How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety
Definition
Let be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a classical complex variety (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules, Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties), and let be an invertible sheaf on with total space (Invertible sheaves), the total space being obtained by gluing over local frames of using their invertible regular transition functions, and the projection being a morphism of locally ringed spaces (Morphisms of locally ringed spaces). Write for the action.
A -linearization of is an algebraic -action on the total space such that
- for all , , and
- for every and the fibre map , , is -linear.
A -linearized invertible sheaf is an invertible sheaf together with a linearization; the pair is written . Equivalently, a linearization is an isomorphism of sheaves on satisfying the cocycle identity
where is the multiplication; at both sides map the fibre to . The isomorphism sends a vector over to its translate by over , so its inverse recovers the action on total spaces.
For any algebraic character the twist multiplies the fibre action by and is again a linearization of the same invertible sheaf. In particular linearizations are not unique, the trivial action admits the trivial linearization of and its twists, and for a finite-dimensional rational -module the induced action on the tautological line bundle linearizes , and its dual linearizes .
The two main theorems of this page always assume that a linearization is given; no general existence of linearizations is claimed here.
Depends on
Used by
- The semistable locus depends on the linearization, not only on the sheaf Counterexample
- Semistable and stable points for a linearization Definition
- The invariant section ring and the projective GIT quotient Definition
- GIT quotients of the projective line for different linearizations Example
- An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power Lemma
- Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring Lemma
- The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. E. Newstead, Geometric Invariant Theory, lecture notes, CIMAT Guanajuato 2006 (CEL/HAL; archived copy) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victoria Hoskins, Moduli Problems and Geometric Invariant Theory, FU Berlin lecture notes (2015/16) (standard reference, not scraped)
- I. Dolgachev, Lectures on Invariant Theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 296, Cambridge University Press, 2003 (standard reference, not scraped)