence of the principal value is asserted only for Schwartz f, pointwise in x; no almost-everywhere convergence for general L2 or Lp inputs is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 1≤j≤n, the Riesz kernel Kj, the symbol mj(ξ)=−iξj/∣ξ∣ for ξ≠0 with mj(0)=0, and the operator Rj=F2−1MmjF2 on L2(Rn).

[F1]

The Riesz kernel is Kj(x)=cnxj/∣x∣n+1 with 0<cn<∞, smooth and odd on Rn∖{0}, and ∣Kj(x)∣≤cn∣x∣−n; the operator Rj is the bounded L2 operator with symbol mj. Riesz transforms on Euclidean space

[F2]

For S(T):=∫0Tsin⁡uudu, one has S(T)→π2, ∣S(T)∣≤3 for all T≥0, and ∣∫ABsin⁡uudu∣≤2/A when 1≤A<B. Thus ∣∫ABsin⁡uudu∣≤6 for all 0<A<B: use ∣S(B)∣+∣S(A)∣≤6 if A<1, and the tail bound if A≥1. The sine integral under Countable Choice: uniform bounds and the value pi/2

[F3]

Polar coordinates: ∫Rnh dλn=∫0∞∫Sn−1h(rω)rn−1dσ(ω) dr for nonnegative Borel h and, by splitting real and imaginary parts into their positive and negative parts, for integrable complex Borel h, and the finite Borel measure σ is uniquely determined by this property. Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma

[F4]

Vm(1)=πm/2/Γ(m/2+1) for m≥1, and volumes scale as Vm(ρ)=Vm(1)ρm. The closed form for the volume of the unit n-ball

[F5]

Fubini for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product. Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product

[F6]

Dominated convergence. Dominated convergence

[F7]

(u∗φ)(x)=⟨uy,φ(x−y)⟩ defines the tempered convolution for u∈S′ and Schwartz φ. Convolution of a tempered distribution with a schwartz function

[F8]

F(u∗φ)=(Fu)(Fφ) for u∈S′(Rn) and Schwartz φ. Fourier transform converts allowed tempered convolutions to products

[F9]

Fourier transformation is a topological automorphism of S′(Rn), hence injective. Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of tempered distributions

[F10]

⟨Fu,φ⟩=⟨u,Fφ⟩ with no conjugate on the right-hand side. Fourier transform of a tempered distribution

[F11]

For a continuous curve h:[a,b]→R2 differentiable on (a,b), the bound ∣h′(t)∣≤D implies ∣h(b)−h(a)∣≤D(b−a). Identify C with R2 when applying this inequality. The mean value inequality: if f:[a,b]→Rm is continuous and differentiable on (a,b) with ∥f′∥2≤M, then ∥f(b)−f(a)∥2≤M(b−a)

[F12]

The real one-variable chain rule applies to compositions of real scalar functions; below it is applied separately to the real and imaginary parts of each coordinate section of f. The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c)

[F13]

Schwartz seminorms: for every integer N≥0 there is a finite constant CN(φ) with ∣φ(x)∣≤CN(φ)(1+∣x∣)−N. Schwartz space and its seminorms

[F15]

The Gamma function satisfies Γ(1)=1. The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F6F11F12F13

Fix f∈S(Rn) and x∈Rn. Write gx(y):=f(x−y)−f(x), and put Dk:=sup⁡z∣∂kf(z)∣<∞ for 1≤k≤n by [F13], and set M:=∑k=1nDk. Join x to x−y by the n coordinate segments with successive endpoints z(k)=x−∑ℓ=1kyℓeℓ, where z(0)=x. On the k-th segment, the real one-variable chain rule [F12] on both components gives (d/dt)f(z(k−1)−tykek)=−yk∂kf(z(k−1)−tykek) for 0<t<1; this follows from the definition of the coordinate partial derivative and is valid also when yk=0, when the curve is constant. Applying [F11] to this complex curve viewed in R2 bounds its increment by Dk∣yk∣. Telescoping gives ∣gx(y)∣≤∑kDk∣yk∣≤M∣y∣ for every y. Hence on ∣y∣<1 the bound ∣Kj(y)gx(y)∣≤cnM∣y∣1−n is integrable in n dimensions, while 1+∣y∣≤(1+∣x∣)(1+∣x−y∣) and the Schwartz bound [F13] with N=n+2 give ∣f(x−y)∣≤Cn+2(f)(1+∣x∣)n+2(1+∣y∣)−n−2. Thus on ∣y∣>1, ∣Kj(y)f(x−y)∣≤cnCn+2(f)(1+∣x∣)n+2∣y∣−n−2 is integrable. Since ∫ε<∣y∣<1Kj(y)f(x) dy=0 by oddness of Kj and symmetry of the annulus, ∫∣y∣>εKj(y)f(x−y) dy=∫ε<∣y∣<1Kj(y)gx(y) dy+∫∣y∣>1Kj(y)f(x−y) dy, and ε↓0 in the first term yields the absolutely convergent limit J(x):=∫∣y∣<1Kj(y)gx(y) dy+∫∣y∣>1Kj(y)f(x−y) dy. For xk→x, the sequence (xk) is bounded, so the tail constants (1+∣xk∣)n+2 have a common finite bound. This and the common small-ball bound cnM∣y∣1−n supply integrable dominators for [F6]; continuity of f gives pointwise convergence in both integrals, hence J(xk)→J(x).

1.2F1F3

For 0<ε<R and ξ≠0 put Λε,R(ξ):=∫ε<∣y∣<RKj(y)e−2πiy⋅ξdy. The cosine part of the integrand is odd in y, so it integrates to zero on the symmetric annulus, and Kj(y)=cnyj/∣y∣n+1 gives Λε,R(ξ)=−icn∫ε<∣y∣<Ryj∣y∣n+1sin⁡(2πy⋅ξ) dy. Polar coordinates [F3] turn this into Λε,R(ξ)=−icn∫εRdrr∫Sn−1ωjsin⁡(2πr ξ⋅ω) dσ(ω).

1.3F3F14

For ξ≠0 one has ∫Sn−1sgn⁡(ξ⋅ω)ωj dσ(ω)=Anξj∣ξ∣ with An:=∫Sn−1∣ω1∣ dσ: by [F3] the measure σ is invariant under the orthogonal map ω↦Rω, so substituting ω=RTu for an orthogonal map with R(ξ/∣ξ∣)=e1 (take R=I if v:=ξ/∣ξ∣=e1, and otherwise take R=I−2wwT/∣w∣2 with w=v−e1) and reflecting uk↦−uk for k≠1 (which preserves sgn⁡(u1)u1 and kills the other components by oddness) leaves only An(RTe1)j=Anξj/∣ξ∣.

1.4F3F4F5F14F15

An=2π(n−1)/2/Γ((n+1)/2): compute C:=∫Bn∣x1∣ dx twice. Polar coordinates [F3] give C=∫01rndr⋅An=An/(n+1); for n≥2, slicing at x1=t gives, by [F5], [F14] and [F4], C=∫−11∣t∣Vn−1(1)(1−t2)(n−1)/2dt=2Vn−1(1)/(n+1)=2π(n−1)/2/((n+1)Γ((n+1)/2)), hence An=(n+1)C=2Vn−1(1)=2π(n−1)/2/Γ((n+1)/2). For n=1 the sphere is S0={−1,1}: the defining identity of [F3], applied to functions supported in the annulus 1<∣x∣<2, shows that the measure σ is the counting measure δ−1+δ1, so A1=∫S0∣ω1∣ dσ=1+1=2, while 2π0/Γ(1)=2 by Γ(1)=1 of [F15]. Hence An=2π(n−1)/2/Γ((n+1)/2) for every n≥1, and cnAnπ/2=1 by cancellation of Γ((n+1)/2) and π(n+1)/2.

2.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4F2F6

In 1.2 let R=1/ε and ε↓0. For each fixed ω∈Sn−1 with ξ⋅ω≠0, the substitution u=2πr(ξ⋅ω) (with orientation, [F2]) gives ∫ε1/εsin⁡(2πr ξ⋅ω)rdr→π2sgn⁡(ξ⋅ω); when ξ⋅ω=0 the integral is zero. In all cases [F2] bounds its absolute value by 6, uniformly in ε and ω. Since the sphere has finite measure, [F6] on Sn−1 gives lim⁡ε↓0Λε,1/ε(ξ)=−icn∫Sn−1ωjπ2sgn⁡(ξ⋅ω) dσ(ω)=−icnπ2Anξj∣ξ∣=−iξj∣ξ∣ by 1.3 and the constant identity of 1.4.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F5F6F10

Define the tempered distribution Wj by the symmetric principal-value pairing ⟨Wj,φ⟩:=lim⁡ε↓0∫ε<∣y∣<1/εKj(y)φ(y) dy for φ∈S; the two-piece bound of 1.1 shows the limit exists, is finite, and is Schwartz-continuous. By [F10], ⟨FWj,φ⟩=⟨Wj,φ^⟩=lim⁡ε↓0∫ε<∣y∣<1/εKj(y)φ^(y) dy; the double integrand is absolutely integrable since ∫ε<∣y∣<1/ε∣Kj(y)∣ dy∫Rn∣φ(ξ)∣ dξ<∞, so [F5] applies, giving ∫ε<∣y∣<1/εKj(y)φ^(y) dy=∫Rnφ(ξ)Λε,1/ε(ξ) dξ. By 2.1 the bracket converges to −iξj/∣ξ∣ pointwise off the null set {ξ=0}, and by the uniform bound of 2.1 it is dominated by a constant times ∣φ(ξ)∣; [F6] therefore yields ⟨FWj,φ⟩=∫Rnφ(ξ)(−iξj/∣ξ∣) dξ, i.e. FWj=mj as tempered distributions.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F1F7F8F9∎

By [F8] and 3.1, F(Wj∗f)=(FWj)(Ff)=mjf^; by [F1] the L2 class Rjf has Fourier transform mjf^ as well, so the two tempered distributions agree and [F9] gives Wj∗f=Rjf. By [F7] and the definition of Wj in 3.1, the value (Wj∗f)(x)=⟨Wj,f(x− ⋅ )⟩ is exactly the limit J(x) of 1.1; the continuity in 1.1 therefore makes J a continuous representative of the L2 class Rjf, and the truncated integrals ∫∣y∣>εKj(y)f(x−y)dy converge to it at every x.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

122 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources