Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Invariants separate a stable point from a disjoint closed invariant subset

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group acting algebraically on an affine algebraic set X, with categorical quotient π:X→X/ ⁣/G (Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient). Let Z⊆X be closed and G-stable, and let x∈X with π(x)∉π(Z). Then there exists f∈C[X]G with f(x)≠0 and f∣Z=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a complex reductive affine algebraic group G acting on an affine algebraic set X; the categorical quotient π:X→X/ ⁣/G; a closed G-stable subset Z⊆X and a point x∈X with π(x)∉π(Z).

[F1]

Closed images of closed invariant subsets. For every closed G-stable subset Y⊆X the morphism Y/ ⁣/G→X/ ⁣/G is a closed immersion, and for closed G-stable Y,Y′⊆X one has π(Y∩Y′)=π(Y)∩π(Y′) (Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient, clause (iv)).

[F2]

Separation by regular functions. In an affine algebraic set, a point outside a closed subset is separated from it by a regular function: if q is a maximal ideal of a coordinate ring A and C⊆Spec⁡A is the closed set of a radical ideal a⊈q, then there is g∈a with g(q)≠0 (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

The image π(Z) is closed in X/ ⁣/G: since Z is closed and G-stable, [F1] makes Z/ ⁣/G→X/ ⁣/G a closed immersion; its image is π(Z), because π∣Z is surjective onto Z/ ⁣/G by the quotient theorem and the underlying set of the closed immersion is that image.

2.1F2step 1.1

By hypothesis π(x)∉π(Z), so in the affine algebraic set X/ ⁣/G the point π(x), viewed as the maximal ideal mπ(x) of C[X/ ⁣/G]=C[X]G, does not contain the radical ideal a of the closed set π(Z); by [F2] there is fˉ∈a⊆C[X]G with fˉ(π(x))≠0 and fˉ∣π(Z)=0.

3.1step 2.1∎

Put f=π∗(fˉ)=fˉ∘π∈C[X]G. Then f(x)=fˉ(π(x))≠0, and for z∈Z one has f(z)=fˉ(π(z))=0 because π(z)∈π(Z); hence f∣Z=0. This is the required invariant.

Remarks

  • This is the first step of Brion's proof of Proposition 1.26 (printed pp. 9-10): the closedness of π(Z) is clause (iv) of the affine quotient theorem, and the separating function is produced on the quotient and pulled back along π.
  • AC is inherited from the quotient and Nullstellensatz suppliers; the pullback construction itself is choice-free.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources