How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Invariants separate a stable point from a disjoint closed invariant subset
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group acting algebraically on an affine algebraic set , with categorical quotient (Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient). Let be closed and -stable, and let with . Then there exists with and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a complex reductive affine algebraic group acting on an affine algebraic set ; the categorical quotient ; a closed -stable subset and a point with .
Closed images of closed invariant subsets. For every closed -stable subset the morphism is a closed immersion, and for closed -stable one has (Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient, clause (iv)).
Separation by regular functions. In an affine algebraic set, a point outside a closed subset is separated from it by a regular function: if is a maximal ideal of a coordinate ring and is the closed set of a radical ideal , then there is with (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).
Proof
The image is closed in : since is closed and -stable, [F1] makes a closed immersion; its image is , because is surjective onto by the quotient theorem and the underlying set of the closed immersion is that image.
By hypothesis , so in the affine algebraic set the point , viewed as the maximal ideal of , does not contain the radical ideal of the closed set ; by [F2] there is with and .
Put . Then , and for one has because ; hence . This is the required invariant.
Remarks
- This is the first step of Brion's proof of Proposition 1.26 (printed pp. 9-10): the closedness of is clause (iv) of the affine quotient theorem, and the separating function is produced on the quotient and pulled back along .
- AC is inherited from the quotient and Nullstellensatz suppliers; the pullback construction itself is choice-free.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22 (standard reference, not scraped)