Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective GIT quotient for a linear action

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the affine invariant-theory and quotient suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group, V a finite-dimensional rational G-module, X⊆P(V) a G-stable closed projective algebraic set, R=R(X) its homogeneous coordinate ring (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and L=O(1)∣X. Put Xss=X∖V+(R+G)={x∈X:∃f∈R>0G, f(x)≠0} and Xs={x∈Xss:Gx is closed in Xss and Gx is finite} (Semistable and stable points for a linearization). Then:

(i) RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with (RG)0=C when X≠∅ (and RG=0 when X=∅), and Y:=Proj⁡RG is a projective C-scheme of finite type;

(ii) Xss and Xs are open G-stable subsets of X, and Xss is the union of the affine G-stable charts Xf for f∈R>0G;

(iii) the chart morphisms of Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action glue to a G-invariant morphism π:Xss→Y that is a good quotient in the sense of Good and geometric quotients for group actions; π is surjective, OY≅(π∗OXss)G, and for x1,x2∈Xss one has π(x1)=π(x2) if and only if Gx1‾∩Gx2‾∩Xss≠∅;

(iv) Ys:=π(Xs) is open in Y, Xs=π−1(Ys), and π:Xs→Ys is a geometric quotient; a point x∈Xss is stable if and only if Gx is finite and Gx is closed in Xss, equivalently if and only if Gx is finite and x lies in a chart Xf, f∈R>0G, in which all G-orbits are closed; and if Xs=Xss then π is a geometric quotient of Xss.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a finite-dimensional rational G-module V, a G-stable closed projective algebraic set X⊆P(V) with homogeneous coordinate ring R and invariant part RG, and L=O(1)∣X.

[F1]

Finite generation of invariants. For X≠∅, R is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with R0=C and finite-dimensional graded pieces, and the action of G is rational by graded algebra automorphisms; hence RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with (RG)0=C. (Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated, homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set)

[F2]

Projectivity of the Proj. A finitely generated graded C-algebra A with A0=C and finite-dimensional graded pieces has Proj⁡A a projective C-scheme of finite type; in particular Y=Proj⁡RG is projective of finite type. (Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective)

[F3]

The affine chart quotients. For every homogeneous f∈RG of positive degree the chart Xf is affine and G-stable with O(Xf)G=(RG)(f), and the affine quotient morphism πf:Xf→D+(f)=Spec⁡(RG)(f) is a good quotient; the various πf agree on overlaps. (Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action, Nonvanishing charts of sections of an ample linearization are affine)

[F4]

Locality and the affine picture. Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical; a good quotient is geometric exactly when its fibres are the orbits. Every fibre of the affine categorical quotient of an affine G-variety contains a unique closed orbit, for an affine G-variety the stable locus (closed orbit and finite stabilizer) is characterized by the affine stable-locus theorem, with geometric quotient onto its image, and a closed subgroup of the finite-type group G is finite exactly when its dimension is zero. (Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients, The stable locus has a geometric quotient, Stable points of an affine action, Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient)

[F5]

Orbit and stabilizer behaviour. The function x↦dim⁡Gx is upper semicontinuous and x↦dim⁡Gx is lower semicontinuous; for every point one has dim⁡G=dim⁡Gx+dim⁡Gx, the orbit closure Gx‾ is the union of Gx and of orbits of strictly smaller dimension, every orbit closure contains a closed orbit, and every orbit of minimal dimension in a G-stable closed set is closed. (Semicontinuity of stabilizer and orbit dimension, Orbit dimension and closed orbits for complex group actions, Global and local dimension of classical varieties)

[F6]

Good-quotient clauses. A good quotient π:X→Y is G-invariant and surjective, satisfies OY≅(π∗OX)G, maps closed G-stable subsets to closed subsets and disjoint closed G-stable subsets to disjoint subsets, and is categorical; a geometric quotient has the G-orbits as its fibres, with the quotient topology and sheaf conditions. (Good and geometric quotients for group actions, Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties)

[F7]

Separate a point from a disjoint invariant closed subset. For an affine reductive-group action with categorical quotient π, if Z is closed and invariant and π(x)∉π(Z), there is an invariant regular function h with h(x)≠0 and h∣Z=0 (Invariants separate a stable point from a disjoint closed invariant subset).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

The invariant ring and the target. If X=∅, its homogeneous coordinate ring is zero, the invariant ring and every localized chart ring are zero, both loci and every quotient target are empty, and all conclusions hold with the empty morphisms. Assume henceforth X≠∅. By [F1] RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with (RG)0=C and finite-dimensional graded pieces; by [F2] the scheme Y=Proj⁡RG is projective of finite type over C. This is assertion (i).

1.2F3given

The semistable locus. By definition x∈Xss exactly when f(x)≠0 for some homogeneous invariant f of positive degree, i.e. exactly when x lies in one of the charts Xf with f∈R>0G; each such chart is open, affine and G-stable by [F3], so Xss is open and G-stable and covered by the charts Xf.

2.1F3F4F6step 1.2

Gluing the chart morphisms. The chart morphisms πf:Xf→D+(f) of [F3] agree on overlaps Xfg by the compatibility assertion of [F3]; since the D+(f) with f∈R>0G cover Y and the Xf cover Xss, they glue to a G-invariant morphism π:Xss→Y whose restrictions are the good quotients πf. For any positive-degree invariants f,g, the function fdeg⁡g/gdeg⁡f on Xg is the pullback of the same fraction on D+(g); it is nonzero precisely on Xf∩Xg and on D+(f)∩D+(g), respectively. Thus π−1(D+(f))=Xf, since the Xg cover Xss, so the chart maps really are target restrictions of π. By [F4] the good-quotient property is local on the target, so π is a good quotient; in particular by [F6] it is surjective, its pullback identifies OY with (π∗OXss)G, and images of closed G-stable (respectively disjoint closed G-stable) subsets are closed (respectively disjoint).

2.2givenstep 1.2

Closed charts and invariant vanishing. Call a chart Xf, f∈R>0G, closed if every G-orbit contained in Xf is closed in Xf, and let Xc be the union of the closed charts; this is an open G-stable subset of Xss. If Xf is closed and g∈R>0G, then Xfg=Xf∩Xg is an open G-stable subset of Xf, so every orbit contained in Xfg is closed in Xfg as well. For a homogeneous invariant section F, if F(x)=0 then its closed zero locus is G-stable and contains Gx, hence also contains every z∈Gx‾∩Xss. Equivalently, if such a z lies in a chart Xf and F=f, then F(x)≠0, so x∈Xf.

2.3F3F4F5F7step 1.2

The stable locus lies in the closed charts. Let x∈Xs and choose f0∈R>0G with x∈Xf0 (step 1.2). The set Z={y∈Xf0:dim⁡Gy>0} is closed and G-stable in Xf0 by [F5] and is disjoint from the closed orbit Gx, whose stabilizers are conjugate to the finite group Gx. Since Gx and Z are disjoint closed G-stable subsets of the affine chart, the good-quotient property [F4] gives πf0(Gx)∩πf0(Z)=∅. Thus πf0(x)∉πf0(Z), and the affine quotient separation lemma [F7] gives h∈O(Xf0)G with h(x)≠0 and h∣Z=0. By [F3] write h=g/f0m with g∈RG homogeneous. Choose N≥1 and put F=gf0N; then F is homogeneous invariant of positive degree and F(x)≠0. Its chart satisfies XF⊆Xf0, and if y∈XF then h(y)=g(y)/f0(y)m≠0, so y∉Z; hence every point of XF has finite stabilizer. If an orbit Gy⊆XF were not closed in XF, its boundary in XF would contain a point z∈XF∩Gy‾∖Gy; by [F5] the orbit Gz has dimension strictly smaller than dim⁡Gy. But every point of XF has finite stabilizer, so every orbit in XF has dimension dim⁡G by the orbit-stabilizer formula [F5], a contradiction. Thus XF is a closed chart containing x. Every stable point lies in such a chart, so Xs⊆Xc.

3.1F5step 2.1step 2.3

Points of closed charts with finite stabilizer are stable. Let x∈Xc with Gx finite and choose a closed chart Xf containing x. The fibre π−1(π(x)) is closed in Xss and contains Gx, so it contains Gx‾∩Xss. Since π(x)∈D+(f) and Xf=π−1(D+(f)) by step 2.1, the fibre lies in Xf. Thus every z∈Gx‾∩Xss lies in the closure of Gx computed in Xf, and closedness of the orbit in that chart forces z∈Gx. Hence Gx is closed in Xss and x∈Xs. With step 2.3 this gives Xs=Xc∩{x∈X:dim⁡Gx=0}.

3.2F4step 2.1step 2.2

Fibres of π. Let x1,x2∈Xss. If π(x1)=π(x2), choose f∈R>0G with π(x1)∈D+(f); then x1,x2∈Xf and, since πf restricts π by step 2.1, πf(x1)=πf(x2), so the closures of Gx1 and Gx2 in Xf meet by the unique-closed-orbit property of the affine fibre ([F4]), hence their closures in Xss meet. Conversely let z∈Gx1‾∩Gx2‾∩Xss and choose f∈R>0G with z∈Xf; by the vanishing observation of step 2.2 the points x1,x2 also lie in Xf, and z lies in both closures computed in Xf, so πf(x1)=πf(z)=πf(x2) by continuity and π(x1)=π(x2). This proves (iii).

4.1F3F4F5F6step 2.3step 3.1

Openness and the geometric quotient. By step 3.1 the stable locus is Xs=Xc∩{x∈X:dim⁡Gx=0}. The union Xc of charts is open and G-stable, and {x:dim⁡Gx=0} is open in Xc by upper semicontinuity of x↦dim⁡Gx ([F5]); hence Xs is open in X, and it is G-stable because stabilizers of points in one orbit are conjugate. On a closed chart Xf the affine quotient πf of [F3] is a good quotient whose fibres contain a unique closed orbit ([F4]); since every orbit in Xf is closed, each fibre is a single orbit, so πf is a geometric quotient. These geometric quotients agree on overlaps by [F3], so by locality of the geometric-quotient property ([F4]) they glue to a geometric quotient πc:Xc→Yc:=π(Xc), where Yc is the union of the open sets D+(f) over the closed charts, hence open in Y. The closed G-stable subset Xc∖Xs is mapped by the quotient πc to a closed subset of Yc by clause (iv) of [F6], so Ys:=π(Xs)=Yc∖π(Xc∖Xs) is open in Yc and hence in Y; and Xs=π−1(Ys) because the fibres of πc are the orbits and Xs is G-stable. The restriction of the geometric quotient πc to the open G-stable subset Xs is again a geometric quotient onto Ys by locality, so π:Xs→Ys is a geometric quotient. This proves (iv); if Xs=Xss then Xc=Xss and the same argument shows that π is a geometric quotient of Xss.

5.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1∎

Assertions (i)-(iv) are established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii) in step 1.2, (iii) in steps 2.1 and 3.2, and (iv) in steps 2.3, 3.1 and 4.1.

Remarks

  • No Hilbert--Mumford criterion. Semistability and stability are read off from invariant sections and orbit closures only; no numerical criterion is stated or used.
  • The linearization is a hypothesis. The action on R and hence the quotient come from the linearized structure of O(1)∣X; no item constructs a linearization of an arbitrary ample sheaf.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources