Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory, Proj and ample-sheaf suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety X (projective variety classical), and let L be an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). Let R(X,L)=⨁n≥0Γ(X,L⊗n) and let R(X,L)G be its graded invariant subalgebra. Then:

(i) R(X,L)G is a finitely generated graded C-algebra and the GIT quotient Y=X/ ⁣/LG=Proj⁡R(X,L)G is a projective C-scheme of finite type;

(ii) the semistable locus Xss(L) (Semistable and stable points for a linearization) is the union of the affine G-stable charts Xσ over σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n)G, n≥1, and is open in X; for every m≥1 one has Xss(L)=Xss(L⊗m) and Xs(L)=Xs(L⊗m), and the Veronese isomorphism Proj⁡R(X,L)G≅Proj⁡R(X,L⊗m)G identifies the two quotient data;

(iii) the chart morphisms glue to a G-invariant morphism π:Xss(L)→Y that is a good quotient in the sense of Good and geometric quotients for group actions; in particular OY≅(π∗OXss(L))G, π is surjective, closed G-stable subsets have closed images, and disjoint closed G-stable subsets have disjoint images;

(iv) if m≥1 and i:X↪P(V) is a G-equivariant closed immersion with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves (An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power), then Xss(L)=X∩P(V)ss and Xs(L)=X∩P(V)s for the linear action, so the definitions of Semistable and stable points for a linearization agree with the embedded ones;

(v) no linearization of an arbitrary ample invertible sheaf is constructed or assumed possible, and no Hilbert--Mumford criterion is used or claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a complex projective variety X with an algebraic action, an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf L, its section ring R=R(X,L) and invariant part RG, and an equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves when one is chosen.

[F1]

Finite generation. The section ring R(X,L) is a finitely generated graded C-algebra, its invariant subalgebra RG is finitely generated, and Proj⁡RG is projective of finite type over C (The section ring of an ample invertible sheaf is finitely generated, Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated, Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective).

[F2]

Equivariant very ample power. Some positive power of L gives a G-equivariant closed immersion into a projective space of a finite-dimensional rational G-module, via its complete linear system (An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power).

[F3]

Linear-action GIT theorem. For a G-stable closed X′⊆P(V), the linear-action theorem gives its semistable/stable loci, the good quotient from the invariant coordinate ring, the orbit-closure description of quotient fibres, and the geometric quotient on the stable locus (Projective GIT quotient for a linear action).

[F4]

Coordinate charts. For a homogeneous coordinate ring A of a projective embedding and a homogeneous section f∈A+, the chart Xf is affine with coordinate ring A(f); the chart construction is compatible with localization (homogeneous coordinate ring, Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action).

[F5]

Finite section modules over the coordinate ring. Put S=C[V]=Sym⁡(V∗), let A be the image of S in the section ring of L⊗m, and for 0≤j<m put Mj=⨁k≥0Γ(X,L⊗(mk+j)). The graded section-module theorem gives a finitely generated tail of each Mj over S; the finitely many initial graded pieces are finite-dimensional by projective coherent cohomology, so each full Mj is finite over S. The kernel of S→A acts by zero on every Mj, so R(X,L)=⨁j=0m−1Mj is a finite A-module (High-degree section module is finite graded, Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field). For b∈R, the module R is faithful over A[b] because an element annihilating it annihilates 1; Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element therefore makes b integral over A.

[F6]

Extension from a section chart. If f is a positive-degree section and h∈Γ(Xf,OX), then after multiplying by a power of f the function extends to a global section of the corresponding power of L; hence Γ(Xf,OX)=R(X,L)(f) (Extend a quasi-coherent section after multiplying by a power).

[F7]

Reynolds operator and localization. For a rational G-algebra, the Reynolds operator is natural under equivariant maps, is linear over invariant elements, preserves a G-stable grading, and invariants commute with localization at a homogeneous invariant (The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring, Invariants of a localization at an invariant element).

[F8]

Good quotients. Good quotients are local on the target; the affine chart quotients in [F4] glue to the section-ring quotient, and the good quotient clauses include the invariant structure sheaf and closed/disjoint image properties (Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients, Good and geometric quotients for group actions).

[F9]

Proj and Veronese. Standard homogeneous opens cover Proj; for a graded ring, passing to a positive Veronese gives a canonical Proj isomorphism with matching localized degree-zero rings (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

Finite generation and projectivity. By F1 the invariant section ring RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with degree-zero part C, so Y=Proj⁡RG is projective of finite type. This proves (i).

1.2F2given

Choose an embedded model. Fix any equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves, whose existence is F2. Let X′=i(X), S=C[V]=Sym⁡(V∗), and let A⊆R(X,L⊗m) be the homogeneous coordinate ring, the image of the restriction map S→R(X,L⊗m).

1.3F5algebra

The full section ring is finite over A. For 0≤j<m, the graded module Mj=⨁k≥0Γ(X,L⊗(mk+j)) is the section module of the coherent sheaf i∗L⊗j on P(V), so it is finite over S by F5. If a homogeneous polynomial in S restricts to zero on X, then it acts by zero on each Mj, since multiplication by it is restriction followed by multiplication of sections. Thus the S-actions on the Mj factor through A, each Mj is a finite A-module, and R=⨁j=0m−1Mj is a finite A-module. By the faithful-module criterion in F5 every homogeneous σ∈R is integral over A.

2.1F3F7step 1.3

Invariant sections give invariant coordinate charts. Let σ∈RnG be homogeneous of positive degree. Since it is integral over A, it satisfies a monic relation over A; taking the homogeneous component of total degree rn gives a relation σr+∑i=1raiσr−i=0 with ai∈A∩Rin (zero when m∤in). Apply the Reynolds operator of R to this relation. Its naturality under multiplication by the invariant σ and under the inclusion A↪R gives σr+∑i=1rRA(ai)σr−i=0, where RA(ai)∈AG∩Rin by F7. If σ(x)≠0 at x∈X, not all RA(ai) can vanish at x, since evaluating the displayed relation in the one-dimensional fiber of L⊗rn would otherwise give σ(x)r=0. Hence every point semistable for the full section ring lies in a nonvanishing chart of a positive-degree invariant in AG. The reverse inclusion is immediate from AG⊆RG, so the embedded semistable locus X′ss equals Xss(L). The same monic relation shows that the charts D+(f) with f∈A+G cover Proj⁡RG: for any homogeneous prime avoiding R+G, choose σ∈R+G outside it; some coefficient RA(ai) in its relation must also be outside the prime.

3.1F4F6F7step 2.1

Identify the two quotient targets chartwise. For f∈A+G, the affine chart Xf has ring A(f) by F4. Fractions in R(f) are regular on Xf, and F6 shows that every regular function there is such a fraction, so A(f)=Γ(Xf,OX)=R(f) as G-algebras. Taking invariants and using F7 gives (AG)(f)=(RG)(f). The D+(f) for f∈A+G cover both Proj⁡AG and Y=Proj⁡RG by step 2.1; these identical chart rings and their localization maps therefore glue to a canonical isomorphism θ:Proj⁡AG→∼Y. On every chart the quotient morphisms from Xf are induced by the same inclusion of invariant regular functions into Γ(Xf,OX), so θ identifies the linear-action quotient with the section-ring quotient.

3.2F3F7F9step 2.1

Compare positive tensor powers and embedded data. For r≥1, the r-th Veronese of RG is R(X,L⊗r)G, so F9 identifies the Proj quotient data for L and L⊗r. The nonvanishing locus of a section equals that of every positive tensor power, so the semistable loci coincide; closedness of orbits in that same locus and finiteness of stabilizers then give equality of the stable loci. For the fixed compatible embedding in step 1.2, step 2.1 proves that the definitions on X′=i(X) agree with those from the full section ring. Moreover the equivariant surjection S→A induces a surjection SG→AG by F7; hence invariant forms on X′ lift to invariant forms on P(V), giving X′ss=X′∩P(V)ss. The orbit closure of a point of X′ in the ambient semistable locus stays in X′, because X′ is closed and invariant; closedness there is therefore equivalent to closedness in X′ss, and stabilizers agree. Thus X′s=X′∩P(V)s. This proves (iv) and all Veronese claims.

4.1F3F8step 2.1step 3.1

Transport GIT properties. The linear-action theorem F3 applies to X′⊆P(V). By steps 2.1 and 3.1 its semistable set, quotient target, and quotient morphism identify with Xss(L), Y, and π respectively. Thus the section-ring morphism is a good quotient with the orbit-closure description of its fibres, proving (iii); the linear theorem also gives openness and G-stability of both loci, the stable geometric quotient, and the invariant-chart criterion. Since stability is defined by finite stabilizer and closed orbit inside the same identified semistable set, its locus agrees with X′s, proving (ii) and the stable-locus assertions in (iv). All these constructions use the given linearization and the cited orbit/quotient results; they construct no linearization and use no Hilbert--Mumford criterion, proving (v).

5.1F1F2F3F7F8F9step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2∎

Assertions (i)-(v) are established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii)-(iv) in steps 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2, and (v) in step 4.1. The proof uses only the given linearization and the orbit/quotient suppliers; it constructs no linearization and invokes no numerical criterion.

Remarks

  • The repair of the Veronese step. The projectivity of Y uses Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective in its corrected form, for the particular common multiple d=kL supplied there; the equality of the loci under every positive power m is proved separately and does not use generation in degree one of an arbitrary Veronese.
  • No linearization existence. The result assumes the linearization of L.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

149 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources