How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective GIT from Linearized Line Bundles
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilizers, and Controlled Quotients
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Classical Complex Algebraic Actions and Affine Embeddings
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Compact Lie Groups, Maximal Tori, and Peter–Weyl Theory
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Complete Reducibility for Compact Groups
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Averaging and Character-Theory Prerequisites
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Group Schemes of Finite Type over a Field
- Haar Measure Existence and Uniqueness
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Holomorphic Functions of Several Complex Variables
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Lie Algebra Representations, Enveloping Algebras, and PBW
- Lie Groups, Invariant Fields, and the Exponential Map
- Lie Subgroups, Actions, and Homogeneous Spaces
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morphisms Local Rings and Rational Maps of Affine Varieties
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Nonaffine Algebraic Groups, Barsotti-Chevalley, and Abelian Varieties
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normal Varieties, Normalization, and Zariski's Main Theorem
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Reductive Affine Invariant Theory and Geometric Quotients
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Semisimple Lie Algebras, Cohomology, and Levi Theory
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Smooth-Projective Serre Duality and Flag-Variety Line Bundles
- Solvable and Nilpotent Lie Algebras
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Unitary Representations, Positive Type and GNS
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
This page constructs the projective GIT quotient of a projective variety by a reductive group with respect to an ample linearized invertible sheaf, and it proves which quotient properties hold on the semistable and on the stable locus. The construction is the classical one: take the graded ring of invariant sections of all positive tensor powers of the linearized sheaf and form its Proj. The linearization is part of the data, not a consequence of it, so every theorem assumes a linearized sheaf outright. The construction begins with this specified equivariant structure on the ample sheaf.
The first definitions fix the vocabulary. A -linearization of an invertible sheaf is an action on the total space covering the action on whose fibre maps are linear; equivalently it is a cocycle isomorphism on . Tensor powers inherit linearizations, their section spaces are rational -modules, and the direct sum of these spaces is a graded rational -algebra, the section ring . Twisting a linearization by a character changes the induced action on sections and hence the invariant rings, so the linearization genuinely matters.
The quotient is then built chart by chart. For a homogeneous invariant section the nonvanishing locus is an affine -stable open subset, and the invariant functions on it are the degree-zero part of the localized invariant ring. The resulting affine quotients are good quotients and agree on overlaps, so they glue to a good quotient from the semistable locus onto ; the fibre description is the expected one, in terms of closures of orbits meeting inside the semistable locus. The tools are proved on this page: finite generation of the invariant ring in the linear case and of the full section ring in the ample case, affineness of the invariant charts, the affine localization computation for invariants, and projectivity of the Proj, which rests on a corrected Veronese generation lemma for finitely generated graded algebras.
On the stable locus the quotient becomes an orbit space. A point is stable when its orbit is closed in the semistable locus and its stabilizer is finite, and equivalently when it has finite stabilizer and lies in an invariant section chart on which every orbit is closed; the stable locus is open, its image in the quotient is open, and the restriction of the quotient to it is a geometric quotient. The ample case is reduced to the linear one by an equivariant embedding after a positive tensor power, using the same reduction that turns invariant sections of powers of into invariant homogeneous forms on projective space.
No Hilbert--Mumford criterion is stated or used anywhere on the page: semistability and stability are read off from invariant sections and orbit closures alone. The companion page shows in two computations that the (semi)stable loci and the quotient depend on the chosen linearization and not only on the isomorphism class of the underlying ample sheaf.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety
Definition
Let be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a classical complex variety (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules, Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties), and let be an invertible sheaf on with total space (Invertible sheaves), the total space being obtained by gluing over local frames of using their invertible regular transition functions, and the projection being a morphism of locally ringed spaces (Morphisms of locally ringed spaces). Write for the action.
A -linearization of is an algebraic -action on the total space such that
- for all , , and
- for every and the fibre map , , is -linear.
A -linearized invertible sheaf is an invertible sheaf together with a linearization; the pair is written . Equivalently, a linearization is an isomorphism of sheaves on satisfying the cocycle identity
where is the multiplication; at both sides map the fibre to . The isomorphism sends a vector over to its translate by over , so its inverse recovers the action on total spaces.
For any algebraic character the twist multiplies the fibre action by and is again a linearization of the same invertible sheaf. In particular linearizations are not unique, the trivial action admits the trivial linearization of and its twists, and for a finite-dimensional rational -module the induced action on the tautological line bundle linearizes , and its dual linearizes .
The two main theorems of this page always assume that a linearization is given; no general existence of linearizations is claimed here.
Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the Proj construction. Let be a finitely generated graded commutative -algebra with and every finite-dimensional, and suppose is generated as a -algebra by homogeneous elements of positive degrees ; put (with when ) and with .
Then the Veronese subalgebra is generated in degree one by : every element of is a polynomial in elements of the finite-dimensional space . Consequently, if , choosing a -basis of and the induced graded surjection , , the canonical isomorphism exhibits as a closed subscheme of the projective space of finite type over , and pulls back to .
If , then ; and if , degree-one generation makes . In either case is the closed subscheme of , so the conclusion holds vacuously in that case as well.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice as inherited from the Proj construction; a finitely generated graded -algebra with and for all ; homogeneous generators of positive degrees when ; the numbers , and .
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it is inherited by this item from the Proj construction, whose localization and chart-gluing data use it. (The Axiom of Choice, Projective scheme of a homogeneous quotient and its standard affine charts)
Finite homogeneous generation. is generated as a -algebra by finitely many homogeneous elements, and every is finite-dimensional. If then the degree-zero part of a generating set may be omitted, so that is generated by finitely many homogeneous elements of positive degrees; every element of is then a -linear combination of monomials with . (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)
Proj dictionary. For a graded ring with , the points of are the homogeneous primes not containing , the standard opens are for homogeneous of positive degree, and these charts cover . For the standard graded polynomial ring one has . (Projective scheme of a homogeneous quotient and its standard affine charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring)
Closed subschemes of projective space. For a homogeneous ideal the canonical closed immersion identifies with ; its chart rings are the quotients . (Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals)
Veronese invariance. There is a canonical isomorphism mapping to with the same coordinate ring , under which corresponds to . (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading)
Twisting sheaves. For a graded ring with , the sheaf is the associated sheaf of the shifted graded module , with sections on the chart ; a degree-zero homomorphism of graded -modules induces a morphism of associated sheaves, computed on charts by the corresponding localization maps. (Twisting sheaf on Proj, Associated sheaf of a graded module on Proj)
Proof
If then for all and hence ; since every homogeneous prime contains , the set is empty, and is the closed subscheme , so the assertions about hold vacuously. Assume henceforth and fix homogeneous generators of of positive degrees , with , and .
The generation claim. We show that every monomial of degree with is a product of monomials of degree . Suppose not, and choose a counterexample with minimal; call it , so that has no decomposition with and . Then has no sub-vector of degree : if had , then would have degree and would, by minimality of , decompose into vectors of degree , so would decompose into of them.
Maximal -blocks. Call an -block of if and , and choose a maximal-length family of -blocks of with ; such a maximum exists because every -block has degree . Then , since otherwise would be a sub-vector of of degree , contradicting step 1.2. Put . The vector contains no -block: any -block would be disjoint from all , contradicting maximality of . Moreover , using and .
The box bound. For each , since is a positive integer and has degree , the absence of an -block in forces , i.e. . Hence , contradicting the lower bound from step 2.1. Therefore every monomial of degree , , is a product of monomials of degree ; since is spanned by such monomials and , the Veronese algebra satisfies with finite-dimensional.
If , step 3.1 gives , so its Proj is empty and is a closed subscheme of as in step 1.1; [F5] gives the same conclusion for . Otherwise choose a basis of the nonzero finite-dimensional space . The graded map sending to is surjective by step 3.1. Its homogeneous kernel identifies with , and [F4] exhibits its Proj as . The remaining chart arguments concern this nonempty-basis case.
The twisting sheaves. On the covering charts of , the degree-zero module is free with frame : every fraction of shifted degree zero is times a degree-zero fraction. Its pullback to is therefore free with the corresponding frame , which likewise generates . On overlaps the transition ratios pull back to . Thus these frame identifications glue to identify the pullback of with by [F6].
Finite type. The charts have rings obtained by quotienting the polynomial ring in the degree-zero ratios , hence are finitely generated -algebras; finitely many charts suffice because is generated over by the finite set by step 3.1, so cover . Thus is a -scheme of finite type.
Finally [F5] gives the canonical isomorphism mapping to . Composed with step 4.1 it exhibits as a closed subscheme of , of finite type over by step 5.2, and by step 5.1 the twisting sheaf pulls back to , as claimed; the degenerate case was settled in step 1.1.
Remarks
- The correcting range of . The repaired statement singles out the common multiple with ; the original scaffold claimed the conclusion for every common multiple of the degrees of a generating set, which is false. With graded by , , , , one has , and the monomial has degree although it is not a product of two monomials of degree : no sub-multiset of the degrees sums to . Hence is not generated in degree one, while the lemma supplies and then is. (This is Deligne's classical phenomenon, quoted in the weighted-projective-space literature; the proof above is self-contained.)
- Multiples of . If is a standard graded -algebra, then so is every Veronese : . Applying this to shows that is generated in degree one for every multiple of , Moreover, the maximal-block and box-bound argument of steps 1.2–3.1 works for every integer : its only bound on is . Thus the conclusion holds for all sufficiently large multiples of .
- No Hilbert--Mumford input. The proof uses only the monomial combinatorics of the degrees and the definitions of and its twisting sheaves; no criterion for (semi)stability is involved.
Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring
Statement
For the projective constant-function conclusions in (ii) and (iii), assume AC inherited from global regular functions projective variety; the remaining conclusions use no choice principle. Let be a -linearized invertible sheaf on a classical complex -variety (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety). Then:
(i) for every the tensor power (with ) carries an induced -linearization, functorial in , and the canonical multiplication isomorphisms are -equivariant;
(ii) each space of global sections carries the linear action , is a rational -module (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules), and restriction to a -stable open subset is -equivariant; the constant functions in are fixed by , and if is projective and irreducible then ;
(iii) the direct sum is a graded commutative -algebra with acting by graded algebra automorphisms, so that is a graded rational -algebra with degree-zero part ; if is projective and irreducible this part is ;
(iv) for global sections and one has , and for a -invariant section and every one has , where .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex affine algebraic group , a classical complex -variety (a quasi-compact prevariety over with an algebraic action), an invertible sheaf on with a -linearization .
Linearization. The action covers the action map , is -linear on fibres, and is equivalently encoded by an isomorphism over whose pullbacks satisfy the cocycle identity; for the assignment is an isomorphism of lines. (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety)
Rational modules. A rational -module is a complex vector space with a linear left action in which every vector lies in a finite-dimensional -stable subspace on which is a morphism of varieties. A map from a variety into a finite-dimensional vector space is a morphism exactly when its compositions with a spanning set of linear functionals are regular. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)
Tensor powers of invertible sheaves. For invertible each is invertible, , and there are canonical multiplication isomorphisms compatible with restriction; these are used to define the graded algebra . (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Quasi-coherent module on a scheme)
Nonvanishing loci. For global sections of invertible sheaves one has , and for an affine open the set is affine; a nonzero section of a line bundle has nonempty nonvanishing locus. (A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme)
Affine products. For affine algebraic sets the coordinate ring of is , so every regular function on a product of affine models is a finite sum of products of regular functions of the factors. (Products of affine algebraic sets have tensor-product coordinate rings)
Quasi-compactness. A classical algebraic prevariety is quasi-compact with a finite affine cover, and affine models form a basis of its topology; hence any open cover can be refined to a finite affine cover, and a section of the structure sheaf that restricts to on such a cover is . (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties)
Projective functions. Under AC, every global regular function on a nonempty irreducible classical projective variety is constant. (global regular functions projective variety, The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Tensor powers. By [F1] the linearization is an isomorphism whose two pullbacks to satisfy the cocycle identity. Taking -th tensor powers and using [F3] gives an isomorphism satisfying the same cocycle identity, and the corresponding fibre maps are -linear isomorphisms of lines; hence carries an induced -linearization , and a -equivariant isomorphism of linearized invertible sheaves induces -equivariant isomorphisms , which is functoriality. The canonical multiplication is the associativity identification of the same tensor power constructed in two ways, so it intertwines with : on a fibre at both sides send to .
The action on sections. For define , an element of . The assignment is the composition of the morphisms , , and , so it is a regular section of over ; in particular is a global section for each . The action is linear in , satisfies , and by the group law of the action on the total space; restricting to a -stable open subset commutes with the formula, so the restriction map is -equivariant.
Finite dimensionality of orbits. Fix and choose, using [F6], a finite affine cover such that is trivial, with trivializations . On the affine product the section corresponds under to a regular function, hence by [F5] to a finite sum with and ; write for the local section corresponding to and , a finite-dimensional subspace. For every the restricted section lies in , so the orbit is contained in the subspace , which is finite-dimensional because restriction is injective by [F6].
Nonvanishing loci. For and the identification with its image is the canonical one, so [F4] gives . For a -invariant and , write for the -fold product inside ; trivializing near a point , the section corresponds to a regular function and to , so is nonzero at exactly when is; hence .
Rationality. Let be the span of the orbit ; it is -stable by step 1.2 and finite-dimensional by step 1.3. The orbit map , , is a morphism: after choosing a frame of the line fibre at , each evaluation is a regular scalar function by step 1.2. These scalar evaluation functionals span : a section annihilated by all of them is zero, since in a local frame its coefficient is a regular function on a reduced classical variety vanishing at every point. Hence for every the map is a morphism, being a linear combination of orbit maps of spanning elements, and choosing a basis of exhibits the action of on through matrices with regular entries; thus is a finite-dimensional rational -module on which acts by an algebraic action, containing . As was arbitrary, is a rational -module. For the formula reads , so constant functions are fixed; if is projective and irreducible, [F7] gives under its stated AC assumption.
Graded algebra. Define the product of homogeneous elements , by obtained from under the canonical isomorphism of [F3], extended bilinearly. This makes a commutative graded -algebra with unit and degree-zero part , because the multiplication maps are the canonical associativity isomorphisms of tensor powers and are -bilinear and compatible with restriction. By step 1.1 the multiplication is -equivariant, so each acts by a graded algebra automorphism, and each graded piece is a rational -module by step 2.1: is a graded rational -algebra. If is projective and irreducible the degree-zero part is by step 2.1.
Finally (i)-(iv) have been established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii) in steps 1.2, 1.3 and 2.1, (iii) in step 3.1, and (iv) in step 1.4. In particular every space of sections of a tensor power of a linearized invertible sheaf is a rational -module and is a graded rational -algebra, as asserted.
Remarks
- Correction at degree zero. The scaffold wrote ; this holds for projective irreducible (as used on this page) but fails for affine , where is the whole coordinate ring. The statement above records the constants and the projective case separately.
- Restriction to projective used downstream. Every consumer of this item on the page works with a projective variety , where also the degree-zero part of the section ring is .
Good and geometric quotients for group actions
Definition
Assume AC inherited from the quotient suppliers. Let be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a classical complex variety (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules) and let be a -scheme (A locally ringed space). For the scheme, affine and sheaf clauses below, denotes its associated reduced finite-type complex scheme, obtained by gluing spectra of its affine coordinate rings; the algebraic action is interpreted on that scheme. Its complex closed points recover the classical variety (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties, Classical k-points give closed points over an algebraically closed field). Closed invariant subsets refer to underlying closed subsets with their reduced induced schemes. A morphism of -schemes, that is, a morphism of locally ringed spaces commuting with the structure morphisms to (Morphisms of locally ringed spaces), is a good quotient of the action if:
(i) is -invariant and surjective;
(ii) is affine, i.e. is an affine scheme for every affine open ;
(iii) for every open the pullback is an isomorphism onto the -invariant functions;
(iv) for every closed -stable the image is closed in ; and
(v) for disjoint closed -stable one has .
It is a geometric quotient if in addition for every , the complex points of its fibre form exactly one -orbit. The fibre condition is stated on complex closed points; it does not identify all scheme points with classical points.
The good-quotient clauses and the single-orbit fibre condition are separate requirements. The projective GIT theorems below establish the good quotient on the semistable locus and guarantee a geometric quotient on the stable locus. A geometric quotient can also occur outside the stable locus, since the single-orbit fibre condition does not require finite stabilizers.
Remarks
- Relation to the categorical-quotient definition. A good quotient has the categorical universal property for invariant morphisms to classical varieties viewed as their associated schemes; when the target is a classical variety, this is the notion of Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties. On complex closed points it gives a geometric quotient there exactly when its fibres are the -orbits; both implications are proved in Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients below. For affine , Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient supplies the classical closed-point quotient properties. The proof of Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action additionally verifies the scheme surjectivity, affine and invariant-sheaf clauses, giving good quotients of the affine charts.
- Provenance of the notion. This is Seshadri's notion as presented by Newstead in §1.4 and used by Brion (in the form ) and by Hoskins in §§3.3-3.4.
- AC. The definition itself uses no choice; the axiom is inherited only through the quotient suppliers that the later theorems invoke, and every theorem that uses such a supplier carries AC explicitly.
The invariant section ring and the projective GIT quotient
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the Proj construction. Let be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety , let be an ample -linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens), and let be its graded section ring (Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring). Write for the graded subalgebra of -invariant sections.
The projective GIT quotient of by with respect to is the -scheme (Points of Proj of a graded ring, Proj carries a scheme structure), the Proj of the graded invariant subalgebra.
For a homogeneous invariant section with write for the standard open chart of , and for the nonvanishing locus of .
The construction is recorded together with the given linearization and the ample sheaf ; replacing by a positive tensor power does not change the Proj (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading).
Remarks
- Ampleness. The definition uses the ampleness of only to know that the section ring has sufficiently many sections for the construction to be the GIT quotient; the Proj itself is defined for any graded algebra, and, when is reductive, the quotient properties of are proved in Projective GIT quotient for a linear action and The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring.
- Finite generation is not asserted here. The definition does not claim that is finitely generated, nor that is of finite type; For reductive , both are proved in the two theorems just named, the first in the linear case and the second in the ample case.
- Dependence on the linearization. The quotient genuinely depends on the chosen linearization of and not only on the isomorphism class of ; this is recorded in G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety and demonstrated on the companion page by The semistable locus depends on the linearization, not only on the sheaf ↗ and GIT quotients of the projective line for different linearizations ↗.
- Veronese invariance. Replacing by replaces by its -th Veronese subalgebra and leaves unchanged (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading).
An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power
Statement
Assume AC as inherited from the projective and ample-sheaf suppliers. Let be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety (projective variety classical), and let be an ample -linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). Then there exist , a finite-dimensional rational -module , and a -equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves. Moreover can be taken to be the morphism defined by the complete linear system .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety , an ample -linearized invertible sheaf on , and the resulting rational -modules .
Sections of tensor powers. Each is a rational -module for the action induced by the linearization, restriction to -stable opens is equivariant, and the multiplication maps of the section ring are -equivariant. (Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring)
Very ample positive powers. Applied to the proper finite-type morphism over the Noetherian base and to the ample sheaf , the very-ampleness theorem supplies and a finite family of global sections of generating whose associated -morphism is a closed immersion with pulling back to . Projectivity gives properness of over by Projective morphisms are proper, which also gives properness, hence separatedness, of projective space. (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens)
Sections define morphisms. Global sections generating an invertible sheaf define a morphism with , and ; the assignment is a natural bijection between such morphisms and isomorphism classes of globally generated pairs . (Generating line-bundle sections define a morphism to projective space, Maps to projective space equal generating line-bundle data, Global generation by the evaluation map)
Rational modules and duality. The dual of a finite-dimensional rational -module is again a rational -module for the contragredient action, and a morphism into a projective space is -equivariant for the action induced by a linear -action on exactly when the corresponding sections are acted on compatibly. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)
Global sections of a coherent sheaf on a proper field-scheme are finite-dimensional, and a morphism from a proper field-scheme to a separated field-scheme is proper. (Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field, Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper)
Proof
By [F2] applied to there are and global sections of generating whose associated morphism is a closed immersion with pulling back to ; in particular is globally generated and .
Put , finite-dimensional by projective cohomology finiteness, and . The complete-system morphism exists by global generation [F3], with . Let be the span of the generating sections used for the closed immersion of step 1.1, discard linear relations, and extend a basis of to a basis of . Projection to the -coordinates is defined on the open where those coordinates do not all vanish, and . On each standard chart for a generating section in , the map from the affine chart coordinate ring to the corresponding open of is surjective already using ratios from , since the subsystem map is a closed immersion. Adding the other ratios preserves surjectivity, so is a closed immersion into . Finally is projective, hence proper, and is separated, so is proper; its image is closed in . Its closed immersion into therefore is a closed immersion into as well.
Equivariance. By [F1] the space is a rational -module, so its dual carries the contragredient rational structure by [F4]. The evaluation map is -equivariant: for a section , a point and one has , because by the definition of the action. Hence the morphism defined by the complete linear system intertwines the actions and is -equivariant for the induced action on . The evaluation quotient also identifies with equivariantly: the fibre of the tautological line at is the evaluation line in , and dualizing its equivariant inclusion gives exactly the equivariant evaluation quotient . With step 2.1 this gives the required -equivariant closed immersion with .
The integer , the finite-dimensional rational module and the -equivariant closed immersion defined by the complete linear system have been produced in steps 2.1 and 3.1, and holds by step 2.1.
Remarks
- No claim for itself. The lemma embeds only after passing to the positive power ; no item of this pair asserts that itself is very ample or linearizes an embedding, in accordance with the design's warning that no linearization-existence or very-ampleness statement for an arbitrary ample bundle be made.
- Register. The properness and ampleness clauses are those of the scheme-theoretic suppliers; the classical projective variety is used through the identification of its closed-point model with the underlying scheme, as elsewhere on this page.
Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the quotient suppliers. Let act on a classical complex variety , viewed through its associated reduced finite-type complex scheme for scheme clauses, and let be a -invariant morphism to a -scheme (Good and geometric quotients for group actions).
(i) If is an open cover such that each restriction is a good quotient of the action of on , then is a good quotient; the analogous statement holds for the geometric-quotient property.
(ii) A good quotient has the categorical universal factorization property for invariant morphisms to classical varieties viewed as their associated schemes. It is a geometric quotient if and only if its fibres on complex closed points are exactly the -orbits.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a classical complex variety , a -invariant morphism of locally ringed spaces to a -scheme , and an open cover whose restrictions are good quotients.
Good and geometric quotients. A good quotient is a -invariant surjective affine morphism such that is an isomorphism for all open , images of closed -stable subsets are closed, and images of disjoint closed -stable subsets are disjoint (clauses (i)-(v)); it is geometric if in addition its complex-point fibres are exactly the orbits. A categorical quotient is a -invariant morphism through which every -invariant morphism to a classical variety factors uniquely. (Good and geometric quotients for group actions, Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties)
Classical conventions. Regular functions on a classical variety form a sheaf; a morphism is determined by its local coordinate expressions on affine charts, and two morphisms agreeing on an open cover agree. Invariants of a sheaf of algebras form a sheaf, and surjectivity and invariance are local on the target. Affineness is local on the target by Affineness is local on the target, under AC. (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties, Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules, A locally ringed space)
AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the quotient, closed-point-density and maximal-ideal suppliers; in the common-field argument below it supplies a prime of a nonzero tensor product. (The Axiom of Choice)
Scheme points and equalizers. In finite-type complex affine schemes closed points are complex points and are dense in every closed subset, including nonreduced schemes; the equalizer of two morphisms into a separated scheme is closed. Affine fibre products have tensor-product coordinate rings. Every nonzero ring has a prime ideal under AC. (In a finite-type algebra over a field, closed points are dense in every closed subset of the spectrum, Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal, Equalizers into separated schemes are closed, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)
Proof
Clauses (i)-(v) are local on the target. Assume every restriction is a good quotient. Then is -invariant because the cover and invariance is a local condition on the target, and is surjective because each is. Affineness follows from Affineness is local on the target: refine the by affine opens; their preimages are affine since each is affine. For clause (iii), each restriction is an isomorphism, and for arbitrary open the maps over agree on overlaps because they are determined by restriction of regular functions; since both and the invariant-function presheaf are sheaves, the map is an isomorphism. For clause (iv), if is closed and -stable, then is closed in because is closed and -stable there; a subset of whose traces on all are closed is closed. Clause (v) is checked the same way: . Hence is a good quotient.
Constancy on complex-point fibres. Let be invariant, with the associated separated scheme of a classical variety. If complex points have the same image under but distinct images under , the disjoint closed invariant subsets have intersecting images under , contradicting clause (v). Thus is constant on complex-point fibres. A complex point maps to a closed point of any complex scheme: in each affine open its map to is surjective with maximal kernel.
The geometric property is local. Suppose each restriction is a geometric quotient. A good quotient has orbit fibres exactly when every restriction has orbit fibres, since the fibres of over are the fibres of ; by step 1.1 and [F1] this is exactly the geometric-quotient property. Conversely if is a good quotient with orbit fibres then each restriction is one.
Constancy on all topological fibres. Since is quasi-compact and is surjective, is quasi-compact. Choose a finite affine cover of . Affineness gives , an affine open of finite-type , so is a finite-type complex algebra. Therefore is finite type over : over its ring is a quotient of . The closed equalizer in of contains every complex closed point by step 1.2, hence has underlying set all of by [F4]. For points over , the tensor product is nonzero (tensoring field extensions over a field preserves nonzero injections). A prime of it gives a common field-valued point of dominating , so the equalizer condition on underlying points forces . Thus is constant on every topological fibre.
Open charts and descent. For an affine chart of , put . Constancy on fibres makes saturated. Consequently is open by clause (iv), and . Every coordinate in pulls back to an invariant regular function on , which descends uniquely to by clause (iii); these descended functions respect sums, products and all relations because pullback is an isomorphism. They define a morphism by Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections. On overlaps the underlying maps agree by surjectivity of and the coordinate pullbacks agree by the same sheaf isomorphism, so they glue to with . The same arguments give uniqueness of both its underlying map and sheaf map. This is the categorical universal property.
Geometric criterion and classical topology. The geometric criterion is precisely the complex-point fibre condition in [F1]. For its relation with the classical convention, the induced map is surjective: every fibre over a complex point is nonempty by scheme surjectivity and finite type over by the affine chart description in step 2.2, so [F4] supplies a complex point in it. If has open preimage in and the fibres are orbits, its complementary preimage is a closed invariant classical subset, hence the complex points of a closed reduced subset . Clause (iv) makes closed in , and : a fibre of over a complex point is nonempty precisely when it has a complex point, again by [F4]. Thus is open in the induced classical topology. The converse follows by continuity, and the invariant-function condition is inherited from clause (iii). When is a classical variety through its associated scheme, these are exactly the classical geometric-quotient conditions.
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove locality on the target for the good and geometric properties, step 3.1 proves the categorical universal property of a good quotient, and step 4.1 proves that a good quotient has orbit fibres exactly when it is geometric, which is assertion (ii). The Axiom of Choice is used through the closed-point and maximal-ideal suppliers as recorded in [F3].
Remarks
- No separatedness or properness. Locality on the target and the categorical property use only the clauses of the definition and the sheaf properties of regular functions; no hypothesis of separatedness, properness or finite generation is needed.
- The affine case. For affine and finitely generated invariants, the chart quotients of Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action are good quotients by the affine categorical-quotient theorem Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient, and this locality lemma is what upgrades the chart-wise conclusions to the global semistable locus.
Semistable and stable points for a linearization
Definition
Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group (Reductive and linearly reductive complex algebraic groups) acting algebraically on a complex projective variety (projective variety classical, Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules), and let be an ample -linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety).
A point is semistable with respect to if there exist and with . The set of such points is written , and its complement is the unstable locus.
A point is stable with respect to if its orbit is closed in and its stabilizer is finite. The set of stable points is written .
These definitions agree with the embedded definitions for a -equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves: and , where semistability in is the nonvanishing of a positive-degree invariant homogeneous form (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set) and stability adds closedness of the orbit in the semistable locus and finiteness of the stabilizer; this equivalence is asserted here and proved in the two main theorems of this page.
By construction and are -stable subsets of . The definition itself claims no openness, nonemptiness or finiteness of either locus.
Remarks
- The linearization is part of the data. The two loci depend on the linearization and not only on ; the companion page demonstrates this in The semistable locus depends on the linearization, not only on the sheaf ↗ and GIT quotients of the projective line for different linearizations ↗.
- The invariant-section formulation. The definition uses invariant sections of positive tensor powers of , not only of itself; this is why a suitable common multiple of the degrees of a finite generating set, and not a single power of , is needed in the projectivity arguments of this page (The invariant section ring and the projective GIT quotient).
- Embedded comparison. The comparison requires relating the full section ring to the embedding’s homogeneous coordinate ring and lifting invariants under the polynomial-ring surjection. These arguments, in addition to the positive-power comparison, are proved in Projective GIT quotient for a linear action and The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring.
- Finiteness of the stabilizer. For a complex affine algebraic group , a closed subgroup is finite if and only if (Global and local dimension of classical varieties).
Invariants of a localization at an invariant element
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the Reynolds-operator suppliers. Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group acting rationally on a commutative -algebra by algebra automorphisms, with Reynolds operator (Complete reducibility and the Reynolds operator for a complex reductive group). Suppose is graded and acts by graded algebra automorphisms, with preserving degrees. Then for every homogeneous one has compatibly with the grading, and consequently , where is the degree-zero part of the localization.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group , a rational -algebra that is graded with acting by graded algebra automorphisms, the Reynolds operator , and a homogeneous invariant element .
Reynolds operator. is -equivariant, restricts to the identity on , is -linear and idempotent, and its image is exactly ; moreover every rational -module is a direct sum of simple submodules, so every -stable submodule of a rational -module has a -stable complement. (Complete reducibility and the Reynolds operator for a complex reductive group, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring)
Rational modules. A rational -module is one in which every vector lies in a finite-dimensional -stable subspace on which acts by a morphism; a -stable subspace of a rational -module is again rational, and a direct sum of rational modules is rational. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)
Graded conventions. In a graded ring, multiplication by a homogeneous element shifts degrees, so the kernel of multiplication by on a graded module is a graded submodule; the localization of a graded ring at a homogeneous element carries the induced -grading, and the action of by graded automorphisms on extends to because is invariant. (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)
AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Reynolds-operator and complete-reducibility suppliers and is used only through them. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
The localized Reynolds operator. Define by . This is well defined: if , then in for some , and applying the -linear operator to this relation (with the invariant elements , pulled out) gives , so in . The map is -linear: for and , one has and .
The converse inclusion. Let be the kernel of the localization map ; it is a -stable submodule because is invariant and acts by automorphisms, and it is a rational -module as a submodule of the rational module by [F2]. By complete reducibility there is a -stable complement with ; in particular . The complement is supplied by the complete-reducibility theorem, so this step inherits the Axiom of Choice and makes no new selection [F4].
Image and fixed points. is idempotent and has image exactly : the image is contained in because , and an element with is fixed by . Consequently , since consists of invariant fractions.
Let and write with , , ; then . For every the element lies in , while the equality in says precisely that for some , i.e. . Hence , so for all and ; thus . With step 2.1 this gives .
Gradings. The action is by graded automorphisms, so the invariant subspace of a graded rational -module is graded; both sides of are graded submodules of the graded ring (the localization of the graded subalgebra at the homogeneous element is graded, and is graded). Taking degree-zero parts of the equality gives . The hypothesis that preserves degrees is what makes the Reynolds projection compatible with the grading in the computation of step 1.1, and the identity above is compatible with the gradings.
Steps 2.1 and 3.1 establish , and step 4.1 gives the graded consequence , as claimed.
Remarks
- No domain hypothesis. The proof uses complete reducibility to split off the -torsion of ; this replaces the clearing-denominators step of the classical treatment and makes the identity valid for an arbitrary graded rational -algebra, without assuming that is a domain.
- Degree preservation. The hypothesis that preserves degrees enters only through the compatibility of the invariant identifications with the -grading; it holds for the natural graded actions used on this page.
Nonvanishing charts of sections of an ample linearization are affine
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the embedding suppliers. Let be a complex projective variety, let be an ample -linearized invertible sheaf, and let be a global section with . Then the nonvanishing locus is an affine open subset of ; if is -invariant, then is -stable. Consequently the charts , for and , form an open cover of by affine -stable subsets. Here, for any complex affine algebraic group , denotes the union of these invariant nonvanishing loci; for reductive this agrees with Semistable and stable points for a linearization.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex projective variety with an algebraic action of the complex affine algebraic group , an ample -linearized invertible sheaf on , a global section , and a -equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves for some .
Equivariant embedding. There are , a finite-dimensional rational -module and a -equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves, obtained from the complete linear system ; in particular for every . (An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power, Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring)
Projective charts and high-degree lifting. A closed subscheme of projective space has affine standard charts . The ideal sheaf is coherent by Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme and Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward. The sequence and Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology make restriction surjective when , which holds for large by Serre vanishing. The source space consists of homogeneous degree- forms by Cohomology of O(d) on projective space (also for and ). No surjectivity in every degree is assumed. (Serre vanishing for coherent sheaves and ample twists, Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals, Standard opens are affine)
Nonvanishing loci. For invertible sheaves the nonvanishing locus of a section is open, and intersecting with an affine open gives an affine open; for sections one has . (A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens)
Proof
Fix the equivariant closed immersion of [F1], so that . For a local trivialization of in which corresponds to a regular function , the section corresponds to ; hence and have the same nonvanishing locus, (this is the local computation of the nonvanishing locus, valid for arbitrary sections, not only invariant ones).
If is -invariant, then for every the equality means in the fibre of at ; since the fibre map is a -linear isomorphism, if and only if . Hence is -stable.
Under the embedding of step 1.1, is a section of . For the coherent ideal sheaf in , Serre vanishing gives for sufficiently large . The ideal-sheaf exact sequence then makes restriction of degree- forms onto surjective. Lift to such a form . Its nonvanishing locus equals , since taking a positive power does not change vanishing in a line fibre. Hence , a closed subscheme of the standard affine Proj chart, and is affine. No projective-normality assumption is used.
Every has, by the invariant-section union specified in the Statement, an invariant section with , hence lies in the affine -stable chart of steps 1.2 and 2.1; the charts therefore cover .
Remarks
- Why the power is needed. The affineness conclusion is obtained through the very ample power of [F1]; the section itself is replaced by its power, which does not change the nonvanishing locus by step 1.1.
- No separatedness hypothesis. The argument uses only the closed-immersion presentation of a projective variety and the standard affine charts of projective space.
The section ring of an ample invertible sheaf is finitely generated
Statement
Assume AC as inherited from the projective and sheaf-cohomology suppliers. Let be a projective scheme over and an ample invertible sheaf on (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). Then the section ring is a finitely generated graded -algebra, hence a Noetherian ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A projective -scheme , an ample invertible sheaf on , and the section ring .
Very ample positive power. Applied to the proper finite-type morphism and the ample sheaf , the very-ampleness theorem gives an integer , an integer and global sections of generating whose associated morphism is a closed immersion with . (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme, Generating line-bundle sections define a morphism to projective space, Global generation by the evaluation map)
Graded sections of a coherent sheaf. For a coherent sheaf on the graded -module has a finitely generated tail: there is with finitely generated over ; the extended sheaf along the closed immersion is coherent. Each individual space is finite-dimensional over . (High-degree section module is finite graded, Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field)
The coordinate ring image. Let and let be the homogeneous coordinate ring of the closed immersion , namely the image of the graded restriction map . It is a finitely generated graded -algebra, being a quotient of ; the restriction maps need not be surjective onto every space of global sections. (Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals)
Hilbert basis. A finitely generated algebra over a field is Noetherian. (Hilbert basis theorem: if is Noetherian then is Noetherian)
Proof
If then is generated by the empty set and is Noetherian; assume henceforth . Fix the integer and the closed immersion of [F1], so that in the following denotes and for all , .
The graded modules . For put . Under the identification of step 1.1 and the projection formula for the finite morphism , for the coherent sheaf on ; hence by [F2] each has a finitely generated tail over . A graded -module whose tail is finitely generated is finitely generated: the missing finite initial part is a finite-dimensional -vector space by [F2], and an extension of a finitely generated module by a finite-dimensional one is finitely generated. So each is a finitely generated graded -module.
The section modules over the coordinate ring image. Let be the image in [F3]. It is a finitely generated -algebra. For in the kernel of , its restriction is the zero section on , so multiplication by is zero on every ; hence the -action on each factors through . The finite -module generators of step 2.1 therefore also generate as an -module. In particular and each of the finitely many are finite -modules.
Conclusion. The decomposition and step 3.1 show that is a finite module over the finitely generated -algebra . A finite set of algebra generators of together with a finite set of -module generators of generates as a -algebra. Hence is a finitely generated -algebra, and it is Noetherian by [F4].
Remarks
- The proof uses only the ample power. Neither the very-ampleness of itself nor a Hilbert--Mumford criterion is used; the finite generation comes from the graded-module theorem on projective space applied to the coherent sheaves .
- No separatedness issue. is a projective -scheme, in particular proper and of finite type over ; all cited suppliers are stated in that register.
Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory suppliers. Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group and let be a finitely generated graded commutative -algebra with , equipped with a rational action of by graded algebra automorphisms (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules). Then the graded invariant subalgebra is a finitely generated -algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group , a finitely generated graded -algebra with and a rational action of on by graded algebra automorphisms.
Local finiteness. Every element of a rational -module lies in a finite-dimensional -stable subspace on which acts by a morphism; sums of finitely many such subspaces are again finite-dimensional and -stable. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)
Finite homogeneous generation. There are finitely many homogeneous elements generating as a -algebra, with , because ; the invariant subalgebra is graded, . (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)
Surjectivity of invariants. If is a surjective -equivariant homomorphism of rational -algebras, then ; the conclusion holds also for the graded subalgebra of invariants. (The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring (c), (d))
Invariants of a finite-dimensional module. For a finite-dimensional rational -module the invariant algebra is a finitely generated -algebra, and as a graded algebra. (Invariants of a finite-dimensional module are finitely generated)
Proof
A finite-dimensional generating module. By [F2] choose homogeneous generators of . By [F1] each lies in a finite-dimensional -stable subspace ; since and the action is graded, the homogeneous components of the elements of span a finite-dimensional graded -stable space containing , so we may take each graded. Then is a finite-dimensional graded -stable subspace of whose elements contain the generators , hence generate as a -algebra.
The symmetric algebra surjection. The universal property of the symmetric algebra of the finite-dimensional graded vector space gives a graded -algebra surjection sending identically onto its image in ; it is -equivariant because is -stable and the identification carries the induced action to the action on polynomial functions.
By [F3] the induced map on invariants is surjective, and is a finitely generated -algebra by [F4].
A quotient of a finitely generated -algebra is finitely generated, so is finitely generated, as claimed; the argument is the graded form of Nagata's theorem used by Brion and Hoskins.
Remarks
- Noetherianity of . The hypothesis that is finitely generated over is what makes Noetherian and the quotient argument in step 3.1 available; no Hilbert-basis input beyond finite generation is used.
- Gradings. The proof keeps the -grading throughout: the generators are homogeneous, the module is chosen graded, and the surjection of step 2.1 is a graded map, so the finite generating set produced for consists of homogeneous invariants.
Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers. Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group, a finite-dimensional rational -module, a -stable closed projective algebraic set with homogeneous coordinate ring (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and let be homogeneous of positive degree. Then:
(i) the nonvanishing locus is affine and -stable; (ii) , the degree-zero part of the localization of the invariant ring; (iii) the affine quotient morphism corresponding to the inclusion is a good quotient of the -action on (Good and geometric quotients for group actions), with ; (iv) the morphisms for varying are compatible on overlaps , in the sense that and both restrict to the affine quotient of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group , a finite-dimensional rational -module , a -stable closed projective algebraic set with homogeneous coordinate ring and homogeneous invariant of positive degree .
Charts are affine and stable. For the homogeneous coordinate ring , is the affine Proj chart of [F2], even when is reducible. Invariance of makes its zero locus -stable: for lifts in the affine cone. Thus is -stable.
Sections of the basic opens. On the chart of one has for every graded -module , naturally in and ; for this identifies , and is the affine chart of with coordinate ring . (Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open, Associated sheaf of a graded module on Proj, Standard opens are affine)
Invariants of a localization. is a graded rational -algebra with acting by graded algebra automorphisms and with Reynolds operator preserving degrees (naturality of the Reynolds operator applied to the graded pieces); hence compatibly with the grading and . (Invariants of a localization at an invariant element, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring)
Finite generation. is a finitely generated graded -algebra by Nagata's theorem; moreover for a finitely generated graded -algebra with and a homogeneous element of positive degree, the degree-zero part of the localization is a finitely generated -algebra. Finite generation of is Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated; the degree-zero localization assertion is proved directly in step 1.2.
The affine quotient and Reynolds splitting. The classical affine invariant-theory theorem gives the categorical quotient and the closed-point orbit conclusions. For any rational algebra , its Reynolds operator is a -linear retraction , natural under equivariant maps, so it preserves invariant ideals; quotient maps are surjective on invariants. Tensor products compute affine scheme fibres, and every nonzero algebra has a prime ideal under AC. These facts give the scheme good-quotient clauses explicitly below, without identifying complex closed points with all primes. (Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring, Complete reducibility and the Reynolds operator for a complex reductive group, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)
AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers and is not used directly here. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Affineness and stability. If , its homogeneous coordinate ring is zero, the invariant ring and every localized chart ring are zero, both loci and every quotient target are empty, and all conclusions hold with the empty morphisms. Assume henceforth . The sheaf is ample and linearized, and is an invariant global section of (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and [F2] identifies with the affine chart of . Its -stability follows from [F1].
Finite generation of the invariant ring of the chart. is a finitely generated graded -algebra with by [F4], so is a finitely generated -algebra by the second part of [F4]: indeed, if with homogeneous of degrees and , then is generated by the finitely many elements together with the elements for all exponent vectors with , because every monomial of degree divisible by splits as with and the remainder of degree divisible by .
The invariant coordinate ring of the chart. By [F2] the chart of has coordinate ring , and the affine chart has coordinate ring . By [F3] applied to the graded rational -algebra and the homogeneous invariant , ; this proves (ii).
The chart quotient is a scheme good quotient. Put and by step 2.1. The affine scheme morphism is invariant and affine. It is surjective at every scheme point: the -linear Reynolds retraction splits , so for every prime tensoring gives an injection . This nonzero fibre algebra has a prime by [F5]. On each principal target open , the rational-localized Reynolds computation gives , so the sheaf clause holds on a basis and hence on all opens. For a closed invariant subset with radical stable ideal , invariant exactness gives . Applying the same Reynolds-splitting fibre argument to shows its image is exactly the scheme closed subset . If two such subsets are disjoint, their ideals satisfy ; write , apply Reynolds, and use preservation of stable ideals to obtain , so their scheme images are disjoint. These are all good-quotient clauses, proving (iii); the target is , so .
Compatibility. For invariant homogeneous of positive degrees the charts satisfy and , and localizing the identifications of step 2.1 at gives with invariant ring ; both and restrict on to the affine quotient morphism with target , because the corresponding ring maps are the canonical localizations of and of at the same localization. This is assertion (iv) and completes the proof; no new choice is made, the Axiom of Choice being inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers [F6].
Remarks
- Degrees in the overlap. The identification on the overlap is functoriality of localization: the chart ring is the localization of at , and likewise for the invariant rings, so no choice of isomorphism is involved.
- Finite generation of the chart. Step 1.2 proves this by a finite list of monomial fractions; it does not apply the positively graded finite-generation lemma to a degree-zero localization.
Projective GIT quotient for a linear action
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the affine invariant-theory and quotient suppliers. Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group, a finite-dimensional rational -module, a -stable closed projective algebraic set, its homogeneous coordinate ring (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and . Put and (Semistable and stable points for a linearization). Then:
(i) is a finitely generated graded -algebra with when (and when ), and is a projective -scheme of finite type;
(ii) and are open -stable subsets of , and is the union of the affine -stable charts for ;
(iii) the chart morphisms of Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action glue to a -invariant morphism that is a good quotient in the sense of Good and geometric quotients for group actions; is surjective, , and for one has if and only if ;
(iv) is open in , , and is a geometric quotient; a point is stable if and only if is finite and is closed in , equivalently if and only if is finite and lies in a chart , , in which all -orbits are closed; and if then is a geometric quotient of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group , a finite-dimensional rational -module , a -stable closed projective algebraic set with homogeneous coordinate ring and invariant part , and .
Finite generation of invariants. For , is a finitely generated graded -algebra with and finite-dimensional graded pieces, and the action of is rational by graded algebra automorphisms; hence is a finitely generated graded -algebra with . (Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated, homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set)
Projectivity of the Proj. A finitely generated graded -algebra with and finite-dimensional graded pieces has a projective -scheme of finite type; in particular is projective of finite type. (Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective)
The affine chart quotients. For every homogeneous of positive degree the chart is affine and -stable with , and the affine quotient morphism is a good quotient; the various agree on overlaps. (Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action, Nonvanishing charts of sections of an ample linearization are affine)
Locality and the affine picture. Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical; a good quotient is geometric exactly when its fibres are the orbits. Every fibre of the affine categorical quotient of an affine -variety contains a unique closed orbit, for an affine -variety the stable locus (closed orbit and finite stabilizer) is characterized by the affine stable-locus theorem, with geometric quotient onto its image, and a closed subgroup of the finite-type group is finite exactly when its dimension is zero. (Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients, The stable locus has a geometric quotient, Stable points of an affine action, Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient)
Orbit and stabilizer behaviour. The function is upper semicontinuous and is lower semicontinuous; for every point one has , the orbit closure is the union of and of orbits of strictly smaller dimension, every orbit closure contains a closed orbit, and every orbit of minimal dimension in a -stable closed set is closed. (Semicontinuity of stabilizer and orbit dimension, Orbit dimension and closed orbits for complex group actions, Global and local dimension of classical varieties)
Good-quotient clauses. A good quotient is -invariant and surjective, satisfies , maps closed -stable subsets to closed subsets and disjoint closed -stable subsets to disjoint subsets, and is categorical; a geometric quotient has the -orbits as its fibres, with the quotient topology and sheaf conditions. (Good and geometric quotients for group actions, Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties)
Separate a point from a disjoint invariant closed subset. For an affine reductive-group action with categorical quotient , if is closed and invariant and , there is an invariant regular function with and (Invariants separate a stable point from a disjoint closed invariant subset).
Proof
The invariant ring and the target. If , its homogeneous coordinate ring is zero, the invariant ring and every localized chart ring are zero, both loci and every quotient target are empty, and all conclusions hold with the empty morphisms. Assume henceforth . By [F1] is a finitely generated graded -algebra with and finite-dimensional graded pieces; by [F2] the scheme is projective of finite type over . This is assertion (i).
The semistable locus. By definition exactly when for some homogeneous invariant of positive degree, i.e. exactly when lies in one of the charts with ; each such chart is open, affine and -stable by [F3], so is open and -stable and covered by the charts .
Gluing the chart morphisms. The chart morphisms of [F3] agree on overlaps by the compatibility assertion of [F3]; since the with cover and the cover , they glue to a -invariant morphism whose restrictions are the good quotients . For any positive-degree invariants , the function on is the pullback of the same fraction on ; it is nonzero precisely on and on , respectively. Thus , since the cover , so the chart maps really are target restrictions of . By [F4] the good-quotient property is local on the target, so is a good quotient; in particular by [F6] it is surjective, its pullback identifies with , and images of closed -stable (respectively disjoint closed -stable) subsets are closed (respectively disjoint).
Closed charts and invariant vanishing. Call a chart , , closed if every -orbit contained in is closed in , and let be the union of the closed charts; this is an open -stable subset of . If is closed and , then is an open -stable subset of , so every orbit contained in is closed in as well. For a homogeneous invariant section , if then its closed zero locus is -stable and contains , hence also contains every . Equivalently, if such a lies in a chart and , then , so .
The stable locus lies in the closed charts. Let and choose with (step 1.2). The set is closed and -stable in by [F5] and is disjoint from the closed orbit , whose stabilizers are conjugate to the finite group . Since and are disjoint closed -stable subsets of the affine chart, the good-quotient property [F4] gives . Thus , and the affine quotient separation lemma [F7] gives with and . By [F3] write with homogeneous. Choose and put ; then is homogeneous invariant of positive degree and . Its chart satisfies , and if then , so ; hence every point of has finite stabilizer. If an orbit were not closed in , its boundary in would contain a point ; by [F5] the orbit has dimension strictly smaller than . But every point of has finite stabilizer, so every orbit in has dimension by the orbit-stabilizer formula [F5], a contradiction. Thus is a closed chart containing . Every stable point lies in such a chart, so .
Points of closed charts with finite stabilizer are stable. Let with finite and choose a closed chart containing . The fibre is closed in and contains , so it contains . Since and by step 2.1, the fibre lies in . Thus every lies in the closure of computed in , and closedness of the orbit in that chart forces . Hence is closed in and . With step 2.3 this gives .
Fibres of . Let . If , choose with ; then and, since restricts by step 2.1, , so the closures of and in meet by the unique-closed-orbit property of the affine fibre ([F4]), hence their closures in meet. Conversely let and choose with ; by the vanishing observation of step 2.2 the points also lie in , and lies in both closures computed in , so by continuity and . This proves (iii).
Openness and the geometric quotient. By step 3.1 the stable locus is . The union of charts is open and -stable, and is open in by upper semicontinuity of ([F5]); hence is open in , and it is -stable because stabilizers of points in one orbit are conjugate. On a closed chart the affine quotient of [F3] is a good quotient whose fibres contain a unique closed orbit ([F4]); since every orbit in is closed, each fibre is a single orbit, so is a geometric quotient. These geometric quotients agree on overlaps by [F3], so by locality of the geometric-quotient property ([F4]) they glue to a geometric quotient , where is the union of the open sets over the closed charts, hence open in . The closed -stable subset is mapped by the quotient to a closed subset of by clause (iv) of [F6], so is open in and hence in ; and because the fibres of are the orbits and is -stable. The restriction of the geometric quotient to the open -stable subset is again a geometric quotient onto by locality, so is a geometric quotient. This proves (iv); if then and the same argument shows that is a geometric quotient of .
Assertions (i)-(iv) are established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii) in step 1.2, (iii) in steps 2.1 and 3.2, and (iv) in steps 2.3, 3.1 and 4.1.
Remarks
- No Hilbert--Mumford criterion. Semistability and stability are read off from invariant sections and orbit closures only; no numerical criterion is stated or used.
- The linearization is a hypothesis. The action on and hence the quotient come from the linearized structure of ; no item constructs a linearization of an arbitrary ample sheaf.
The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory, Proj and ample-sheaf suppliers. Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety (projective variety classical), and let be an ample -linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). Let and let be its graded invariant subalgebra. Then:
(i) is a finitely generated graded -algebra and the GIT quotient is a projective -scheme of finite type;
(ii) the semistable locus (Semistable and stable points for a linearization) is the union of the affine -stable charts over , , and is open in ; for every one has and , and the Veronese isomorphism identifies the two quotient data;
(iii) the chart morphisms glue to a -invariant morphism that is a good quotient in the sense of Good and geometric quotients for group actions; in particular , is surjective, closed -stable subsets have closed images, and disjoint closed -stable subsets have disjoint images;
(iv) if and is a -equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves (An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power), then and for the linear action, so the definitions of Semistable and stable points for a linearization agree with the embedded ones;
(v) no linearization of an arbitrary ample invertible sheaf is constructed or assumed possible, and no Hilbert--Mumford criterion is used or claimed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group , a complex projective variety with an algebraic action, an ample -linearized invertible sheaf , its section ring and invariant part , and an equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves when one is chosen.
Finite generation. The section ring is a finitely generated graded -algebra, its invariant subalgebra is finitely generated, and is projective of finite type over (The section ring of an ample invertible sheaf is finitely generated, Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated, Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective).
Equivariant very ample power. Some positive power of gives a -equivariant closed immersion into a projective space of a finite-dimensional rational -module, via its complete linear system (An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power).
Linear-action GIT theorem. For a -stable closed , the linear-action theorem gives its semistable/stable loci, the good quotient from the invariant coordinate ring, the orbit-closure description of quotient fibres, and the geometric quotient on the stable locus (Projective GIT quotient for a linear action).
Coordinate charts. For a homogeneous coordinate ring of a projective embedding and a homogeneous section , the chart is affine with coordinate ring ; the chart construction is compatible with localization (homogeneous coordinate ring, Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action).
Finite section modules over the coordinate ring. Put , let be the image of in the section ring of , and for put . The graded section-module theorem gives a finitely generated tail of each over ; the finitely many initial graded pieces are finite-dimensional by projective coherent cohomology, so each full is finite over . The kernel of acts by zero on every , so is a finite -module (High-degree section module is finite graded, Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field). For , the module is faithful over because an element annihilating it annihilates ; Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element therefore makes integral over .
Extension from a section chart. If is a positive-degree section and , then after multiplying by a power of the function extends to a global section of the corresponding power of ; hence (Extend a quasi-coherent section after multiplying by a power).
Reynolds operator and localization. For a rational -algebra, the Reynolds operator is natural under equivariant maps, is linear over invariant elements, preserves a -stable grading, and invariants commute with localization at a homogeneous invariant (The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring, Invariants of a localization at an invariant element).
Good quotients. Good quotients are local on the target; the affine chart quotients in [F4] glue to the section-ring quotient, and the good quotient clauses include the invariant structure sheaf and closed/disjoint image properties (Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients, Good and geometric quotients for group actions).
Proj and Veronese. Standard homogeneous opens cover Proj; for a graded ring, passing to a positive Veronese gives a canonical Proj isomorphism with matching localized degree-zero rings (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading).
Proof
Finite generation and projectivity. By F1 the invariant section ring is a finitely generated graded -algebra with degree-zero part , so is projective of finite type. This proves (i).
Choose an embedded model. Fix any equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves, whose existence is F2. Let , , and let be the homogeneous coordinate ring, the image of the restriction map .
The full section ring is finite over . For , the graded module is the section module of the coherent sheaf on , so it is finite over by F5. If a homogeneous polynomial in restricts to zero on , then it acts by zero on each , since multiplication by it is restriction followed by multiplication of sections. Thus the -actions on the factor through , each is a finite -module, and is a finite -module. By the faithful-module criterion in F5 every homogeneous is integral over .
Invariant sections give invariant coordinate charts. Let be homogeneous of positive degree. Since it is integral over , it satisfies a monic relation over ; taking the homogeneous component of total degree gives a relation with (zero when ). Apply the Reynolds operator of to this relation. Its naturality under multiplication by the invariant and under the inclusion gives where by F7. If at , not all can vanish at , since evaluating the displayed relation in the one-dimensional fiber of would otherwise give . Hence every point semistable for the full section ring lies in a nonvanishing chart of a positive-degree invariant in . The reverse inclusion is immediate from , so the embedded semistable locus equals . The same monic relation shows that the charts with cover : for any homogeneous prime avoiding , choose outside it; some coefficient in its relation must also be outside the prime.
Identify the two quotient targets chartwise. For , the affine chart has ring by F4. Fractions in are regular on , and F6 shows that every regular function there is such a fraction, so as -algebras. Taking invariants and using F7 gives . The for cover both and by step 2.1; these identical chart rings and their localization maps therefore glue to a canonical isomorphism . On every chart the quotient morphisms from are induced by the same inclusion of invariant regular functions into , so identifies the linear-action quotient with the section-ring quotient.
Compare positive tensor powers and embedded data. For , the -th Veronese of is , so F9 identifies the Proj quotient data for and . The nonvanishing locus of a section equals that of every positive tensor power, so the semistable loci coincide; closedness of orbits in that same locus and finiteness of stabilizers then give equality of the stable loci. For the fixed compatible embedding in step 1.2, step 2.1 proves that the definitions on agree with those from the full section ring. Moreover the equivariant surjection induces a surjection by F7; hence invariant forms on lift to invariant forms on , giving . The orbit closure of a point of in the ambient semistable locus stays in , because is closed and invariant; closedness there is therefore equivalent to closedness in , and stabilizers agree. Thus . This proves (iv) and all Veronese claims.
Transport GIT properties. The linear-action theorem F3 applies to . By steps 2.1 and 3.1 its semistable set, quotient target, and quotient morphism identify with , , and respectively. Thus the section-ring morphism is a good quotient with the orbit-closure description of its fibres, proving (iii); the linear theorem also gives openness and -stability of both loci, the stable geometric quotient, and the invariant-chart criterion. Since stability is defined by finite stabilizer and closed orbit inside the same identified semistable set, its locus agrees with , proving (ii) and the stable-locus assertions in (iv). All these constructions use the given linearization and the cited orbit/quotient results; they construct no linearization and use no Hilbert--Mumford criterion, proving (v).
Assertions (i)-(v) are established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii)-(iv) in steps 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2, and (v) in step 4.1. The proof uses only the given linearization and the orbit/quotient suppliers; it constructs no linearization and invokes no numerical criterion.
Remarks
- The repair of the Veronese step. The projectivity of uses Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective in its corrected form, for the particular common multiple supplied there; the equality of the loci under every positive power is proved separately and does not use generation in degree one of an arbitrary Veronese.
- No linearization existence. The result assumes the linearization of .
Good and geometric quotient on the stable locus
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the named suppliers. In the setting of The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring let , and let be the good quotient. Then:
(i) is open and -stable in , is open in , and ;
(ii) is a geometric quotient: its fibres are exactly the -orbits in , and ;
(iii) for every the identification carries onto , and the two geometric quotients are identified by the Veronese isomorphism;
(iv) the stable locus admits the invariant-chart description: if and only if is finite and there exist and with and the action of on the affine chart having all orbits closed;
(v) if then itself is a geometric quotient of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The setting of the projective GIT theorem: a complex reductive affine algebraic group , a complex projective variety , an ample -linearized invertible sheaf , the good quotient , and the locally closed stable locus .
Linear case. For a linear action of on a -stable closed : is a finitely generated graded -algebra, and are open -stable subsets, the chart morphisms glue to a good quotient , the set is open with , the restriction is a geometric quotient with orbit fibres and , a point of is stable if and only if it has finite stabilizer and lies in a chart in which all -orbits are closed, equivalently if and only if it has finite stabilizer and closed orbit in , and implies that is a geometric quotient of . (Projective GIT quotient for a linear action)
Ample case and Veronese. Let be an ample -linearized invertible sheaf with its section ring and the good quotient; for every one has and , the Veronese isomorphism identifies the quotient data, and for a -equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves one has and for with its linear action. (The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring, Semistable and stable points for a linearization, An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power, Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading)
Transfer of coordinate charts. If is a homogeneous invariant in the embedded homogeneous coordinate ring, its restriction is an invariant section and . Conversely every invariant homogeneous coordinate-ring element has an invariant polynomial lift by naturality of the Reynolds operator under the surjection from the polynomial ring. Since is a -equivariant isomorphism onto , corresponding points have the same stabilizer and orbit closedness on these matching charts agrees. This fact concerns sections coming from the embedded coordinate ring; arbitrary global sections need not arise this way. (Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring)
AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the linear-action and quotient suppliers and is used only through them. (The Axiom of Choice)
Saturation of a section chart. For a positive-degree invariant section and any positive-degree invariant section defining an overlapping chart, the degree-zero function on pulls back from the Proj chart. Therefore, on , its value is nonzero exactly where is nonzero. Since the charts cover , the chart quotient has target and . (The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring, Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action)
Proof
The equivariant embedding and the reduction. Choose and a -equivariant closed immersion with as -linearized invertible sheaves ([F2]); put and . By [F2] the isomorphism identifies with and with ; the Veronese isomorphism identifies with . The latter full section ring need not equal the homogeneous coordinate ring . Instead, the main theorem [F2] identifies their quotient targets canonically on each invariant coordinate chart: both localized degree-zero rings equal the invariant regular functions on that affine chart, these charts cover both targets, and their localization maps agree. The resulting canonical isomorphism identifies with because both chart morphisms arise from the same inclusions of invariant functions.
Transport of (i) and (ii). By [F1] applied to the linear action on the stable locus is open and -stable, is open in , , and is a geometric quotient with orbit fibres and . Transporting along and the identification of step 1.1 gives that is open and -stable, is open in , , and is a geometric quotient with orbit fibres and . This proves (i) and (ii).
Veronese compatibility (iii). The locus equalities and and the identification of the quotient data by the Veronese isomorphism are the corresponding clauses of [F2]; closedness of an orbit in the semistable locus and finiteness of a stabilizer are read in the same identified locus, so the geometric restrictions to the stable loci are identified as well. This proves (iii).
Chart description (iv). Let , so by step 2.1. By [F1] the point lies in a chart , , in which all -orbits are closed, and is finite; by [F3] the form restricts to an invariant section with , and identifies the stabilizers and the closedness of orbits, so all orbits in are closed and is finite. Conversely let and with all orbits in closed and finite. By [F5], is saturated. The quotient map is constant on and hence on its closure in , since the fibre over is closed. That fibre lies in , because . Therefore any point of lies in ; as the orbit is closed there by assumption, it has no boundary point in and is closed in the semistable locus. Thus . This proves (iv).
The case (v). If , then by step 2.1, so is a geometric quotient of by [F1]; transporting along the identifications of step 1.1 gives that is a geometric quotient of . This proves (v).
Assertions (i)-(v) are established: (i) and (ii) in step 2.1, (iii) in step 2.2, (iv) in step 3.1 and (v) in step 3.2. No new selection is made; the Axiom of Choice is inherited from the named suppliers [F4].
Remarks
- Both descriptions of stability. The invariant-chart description (iv) is the form in which stability is checked on the companion page; it is transported from the linear-action theorem through the equivariant embedding in steps 1.1 and 3.1, so the ample case is reduced to the linear one rather than re-proved chart by chart.
- No numerical criterion. As in the linear-action theorem, no Hilbert--Mumford criterion is involved; all statements are about orbits and invariant sections.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22
- P. E. Newstead, Geometric Invariant Theory, lecture notes, CIMAT Guanajuato 2006 (CEL/HAL; archived copy)
- Victoria Hoskins, Moduli Problems and Geometric Invariant Theory, FU Berlin lecture notes (2015/16)
- I. Dolgachev, Lectures on Invariant Theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 296, Cambridge University Press, 2003