How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective GIT quotient for a linear action
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the affine invariant-theory and quotient suppliers. Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group, a finite-dimensional rational -module, a -stable closed projective algebraic set, its homogeneous coordinate ring (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and . Put and (Semistable and stable points for a linearization). Then:
(i) is a finitely generated graded -algebra with when (and when ), and is a projective -scheme of finite type;
(ii) and are open -stable subsets of , and is the union of the affine -stable charts for ;
(iii) the chart morphisms of Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action glue to a -invariant morphism that is a good quotient in the sense of Good and geometric quotients for group actions; is surjective, , and for one has if and only if ;
(iv) is open in , , and is a geometric quotient; a point is stable if and only if is finite and is closed in , equivalently if and only if is finite and lies in a chart , , in which all -orbits are closed; and if then is a geometric quotient of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group , a finite-dimensional rational -module , a -stable closed projective algebraic set with homogeneous coordinate ring and invariant part , and .
Finite generation of invariants. For , is a finitely generated graded -algebra with and finite-dimensional graded pieces, and the action of is rational by graded algebra automorphisms; hence is a finitely generated graded -algebra with . (Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated, homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set)
Projectivity of the Proj. A finitely generated graded -algebra with and finite-dimensional graded pieces has a projective -scheme of finite type; in particular is projective of finite type. (Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective)
The affine chart quotients. For every homogeneous of positive degree the chart is affine and -stable with , and the affine quotient morphism is a good quotient; the various agree on overlaps. (Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action, Nonvanishing charts of sections of an ample linearization are affine)
Locality and the affine picture. Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical; a good quotient is geometric exactly when its fibres are the orbits. Every fibre of the affine categorical quotient of an affine -variety contains a unique closed orbit, for an affine -variety the stable locus (closed orbit and finite stabilizer) is characterized by the affine stable-locus theorem, with geometric quotient onto its image, and a closed subgroup of the finite-type group is finite exactly when its dimension is zero. (Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients, The stable locus has a geometric quotient, Stable points of an affine action, Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient)
Orbit and stabilizer behaviour. The function is upper semicontinuous and is lower semicontinuous; for every point one has , the orbit closure is the union of and of orbits of strictly smaller dimension, every orbit closure contains a closed orbit, and every orbit of minimal dimension in a -stable closed set is closed. (Semicontinuity of stabilizer and orbit dimension, Orbit dimension and closed orbits for complex group actions, Global and local dimension of classical varieties)
Good-quotient clauses. A good quotient is -invariant and surjective, satisfies , maps closed -stable subsets to closed subsets and disjoint closed -stable subsets to disjoint subsets, and is categorical; a geometric quotient has the -orbits as its fibres, with the quotient topology and sheaf conditions. (Good and geometric quotients for group actions, Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties)
Separate a point from a disjoint invariant closed subset. For an affine reductive-group action with categorical quotient , if is closed and invariant and , there is an invariant regular function with and (Invariants separate a stable point from a disjoint closed invariant subset).
Proof
The invariant ring and the target. If , its homogeneous coordinate ring is zero, the invariant ring and every localized chart ring are zero, both loci and every quotient target are empty, and all conclusions hold with the empty morphisms. Assume henceforth . By [F1] is a finitely generated graded -algebra with and finite-dimensional graded pieces; by [F2] the scheme is projective of finite type over . This is assertion (i).
The semistable locus. By definition exactly when for some homogeneous invariant of positive degree, i.e. exactly when lies in one of the charts with ; each such chart is open, affine and -stable by [F3], so is open and -stable and covered by the charts .
Gluing the chart morphisms. The chart morphisms of [F3] agree on overlaps by the compatibility assertion of [F3]; since the with cover and the cover , they glue to a -invariant morphism whose restrictions are the good quotients . For any positive-degree invariants , the function on is the pullback of the same fraction on ; it is nonzero precisely on and on , respectively. Thus , since the cover , so the chart maps really are target restrictions of . By [F4] the good-quotient property is local on the target, so is a good quotient; in particular by [F6] it is surjective, its pullback identifies with , and images of closed -stable (respectively disjoint closed -stable) subsets are closed (respectively disjoint).
Closed charts and invariant vanishing. Call a chart , , closed if every -orbit contained in is closed in , and let be the union of the closed charts; this is an open -stable subset of . If is closed and , then is an open -stable subset of , so every orbit contained in is closed in as well. For a homogeneous invariant section , if then its closed zero locus is -stable and contains , hence also contains every . Equivalently, if such a lies in a chart and , then , so .
The stable locus lies in the closed charts. Let and choose with (step 1.2). The set is closed and -stable in by [F5] and is disjoint from the closed orbit , whose stabilizers are conjugate to the finite group . Since and are disjoint closed -stable subsets of the affine chart, the good-quotient property [F4] gives . Thus , and the affine quotient separation lemma [F7] gives with and . By [F3] write with homogeneous. Choose and put ; then is homogeneous invariant of positive degree and . Its chart satisfies , and if then , so ; hence every point of has finite stabilizer. If an orbit were not closed in , its boundary in would contain a point ; by [F5] the orbit has dimension strictly smaller than . But every point of has finite stabilizer, so every orbit in has dimension by the orbit-stabilizer formula [F5], a contradiction. Thus is a closed chart containing . Every stable point lies in such a chart, so .
Points of closed charts with finite stabilizer are stable. Let with finite and choose a closed chart containing . The fibre is closed in and contains , so it contains . Since and by step 2.1, the fibre lies in . Thus every lies in the closure of computed in , and closedness of the orbit in that chart forces . Hence is closed in and . With step 2.3 this gives .
Fibres of . Let . If , choose with ; then and, since restricts by step 2.1, , so the closures of and in meet by the unique-closed-orbit property of the affine fibre ([F4]), hence their closures in meet. Conversely let and choose with ; by the vanishing observation of step 2.2 the points also lie in , and lies in both closures computed in , so by continuity and . This proves (iii).
Openness and the geometric quotient. By step 3.1 the stable locus is . The union of charts is open and -stable, and is open in by upper semicontinuity of ([F5]); hence is open in , and it is -stable because stabilizers of points in one orbit are conjugate. On a closed chart the affine quotient of [F3] is a good quotient whose fibres contain a unique closed orbit ([F4]); since every orbit in is closed, each fibre is a single orbit, so is a geometric quotient. These geometric quotients agree on overlaps by [F3], so by locality of the geometric-quotient property ([F4]) they glue to a geometric quotient , where is the union of the open sets over the closed charts, hence open in . The closed -stable subset is mapped by the quotient to a closed subset of by clause (iv) of [F6], so is open in and hence in ; and because the fibres of are the orbits and is -stable. The restriction of the geometric quotient to the open -stable subset is again a geometric quotient onto by locality, so is a geometric quotient. This proves (iv); if then and the same argument shows that is a geometric quotient of .
Assertions (i)-(iv) are established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii) in step 1.2, (iii) in steps 2.1 and 3.2, and (iv) in steps 2.3, 3.1 and 4.1.
Remarks
- No Hilbert--Mumford criterion. Semistability and stability are read off from invariant sections and orbit closures only; no numerical criterion is stated or used.
- The linearization is a hypothesis. The action on and hence the quotient come from the linearized structure of ; no item constructs a linearization of an arbitrary ample sheaf.
Depends on
- The invariant section ring and the projective GIT quotient
- Semistable and stable points for a linearization
- Good and geometric quotients for group actions
- Invariants of a localization at an invariant element
- Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients
- Nonvanishing charts of sections of an ample linearization are affine
- Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective
- Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action
- Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient
- The stable locus has a geometric quotient
- Semicontinuity of stabilizer and orbit dimension
- Orbit dimension and closed orbits for complex group actions
- The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring
- Invariants of a finite-dimensional module are finitely generated
- Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated
- Stable points of an affine action
- Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties
- homogeneous coordinate ring
- affine cone projective set
- Standard opens of Proj
- Points of Proj of a graded ring
- Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open
- Standard opens are affine
- Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties
- Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules
- Global and local dimension of classical varieties
- The Axiom of Choice
- Invariants separate a stable point from a disjoint closed invariant subset
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. E. Newstead, Geometric Invariant Theory, lecture notes, CIMAT Guanajuato 2006 (CEL/HAL; archived copy) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victoria Hoskins, Moduli Problems and Geometric Invariant Theory, FU Berlin lecture notes (2015/16) (standard reference, not scraped)
- I. Dolgachev, Lectures on Invariant Theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 296, Cambridge University Press, 2003 (standard reference, not scraped)