Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective GIT from Linearized Line Bundles

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page constructs the projective GIT quotient of a projective variety by a reductive group with respect to an ample linearized invertible sheaf, and it proves which quotient properties hold on the semistable and on the stable locus. The construction is the classical one: take the graded ring of invariant sections of all positive tensor powers of the linearized sheaf and form its Proj. The linearization is part of the data, not a consequence of it, so every theorem assumes a linearized sheaf outright. The construction begins with this specified equivariant structure on the ample sheaf.

The first definitions fix the vocabulary. A G-linearization of an invertible sheaf is an action on the total space covering the action on X whose fibre maps are linear; equivalently it is a cocycle isomorphism σ∗L→pr⁡2∗L on G×X. Tensor powers inherit linearizations, their section spaces are rational G-modules, and the direct sum of these spaces is a graded rational G-algebra, the section ring R(X,L). Twisting a linearization by a character changes the induced action on sections and hence the invariant rings, so the linearization genuinely matters.

The quotient is then built chart by chart. For a homogeneous invariant section f the nonvanishing locus Xf is an affine G-stable open subset, and the invariant functions on it are the degree-zero part (R(X,L)G)(f) of the localized invariant ring. The resulting affine quotients are good quotients and agree on overlaps, so they glue to a good quotient from the semistable locus onto Proj⁡R(X,L)G; the fibre description is the expected one, in terms of closures of orbits meeting inside the semistable locus. The tools are proved on this page: finite generation of the invariant ring in the linear case and of the full section ring in the ample case, affineness of the invariant charts, the affine localization computation for invariants, and projectivity of the Proj, which rests on a corrected Veronese generation lemma for finitely generated graded algebras.

On the stable locus the quotient becomes an orbit space. A point is stable when its orbit is closed in the semistable locus and its stabilizer is finite, and equivalently when it has finite stabilizer and lies in an invariant section chart on which every orbit is closed; the stable locus is open, its image in the quotient is open, and the restriction of the quotient to it is a geometric quotient. The ample case is reduced to the linear one by an equivariant embedding after a positive tensor power, using the same reduction that turns invariant sections of powers of L into invariant homogeneous forms on projective space.

No Hilbert--Mumford criterion is stated or used anywhere on the page: semistability and stability are read off from invariant sections and orbit closures alone. The companion page shows in two computations that the (semi)stable loci and the quotient depend on the chosen linearization and not only on the isomorphism class of the underlying ample sheaf.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety

Definition

Let G be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a classical complex variety X (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules, Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties), and let L be an invertible sheaf on X with total space p:L→X (Invertible sheaves), the total space being obtained by gluing U×A1 over local frames of L using their invertible regular transition functions, and the projection being a morphism of locally ringed spaces (Morphisms of locally ringed spaces). Write σ:G×X→X for the action.

A G-linearization of L is an algebraic G-action m:G×L→L on the total space such that

  • p(m(g,ℓ))=g p(ℓ) for all g∈G, ℓ∈L, and
  • for every g∈G and x∈X the fibre map Lx→Lgx, ℓ↦gℓ, is C-linear.

A G-linearized invertible sheaf is an invertible sheaf together with a linearization; the pair is written (L,m). Equivalently, a linearization is an isomorphism φ:σ∗L→pr2∗L of sheaves on G×X satisfying the cocycle identity

pr23∗φ∘(idG×σ)∗φ=(mG×idX)∗φ,

where mG:G×G→G is the multiplication; at (g,h,x) both sides map the fibre Lghx to Lx. The isomorphism φ sends a vector over gx to its translate by g−1 over x, so its inverse recovers the action on total spaces.

For any algebraic character χ:G→Gm=C× the twist (L,m)χ multiplies the fibre action by χ(g) and is again a linearization of the same invertible sheaf. In particular linearizations are not unique, the trivial action admits the trivial linearization of OX and its twists, and for a finite-dimensional rational G-module V the induced action on the tautological line bundle linearizes OP(V)(−1), and its dual linearizes OP(V)(1).

The two main theorems of this page always assume that a linearization is given; no general existence of linearizations is claimed here.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the Proj construction. Let S=⨁n≥0Sn be a finitely generated graded commutative C-algebra with S0=C and every Sn finite-dimensional, and suppose S is generated as a C-algebra by homogeneous elements f1,…,fN of positive degrees d1,…,dN; put L=lcm⁡(d1,…,dN) (with L=1 when N=0) and d=kL with k=max⁡(1,N−1).

Then the Veronese subalgebra S(d)=⨁j≥0Sdj is generated in degree one by Sd: every element of S(d) is a polynomial in elements of the finite-dimensional space Sd. Consequently, if Sd≠0, choosing a C-basis g0,…,gM of Sd and the induced graded surjection B=C[x0,…,xM]→S(d), xi↦gi, the canonical isomorphism Proj⁡S≅Proj⁡S(d) exhibits Proj⁡S as a closed subscheme of the projective space PCM=Proj⁡B of finite type over C, and O(1) pulls back to OS(d)(1).

If S+=0, then S=C; and if Sd=0, degree-one generation makes S(d)=C. In either case Proj⁡S=∅ is the closed subscheme V+(x0) of PC0, so the conclusion holds vacuously in that case as well.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice as inherited from the Proj construction; a finitely generated graded C-algebra S with S0=C and dim⁡CSn<∞ for all n; homogeneous generators f1,…,fN of positive degrees d1,…,dN when S+≠0; the numbers L=lcm⁡(d1,…,dN), k=max⁡(1,N−1) and d=kL.

[F1]

The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it is inherited by this item from the Proj construction, whose localization and chart-gluing data use it. (The Axiom of Choice, Projective scheme of a homogeneous quotient and its standard affine charts)

[F2]

Finite homogeneous generation. S is generated as a C-algebra by finitely many homogeneous elements, and every Sn is finite-dimensional. If S+≠0 then the degree-zero part of a generating set may be omitted, so that S is generated by finitely many homogeneous elements f1,…,fN of positive degrees; every element of Sn is then a C-linear combination of monomials f1a1⋯fNaN with ∑aidi=n. (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)

[F3]

Proj dictionary. For a graded ring S with S0=C, the points of Proj⁡S are the homogeneous primes not containing S+, the standard opens are D+(f)=Spec⁡S(f) for homogeneous f of positive degree, and these charts cover Proj⁡S. For the standard graded polynomial ring B=C[x0,…,xM] one has Proj⁡B=PCM. (Projective scheme of a homogeneous quotient and its standard affine charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring)

[F4]

Closed subschemes of projective space. For a homogeneous ideal I⊆B the canonical closed immersion Proj⁡(B/I)↪Proj⁡B=PCM identifies Proj⁡(B/I) with V+(I); its chart rings are the quotients B(g)→(B/I)(g). (Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals)

[F5]

Veronese invariance. There is a canonical isomorphism Proj⁡S≅Proj⁡S(d) mapping D+(f) to D+(fd) with the same coordinate ring S(f)=S(fd)(d), under which OS(d)(1) corresponds to OS(d). (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading)

[F6]

Twisting sheaves. For a graded ring A with A0=C, the sheaf OProj⁡A(1) is the associated sheaf of the shifted graded module A(1), with sections A(1)(g) on the chart D+(g); a degree-zero homomorphism M→N of graded A-modules induces a morphism M~→N~ of associated sheaves, computed on charts by the corresponding localization maps. (Twisting sheaf on Proj, Associated sheaf of a graded module on Proj)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

If S+=0 then Sn=0 for all n≥1 and hence S=S0=C; since every homogeneous prime contains S+=0, the set Proj⁡S is empty, and ∅ is the closed subscheme V+(x0)⊆PC0, so the assertions about Proj⁡S hold vacuously. Assume henceforth S+≠0 and fix homogeneous generators f1,…,fN of S of positive degrees d1,…,dN, with L=lcm⁡(d1,…,dN), k=max⁡(1,N−1) and d=kL.

1.2F2algebra

The generation claim. We show that every monomial f1a1⋯fNaN of degree md with m≥2 is a product of m monomials of degree d. Suppose not, and choose a counterexample with m≥2 minimal; call it M=f1a1⋯fNaN, so that a=(a1,…,aN) has no decomposition a=b1+⋯+bm with bj∈Z≥0N and ∑ibjidi=d. Then a has no sub-vector of degree d=kL: if c≤a had ∑icidi=kL, then a−c would have degree (m−1)kL and would, by minimality of m, decompose into m−1 vectors of degree kL, so a would decompose into m of them.

2.1choosealgebrastep 1.2

Maximal L-blocks. Call v∈Z≥0N an L-block of a if v≤a and ∑ividi=L, and choose a maximal-length family v1,…,vℓ of L-blocks of a with ∑j≤ℓvj≤a; such a maximum exists because every L-block has degree L>0. Then ℓ≤k−1, since otherwise v1+⋯+vk would be a sub-vector of a of degree kL, contradicting step 1.2. Put u:=a−∑j≤ℓvj∈Z≥0N. The vector u contains no L-block: any L-block v≤u would be disjoint from all vj, contradicting maximality of ℓ. Moreover ∑iuidi=md−ℓL≥(mk−k+1)L=((m−1)k+1)L≥(k+1)L≥NL, using m≥2 and k≥N−1.

3.1F2algebrastep 2.1

The box bound. For each i, since L/di is a positive integer and (L/di)ei has degree L, the absence of an L-block in u forces ui<L/di, i.e. ui≤L/di−1. Hence ∑iuidi≤∑i(L/di−1)di=NL−∑idi<NL, contradicting the lower bound ≥NL from step 2.1. Therefore every monomial of degree md, m≥2, is a product of m monomials of degree d; since Smd is spanned by such monomials and S0=C, the Veronese algebra satisfies S(d)=C[Sd] with Sd finite-dimensional.

4.1F3F4F5step 1.1step 3.1

If Sd=0, step 3.1 gives S(d)=C, so its Proj is empty and is a closed subscheme of P0 as in step 1.1; [F5] gives the same conclusion for Proj⁡S. Otherwise choose a basis g0,…,gM of the nonzero finite-dimensional space Sd. The graded map B=C[x0,…,xM]→S(d) sending xi to gi is surjective by step 3.1. Its homogeneous kernel I identifies S(d) with B/I, and [F4] exhibits its Proj as V+(I)⊆PM. The remaining chart arguments concern this nonempty-basis case.

5.1F6algebrastep 4.1

The twisting sheaves. On the covering charts D+(xi) of Proj⁡B, the degree-zero module B(1)(xi) is free with frame xi: every fraction of shifted degree zero is xi times a degree-zero fraction. Its pullback to D+(gi) is therefore free with the corresponding frame gi, which likewise generates S(d)(1)(gi). On overlaps the transition ratios xj/xi pull back to gj/gi. Thus these frame identifications glue to identify the pullback of OProj⁡B(1) with OS(d)(1) by [F6].

5.2F3F4step 3.1step 4.1

Finite type. The charts D+(gi) have rings obtained by quotienting the polynomial ring in the degree-zero ratios xj/xi, hence are finitely generated C-algebras; finitely many charts suffice because S(d) is generated over C by the finite set g0,…,gM by step 3.1, so D+(g0),…,D+(gM) cover Proj⁡S(d). Thus Proj⁡S(d) is a C-scheme of finite type.

6.1F5step 1.1step 4.1step 5.1step 5.2∎

Finally [F5] gives the canonical isomorphism Proj⁡S≅Proj⁡S(d) mapping D+(f) to D+(fd). Composed with step 4.1 it exhibits Proj⁡S as a closed subscheme of PCM, of finite type over C by step 5.2, and by step 5.1 the twisting sheaf O(1) pulls back to OS(d)(1), as claimed; the degenerate case S=C was settled in step 1.1.

Remarks

  • The correcting range of d. The repaired statement singles out the common multiple d=kL with k=max⁡(1,N−1); the original scaffold claimed the conclusion for every common multiple of the degrees of a generating set, which is false. With S=C[x1,x2,x3,x4] graded by deg⁡x1=2, deg⁡x2=12, deg⁡x3=15, deg⁡x4=20, one has L=60, and the monomial x1x24x32x42 has degree 120=2L although it is not a product of two monomials of degree L: no sub-multiset of the degrees {2,12,12,12,12,15,15,20,20} sums to 60. Hence S(L) is not generated in degree one, while the lemma supplies k=N−1=3 and then S(3L) is. (This is Deligne's classical phenomenon, quoted in the weighted-projective-space literature; the proof above is self-contained.)
  • Multiples of d. If A is a standard graded C-algebra, then so is every Veronese A(l): Alm=(Al)m. Applying this to A=S(d) shows that S(d′) is generated in degree one for every multiple d′ of d, Moreover, the maximal-block and box-bound argument of steps 1.2–3.1 works for every integer k≥max⁡(1,N−1): its only bound on k is k≥N−1. Thus the conclusion holds for all sufficiently large multiples kL of L.
  • No Hilbert--Mumford input. The proof uses only the monomial combinatorics of the degrees di and the definitions of Proj⁡ and its twisting sheaves; no criterion for (semi)stability is involved.
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring

Statement

For the projective constant-function conclusions in (ii) and (iii), assume AC inherited from global regular functions projective variety; the remaining conclusions use no choice principle. Let L be a G-linearized invertible sheaf on a classical complex G-variety X (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety). Then:

(i) for every n≥0 the tensor power L⊗n (with L⊗0=OX) carries an induced G-linearization, functorial in L, and the canonical multiplication isomorphisms L⊗r⊗L⊗s→L⊗(r+s) are G-equivariant;

(ii) each space of global sections Γ(X,L⊗n) carries the linear action (g⋅σ)(x)=g σ(g−1x), is a rational G-module (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules), and restriction to a G-stable open subset is G-equivariant; the constant functions in Γ(X,OX) are fixed by G, and if X is projective and irreducible then Γ(X,OX)=C;

(iii) the direct sum R(X,L)=⨁n≥0Γ(X,L⊗n) is a graded commutative C-algebra with G acting by graded algebra automorphisms, so that R(X,L) is a graded rational G-algebra with degree-zero part Γ(X,OX); if X is projective and irreducible this part is C;

(iv) for global sections σ∈Γ(X,L⊗r) and τ∈Γ(X,L⊗s) one has Xσ⊗τ=Xσ∩Xτ, and for a G-invariant section σ and every k≥1 one has Xσ⊗k=Xσ, where σ⊗k∈Γ(X,L⊗kr).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex affine algebraic group G, a classical complex G-variety X (a quasi-compact prevariety over C with an algebraic action), an invertible sheaf L on X with a G-linearization m:G×L→L.

[F1]

Linearization. The action m covers the action map σ:G×X→X, is C-linear on fibres, and is equivalently encoded by an isomorphism φ:σ∗L→pr2∗L over G×X whose pullbacks satisfy the cocycle identity; for g∈G the assignment ℓ↦gℓ is an isomorphism Lx→Lgx of lines. (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety)

[F2]

Rational modules. A rational G-module is a complex vector space with a linear left action in which every vector lies in a finite-dimensional G-stable subspace W on which G→GL(W) is a morphism of varieties. A map from a variety into a finite-dimensional vector space is a morphism exactly when its compositions with a spanning set of linear functionals are regular. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)

[F3]

Tensor powers of invertible sheaves. For invertible L each L⊗n is invertible, OX⊗L≅L, and there are canonical multiplication isomorphisms L⊗r⊗L⊗s→L⊗(r+s) compatible with restriction; these are used to define the graded algebra R(X,L). (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Quasi-coherent module on a scheme)

[F4]

Nonvanishing loci. For global sections s,t of invertible sheaves one has Xs∩Xt=Xs⊗t, and for an affine open U the set U∩Xs is affine; a nonzero section of a line bundle has nonempty nonvanishing locus. (A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme)

[F5]

Affine products. For affine algebraic sets Y,Z the coordinate ring of Y×Z is C[Y]⊗CC[Z], so every regular function on a product of affine models is a finite sum of products of regular functions of the factors. (Products of affine algebraic sets have tensor-product coordinate rings)

[F6]

Quasi-compactness. A classical algebraic prevariety is quasi-compact with a finite affine cover, and affine models form a basis of its topology; hence any open cover can be refined to a finite affine cover, and a section of the structure sheaf that restricts to 0 on such a cover is 0. (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties)

[F7]

Projective functions. Under AC, every global regular function on a nonempty irreducible classical projective variety is constant. (global regular functions projective variety, The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3

Tensor powers. By [F1] the linearization is an isomorphism φ:σ∗L→pr2∗L whose two pullbacks to G×G×X satisfy the cocycle identity. Taking n-th tensor powers and using [F3] gives an isomorphism φ⊗n:σ∗(L⊗n)→pr2∗(L⊗n) satisfying the same cocycle identity, and the corresponding fibre maps are C-linear isomorphisms of lines; hence L⊗n carries an induced G-linearization m⊗n, and a G-equivariant isomorphism L→L′ of linearized invertible sheaves induces G-equivariant isomorphisms L⊗n→L′⊗n, which is functoriality. The canonical multiplication L⊗r⊗L⊗s→L⊗(r+s) is the associativity identification of the same tensor power constructed in two ways, so it intertwines m⊗r⊗m⊗s with m⊗(r+s): on a fibre at x both sides send (gℓ1,gℓ2) to g(ℓ1ℓ2).

1.2F1F5algebra

The action on sections. For σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n) define (g⋅σ)(x):=m⊗n(g,σ(g−1x)), an element of (L⊗n)g g−1x=(L⊗n)x. The assignment (g,x)↦(g⋅σ)(x) is the composition of the morphisms (g,x)↦(g,g−1x), id×σ, and m⊗n, so it is a regular section of pr2∗(L⊗n) over G×X; in particular g⋅σ is a global section for each g. The action is linear in σ, satisfies e⋅σ=σ, and g⋅(h⋅σ)=(gh)⋅σ by the group law of the action on the total space; restricting to a G-stable open subset U⊆X commutes with the formula, so the restriction map is G-equivariant.

1.3F4F5F6choosealgebra

Finite dimensionality of orbits. Fix σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n) and choose, using [F6], a finite affine cover X=U1∪⋯∪Uℓ such that L⊗n∣Uj is trivial, with trivializations τj. On the affine product G×Uj the section (g,x)↦g⋅σ(g−1x) corresponds under τj to a regular function, hence by [F5] to a finite sum ∑rhj,r(g)φj,r(x) with hj,r∈C[G] and φj,r∈O(Uj); write sj,r∈Γ(Uj,L⊗n) for the local section corresponding to φj,r and Vj=spanC{sj,r}r, a finite-dimensional subspace. For every g∈G the restricted section (g⋅σ)∣Uj lies in Vj, so the orbit G⋅σ is contained in the subspace Wσ={s∈Γ(X,L⊗n):s∣Uj∈Vj for all j}, which is finite-dimensional because restriction Γ(X,L⊗n)→⨁jΓ(Uj,L⊗n) is injective by [F6].

1.4F4algebra

Nonvanishing loci. For σ∈Γ(X,L⊗r) and τ∈Γ(X,L⊗s) the identification σ⊗τ∈Γ(X,L⊗r⊗L⊗s) with its image στ∈Γ(X,L⊗(r+s)) is the canonical one, so [F4] gives Xσ⊗τ=Xσ∩Xτ. For a G-invariant σ and k≥1, write σ⊗k for the k-fold product inside Γ(X,L⊗kr); trivializing L near a point x, the section σ corresponds to a regular function f and σ⊗k to fk, so fk is nonzero at x exactly when f is; hence Xσ⊗k=Xσ.

2.1F2F4F7step 1.2step 1.3

Rationality. Let Vσ⊆Wσ be the span of the orbit G⋅σ; it is G-stable by step 1.2 and finite-dimensional by step 1.3. The orbit map G→Vσ, g↦g⋅σ, is a morphism: after choosing a frame of the line fibre at x, each evaluation g↦(g⋅σ)(x) is a regular scalar function by step 1.2. These scalar evaluation functionals span Vσ∗: a section annihilated by all of them is zero, since in a local frame its coefficient is a regular function on a reduced classical variety vanishing at every point. Hence for every σ′∈Vσ the map g↦g⋅σ′ is a morphism, being a linear combination of orbit maps of spanning elements, and choosing a basis of Vσ exhibits the action of G on Vσ through matrices with regular entries; thus Vσ is a finite-dimensional rational G-module on which G acts by an algebraic action, containing σ. As σ was arbitrary, Γ(X,L⊗n) is a rational G-module. For n=0 the formula reads (g⋅f)(x)=f(g−1x), so constant functions are fixed; if X is projective and irreducible, [F7] gives Γ(X,OX)=C under its stated AC assumption.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1

Graded algebra. Define the product of homogeneous elements σ∈Γ(X,L⊗r), τ∈Γ(X,L⊗s) by στ∈Γ(X,L⊗(r+s)) obtained from σ⊗τ under the canonical isomorphism of [F3], extended bilinearly. This makes R(X,L) a commutative graded C-algebra with unit 1∈Γ(X,OX) and degree-zero part Γ(X,OX), because the multiplication maps are the canonical associativity isomorphisms of tensor powers and are C-bilinear and compatible with restriction. By step 1.1 the multiplication is G-equivariant, so each g acts by a graded algebra automorphism, and each graded piece is a rational G-module by step 2.1: R(X,L) is a graded rational G-algebra. If X is projective and irreducible the degree-zero part is C by step 2.1.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1step 3.1∎

Finally (i)-(iv) have been established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii) in steps 1.2, 1.3 and 2.1, (iii) in step 3.1, and (iv) in step 1.4. In particular every space of sections of a tensor power of a linearized invertible sheaf is a rational G-module and R(X,L) is a graded rational G-algebra, as asserted.

Remarks

  • Correction at degree zero. The scaffold wrote Γ(X,OX)=C; this holds for projective irreducible X (as used on this page) but fails for affine X, where Γ(X,OX)=O(X) is the whole coordinate ring. The statement above records the constants and the projective case separately.
  • Restriction to projective X used downstream. Every consumer of this item on the page works with a projective variety X, where also the degree-zero part of the section ring is C.
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Good and geometric quotients for group actions

Definition

Assume AC inherited from the quotient suppliers. Let G be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a classical complex variety X (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules) and let Y be a C-scheme (A locally ringed space). For the scheme, affine and sheaf clauses below, X denotes its associated reduced finite-type complex scheme, obtained by gluing spectra of its affine coordinate rings; the algebraic action is interpreted on that scheme. Its complex closed points recover the classical variety (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties, Classical k-points give closed points over an algebraically closed field). Closed invariant subsets refer to underlying closed subsets with their reduced induced schemes. A morphism π:X→Y of C-schemes, that is, a morphism of locally ringed spaces commuting with the structure morphisms to Spec⁡C (Morphisms of locally ringed spaces), is a good quotient of the action if:

(i) π is G-invariant and surjective;

(ii) π is affine, i.e. π−1(U) is an affine scheme for every affine open U⊆Y;

(iii) for every open U⊆Y the pullback OY(U)→OX(π−1U)G is an isomorphism onto the G-invariant functions;

(iv) for every closed G-stable Z⊆X the image π(Z) is closed in Y; and

(v) for disjoint closed G-stable Z1,Z2⊆X one has π(Z1)∩π(Z2)=∅.

It is a geometric quotient if in addition for every y∈Y(C), the complex points of its fibre π−1(y) form exactly one G(C)-orbit. The fibre condition is stated on complex closed points; it does not identify all scheme points with classical points.

The good-quotient clauses and the single-orbit fibre condition are separate requirements. The projective GIT theorems below establish the good quotient on the semistable locus and guarantee a geometric quotient on the stable locus. A geometric quotient can also occur outside the stable locus, since the single-orbit fibre condition does not require finite stabilizers.

Remarks

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

The invariant section ring and the projective GIT quotient

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the Proj construction. Let G be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety X, let L be an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens), and let R(X,L)=⨁n≥0Γ(X,L⊗n) be its graded section ring (Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring). Write R(X,L)G=⨁n≥0Γ(X,L⊗n)G for the graded subalgebra of G-invariant sections.

The projective GIT quotient of X by G with respect to L is the C-scheme X/ ⁣/LG:=Proj⁡R(X,L)G (Points of Proj of a graded ring, Proj carries a scheme structure), the Proj of the graded invariant subalgebra.

For a homogeneous invariant section f∈Γ(X,L⊗d)G with d≥1 write D+(f)=Spec⁡(R(X,L)G)(f)⊆X/ ⁣/LG for the standard open chart of Proj⁡, and Xf={x∈X:f(x)≠0} for the nonvanishing locus of f.

The construction is recorded together with the given linearization and the ample sheaf L; replacing L by a positive tensor power does not change the Proj (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading).

Remarks

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power

Statement

Assume AC as inherited from the projective and ample-sheaf suppliers. Let G be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety X (projective variety classical), and let L be an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). Then there exist m≥1, a finite-dimensional rational G-module V, and a G-equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves. Moreover i can be taken to be the morphism defined by the complete linear system ∣L⊗m∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex affine algebraic group G acting algebraically on a complex projective variety X, an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf L on X, and the resulting rational G-modules Γ(X,L⊗n).

[F1]

Sections of tensor powers. Each Γ(X,L⊗n) is a rational G-module for the action induced by the linearization, restriction to G-stable opens is equivariant, and the multiplication maps of the section ring R(X,L) are G-equivariant. (Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring)

[F2]

Very ample positive powers. Applied to the proper finite-type morphism X→Spec⁡C over the Noetherian base Spec⁡C and to the ample sheaf L, the very-ampleness theorem supplies m≥1 and a finite family of global sections of L⊗m generating L⊗m whose associated C-morphism X→PCN is a closed immersion with O(1) pulling back to L⊗m. Projectivity gives properness of X over C by Projective morphisms are proper, which also gives properness, hence separatedness, of projective space. (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens)

[F3]

Sections define morphisms. Global sections s0,…,sN generating an invertible sheaf M define a morphism X→PN with φ∗O(1)≅M, φ−1(D+(xi))=Xsi and xj/xi↦sj/si; the assignment is a natural bijection between such morphisms and isomorphism classes of globally generated pairs (M;s0,…,sN). (Generating line-bundle sections define a morphism to projective space, Maps to projective space equal generating line-bundle data, Global generation by the evaluation map)

[F4]

Rational modules and duality. The dual of a finite-dimensional rational G-module is again a rational G-module for the contragredient action, and a morphism into a projective space P(V) is G-equivariant for the action induced by a linear G-action on V exactly when the corresponding sections are acted on compatibly. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)

[F5]

Global sections of a coherent sheaf on a proper field-scheme are finite-dimensional, and a morphism from a proper field-scheme to a separated field-scheme is proper. (Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field, Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3

By [F2] applied to X→Spec⁡C there are m≥1 and global sections s0,…,sN of L⊗m generating L⊗m whose associated morphism is a closed immersion X↪PCN with O(1) pulling back to L⊗m; in particular L⊗m is globally generated and Γ(X,L⊗m)≠0.

2.1F2F3F5step 1.1

Put H=Γ(X,L⊗m), finite-dimensional by projective cohomology finiteness, and V=H∗. The complete-system morphism j:X→P(V) exists by global generation [F3], with j∗O(1)=L⊗m. Let W⊆H be the span of the generating sections used for the closed immersion of step 1.1, discard linear relations, and extend a basis of W to a basis of H. Projection to the W-coordinates is defined on the open U⊆P(V) where those coordinates do not all vanish, and j(X)⊆U. On each standard chart for a generating section in W, the map from the affine chart coordinate ring to the corresponding open of X is surjective already using ratios from W, since the subsystem map is a closed immersion. Adding the other ratios preserves surjectivity, so j is a closed immersion into U. Finally X is projective, hence proper, and P(V) is separated, so j is proper; its image is closed in P(V). Its closed immersion into U therefore is a closed immersion into P(V) as well.

3.1F1F4step 2.1

Equivariance. By [F1] the space Γ(X,L⊗m) is a rational G-module, so its dual V carries the contragredient rational structure by [F4]. The evaluation map Γ(X,L⊗m)⊗COX→L⊗m is G-equivariant: for a section σ, a point x and g∈G one has (g⋅σ)(gx)=g σ(x), because (g⋅σ)(gx)=g σ(g−1gx) by the definition of the action. Hence the morphism defined by the complete linear system intertwines the actions and is G-equivariant for the induced action on P(V). The evaluation quotient also identifies i∗O(1) with L⊗m equivariantly: the fibre of the tautological line at i(x) is the evaluation line in H∗, and dualizing its equivariant inclusion gives exactly the equivariant evaluation quotient H→Lx⊗m. With step 2.1 this gives the required G-equivariant closed immersion with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

The integer m, the finite-dimensional rational module V and the G-equivariant closed immersion i defined by the complete linear system have been produced in steps 2.1 and 3.1, and i∗O(1)≅L⊗m holds by step 2.1.

Remarks

  • No claim for L itself. The lemma embeds X only after passing to the positive power L⊗m; no item of this pair asserts that L itself is very ample or linearizes an embedding, in accordance with the design's warning that no linearization-existence or very-ampleness statement for an arbitrary ample bundle be made.
  • Register. The properness and ampleness clauses are those of the scheme-theoretic suppliers; the classical projective variety X is used through the identification of its closed-point model with the underlying scheme, as elsewhere on this page.
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the quotient suppliers. Let G act on a classical complex variety X, viewed through its associated reduced finite-type complex scheme for scheme clauses, and let π:X→Y be a G-invariant morphism to a C-scheme (Good and geometric quotients for group actions).

(i) If Y=⋃iUi is an open cover such that each restriction π−1(Ui)→Ui is a good quotient of the action of G on π−1(Ui), then π is a good quotient; the analogous statement holds for the geometric-quotient property.

(ii) A good quotient has the categorical universal factorization property for invariant morphisms to classical varieties viewed as their associated schemes. It is a geometric quotient if and only if its fibres on complex closed points are exactly the G(C)-orbits.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex affine algebraic group G acting algebraically on a classical complex variety X, a G-invariant morphism π:X→Y of locally ringed spaces to a C-scheme Y, and an open cover Y=⋃iUi whose restrictions are good quotients.

[F1]

Good and geometric quotients. A good quotient is a G-invariant surjective affine morphism π such that OY(U)→OX(π−1U)G is an isomorphism for all open U⊆Y, images of closed G-stable subsets are closed, and images of disjoint closed G-stable subsets are disjoint (clauses (i)-(v)); it is geometric if in addition its complex-point fibres are exactly the orbits. A categorical quotient is a G-invariant morphism through which every G-invariant morphism to a classical variety factors uniquely. (Good and geometric quotients for group actions, Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties)

[F2]

Classical conventions. Regular functions on a classical variety form a sheaf; a morphism is determined by its local coordinate expressions on affine charts, and two morphisms agreeing on an open cover agree. Invariants of a sheaf of algebras form a sheaf, and surjectivity and invariance are local on the target. Affineness is local on the target by Affineness is local on the target, under AC. (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties, Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules, A locally ringed space)

[F3]

AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the quotient, closed-point-density and maximal-ideal suppliers; in the common-field argument below it supplies a prime of a nonzero tensor product. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F4]

Scheme points and equalizers. In finite-type complex affine schemes closed points are complex points and are dense in every closed subset, including nonreduced schemes; the equalizer of two morphisms into a separated scheme is closed. Affine fibre products have tensor-product coordinate rings. Every nonzero ring has a prime ideal under AC. (In a finite-type algebra over a field, closed points are dense in every closed subset of the spectrum, Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal, Equalizers into separated schemes are closed, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

Clauses (i)-(v) are local on the target. Assume every restriction πi:π−1(Ui)→Ui is a good quotient. Then π is G-invariant because the Ui cover Y and invariance is a local condition on the target, and π is surjective because each πi is. Affineness follows from Affineness is local on the target: refine the Ui by affine opens; their preimages are affine since each πi is affine. For clause (iii), each restriction OY(Ui)→OX(π−1Ui)G is an isomorphism, and for arbitrary open U⊆Y the maps over U∩Ui agree on overlaps because they are determined by restriction of regular functions; since both OY and the invariant-function presheaf are sheaves, the map OY(U)→OX(π−1U)G is an isomorphism. For clause (iv), if Z⊆X is closed and G-stable, then π(Z)∩Ui=πi(Z∩π−1(Ui)) is closed in Ui because Z∩π−1(Ui) is closed and G-stable there; a subset of Y whose traces on all Ui are closed is closed. Clause (v) is checked the same way: π(Z1)∩π(Z2)∩Ui=πi(Z1∩π−1Ui)∩πi(Z2∩π−1Ui)=∅. Hence π is a good quotient.

1.2F1F2

Constancy on complex-point fibres. Let h:X→Z be invariant, with Z the associated separated scheme of a classical variety. If complex points x,x′ have the same image under π but distinct images z,z′ under h, the disjoint closed invariant subsets h−1(z),h−1(z′) have intersecting images under π, contradicting clause (v). Thus h is constant on complex-point fibres. A complex point maps to a closed point of any complex scheme: in each affine open its map to C is surjective with maximal kernel.

2.1F1step 1.1

The geometric property is local. Suppose each restriction is a geometric quotient. A good quotient has orbit fibres exactly when every restriction has orbit fibres, since the fibres of π over Ui are the fibres of πi; by step 1.1 and [F1] this is exactly the geometric-quotient property. Conversely if π is a good quotient with orbit fibres then each restriction is one.

2.2F1F3F4step 1.2

Constancy on all topological fibres. Since X is quasi-compact and π is surjective, Y is quasi-compact. Choose a finite affine cover Vi=Spec⁡Bi of Y. Affineness gives π−1(Vi)=Spec⁡Ai, an affine open of finite-type X, so Ai is a finite-type complex algebra. Therefore R=X×YX is finite type over C: over Vi its ring Ai⊗BiAi is a quotient of Ai⊗CAi. The closed equalizer in R of hpr⁡1,hpr⁡2 contains every complex closed point by step 1.2, hence has underlying set all of R by [F4]. For points x,x′ over y, the tensor product κ(x)⊗κ(y)κ(x′) is nonzero (tensoring field extensions over a field preserves nonzero injections). A prime of it gives a common field-valued point of R dominating x,x′, so the equalizer condition on underlying points forces h(x)=h(x′). Thus h is constant on every topological fibre.

3.1F1F2step 2.2

Open charts and descent. For an affine chart V=Spec⁡A of Z, put U=h−1(V). Constancy on fibres makes U saturated. Consequently W=π(U)=Y∖π(X∖U) is open by clause (iv), and U=π−1(W). Every coordinate in A pulls back to an invariant regular function on U, which descends uniquely to W by clause (iii); these descended functions respect sums, products and all relations because pullback is an isomorphism. They define a morphism W→Spec⁡A by Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections. On overlaps the underlying maps agree by surjectivity of π and the coordinate pullbacks agree by the same sheaf isomorphism, so they glue to φ:Y→Z with φπ=h. The same arguments give uniqueness of both its underlying map and sheaf map. This is the categorical universal property.

4.1F1F4step 2.2step 3.1

Geometric criterion and classical topology. The geometric criterion is precisely the complex-point fibre condition in [F1]. For its relation with the classical convention, the induced map X(C)→Y(C) is surjective: every fibre over a complex point is nonempty by scheme surjectivity and finite type over C by the affine chart description in step 2.2, so [F4] supplies a complex point in it. If U⊆Y(C) has open preimage in X(C) and the fibres are orbits, its complementary preimage is a closed invariant classical subset, hence the complex points of a closed reduced subset C⊆X. Clause (iv) makes π(C) closed in Y, and π(C)∩Y(C)=Y(C)∖U: a fibre of C over a complex point is nonempty precisely when it has a complex point, again by [F4]. Thus U is open in the induced classical topology. The converse follows by continuity, and the invariant-function condition is inherited from clause (iii). When Y is a classical variety through its associated scheme, these are exactly the classical geometric-quotient conditions.

5.1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove locality on the target for the good and geometric properties, step 3.1 proves the categorical universal property of a good quotient, and step 4.1 proves that a good quotient has orbit fibres exactly when it is geometric, which is assertion (ii). The Axiom of Choice is used through the closed-point and maximal-ideal suppliers as recorded in [F3].

Remarks

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Semistable and stable points for a linearization

Definition

Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group (Reductive and linearly reductive complex algebraic groups) acting algebraically on a complex projective variety X (projective variety classical, Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules), and let L be an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety).

A point x∈X is semistable with respect to L if there exist n≥1 and σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n)G with σ(x)≠0. The set of such points is written Xss(L), and its complement Xus(L)=X∖Xss(L) is the unstable locus.

A point x∈Xss(L) is stable with respect to L if its orbit Gx is closed in Xss(L) and its stabilizer Gx is finite. The set of stable points is written Xs(L).

These definitions agree with the embedded definitions for a G-equivariant closed immersion X↪P(V) with L⊗m≅O(1)∣X as G-linearized invertible sheaves: Xss(L)=X∩P(V)ss and Xs(L)=X∩P(V)s, where semistability in P(V) is the nonvanishing of a positive-degree invariant homogeneous form (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set) and stability adds closedness of the orbit in the semistable locus and finiteness of the stabilizer; this equivalence is asserted here and proved in the two main theorems of this page.

By construction Xss(L) and Xs(L) are G-stable subsets of X. The definition itself claims no openness, nonemptiness or finiteness of either locus.

Remarks

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Invariants of a localization at an invariant element

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the Reynolds-operator suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group acting rationally on a commutative C-algebra A by algebra automorphisms, with Reynolds operator RA:A→AG (Complete reducibility and the Reynolds operator for a complex reductive group). Suppose A=⨁n∈ZAn is graded and G acts by graded algebra automorphisms, with RA preserving degrees. Then for every homogeneous f∈AG one has (Af)G=(AG)f compatibly with the grading, and consequently ((Af)0)G=(AG)(f), where (AG)(f)=((AG)f)0 is the degree-zero part of the localization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a rational G-algebra A that is graded with G acting by graded algebra automorphisms, the Reynolds operator RA, and a homogeneous invariant element f∈AG.

[F1]

Reynolds operator. RA:A→AG is G-equivariant, restricts to the identity on AG, is AG-linear and idempotent, and its image is exactly AG; moreover every rational G-module is a direct sum of simple submodules, so every G-stable submodule of a rational G-module has a G-stable complement. (Complete reducibility and the Reynolds operator for a complex reductive group, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring)

[F2]

Rational modules. A rational G-module is one in which every vector lies in a finite-dimensional G-stable subspace on which G acts by a morphism; a G-stable subspace of a rational G-module is again rational, and a direct sum of rational modules is rational. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)

[F3]

Graded conventions. In a graded ring, multiplication by a homogeneous element shifts degrees, so the kernel of multiplication by fk on a graded module is a graded submodule; the localization Af of a graded ring at a homogeneous element carries the induced Z-grading, and the action of G by graded automorphisms on A extends to Af because f is invariant. (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)

[F4]

AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Reynolds-operator and complete-reducibility suppliers and is used only through them. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3algebra

The localized Reynolds operator. Define R~:Af→Af by R~(a/fn)=RA(a)/fn. This is well defined: if a/fn=b/fm, then fk(fma−fnb)=0 in A for some k≥0, and applying the AG-linear operator RA to this relation (with the invariant elements fk+m, fk+n pulled out) gives fk+mRA(a)=fk+nRA(b), so RA(a)/fn=RA(b)/fm in Af. The map R~ is (AG)f-linear: for h∈AG and r≥0, one has h/fr∈(AG)f and R~((h/fr)(a/fn))=RA(ha)/fr+n=(h/fr)R~(a/fn).

1.2F1F2F3F4

The converse inclusion. Let K={b∈A:fkb=0 for some k≥0} be the kernel of the localization map A→Af; it is a G-stable submodule because f is invariant and G acts by automorphisms, and it is a rational G-module as a submodule of the rational module A by [F2]. By complete reducibility there is a G-stable complement C with A=K⊕C; in particular K∩C=0. The complement is supplied by the complete-reducibility theorem, so this step inherits the Axiom of Choice and makes no new selection [F4].

2.1F1step 1.1

Image and fixed points. R~ is idempotent and has image exactly (AG)f: the image is contained in (AG)f because RA(a)∈AG, and an element h/fn with h∈AG is fixed by R~. Consequently (AG)f⊆(Af)G, since (AG)f consists of invariant fractions.

3.1F1step 1.2algebra

Let x∈(Af)G and write x=a/fn with a=k+c, k∈K, c∈C; then x=c/fn. For every g∈G the element gc−c lies in C, while the equality gc/fn=c/fn in Af says precisely that fm(gc−c)=0 for some m, i.e. gc−c∈K. Hence gc−c∈K∩C=0, so gc=c for all g and c∈AG; thus x=c/fn∈(AG)f. With step 2.1 this gives (Af)G=(AG)f.

4.1F3step 3.1algebra

Gradings. The action is by graded automorphisms, so the invariant subspace of a graded rational G-module is graded; both sides of (Af)G=(AG)f are graded submodules of the graded ring Af (the localization of the graded subalgebra AG at the homogeneous element f is graded, and (Af)G is graded). Taking degree-zero parts of the equality gives ((Af)0)G=((AG)f)0=(AG)(f). The hypothesis that RA preserves degrees is what makes the Reynolds projection compatible with the grading in the computation of step 1.1, and the identity above is compatible with the gradings.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 establish (Af)G=(AG)f, and step 4.1 gives the graded consequence ((Af)0)G=(AG)(f), as claimed.

Remarks

  • No domain hypothesis. The proof uses complete reducibility to split off the f-torsion of A; this replaces the clearing-denominators step of the classical treatment and makes the identity valid for an arbitrary graded rational G-algebra, without assuming that A is a domain.
  • Degree preservation. The hypothesis that RA preserves degrees enters only through the compatibility of the invariant identifications with the Z-grading; it holds for the natural graded actions used on this page.
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Nonvanishing charts of sections of an ample linearization are affine

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the embedding suppliers. Let X be a complex projective variety, let L be an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf, and let σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n) be a global section with n≥1. Then the nonvanishing locus Xσ={x∈X:σ(x)≠0} is an affine open subset of X; if σ is G-invariant, then Xσ is G-stable. Consequently the charts Xσ, for σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n)G and n≥1, form an open cover of Xss(L) by affine G-stable subsets. Here, for any complex affine algebraic group G, Xss(L) denotes the union of these invariant nonvanishing loci; for reductive G this agrees with Semistable and stable points for a linearization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex projective variety X with an algebraic action of the complex affine algebraic group G, an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf L on X, a global section σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n), and a G-equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves for some m≥1.

[F1]

Equivariant embedding. There are m≥1, a finite-dimensional rational G-module V and a G-equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves, obtained from the complete linear system ∣L⊗m∣; in particular Γ(X,L⊗mk)≅Γ(X,(L⊗m)⊗k) for every k≥0. (An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power, Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring)

[F2]

Projective charts and high-degree lifting. A closed subscheme of projective space has affine standard charts Y∩D+(F). The ideal sheaf is coherent by Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme and Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward. The sequence 0→IY(k)→OP(V)(k)→i∗OY(k)→0 and Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology make restriction surjective when H1(IY(k))=0, which holds for large k by Serre vanishing. The source space consists of homogeneous degree-k forms by Cohomology of O(d) on projective space (also for P0 and k≥0). No surjectivity in every degree is assumed. (Serre vanishing for coherent sheaves and ample twists, Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals, Standard opens are affine)

[F3]

Nonvanishing loci. For invertible sheaves the nonvanishing locus of a section is open, and intersecting with an affine open gives an affine open; for sections σ,τ one has Xσ⊗τ=Xσ∩Xτ. (A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F3algebra

Fix the equivariant closed immersion of [F1], so that L⊗m≅i∗O(1). For a local trivialization of L in which σ corresponds to a regular function f, the section σ⊗m corresponds to fm; hence σ⊗m and σ have the same nonvanishing locus, Xσ⊗m=Xσ (this is the local computation of the nonvanishing locus, valid for arbitrary sections, not only invariant ones).

1.2F1algebra

If σ is G-invariant, then for every g∈G the equality g⋅σ=σ means σ(gx)=g σ(x) in the fibre of L⊗n at gx; since the fibre map is a C-linear isomorphism, σ(x)=0 if and only if σ(gx)=0. Hence Xσ is G-stable.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1

Under the embedding of step 1.1, σ⊗m is a section of OX(n). For the coherent ideal sheaf IX in P(V), Serre vanishing gives H1(P(V),IX(nq))=0 for sufficiently large q. The ideal-sheaf exact sequence then makes restriction of degree-nq forms onto H0(X,OX(nq)) surjective. Lift σ⊗mq to such a form F. Its nonvanishing locus equals Xσ, since taking a positive power does not change vanishing in a line fibre. Hence Xσ=X∩D+(F), a closed subscheme of the standard affine Proj chart, and is affine. No projective-normality assumption is used.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

Every x∈Xss(L) has, by the invariant-section union specified in the Statement, an invariant section σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n)G with σ(x)≠0, hence lies in the affine G-stable chart Xσ of steps 1.2 and 2.1; the charts therefore cover Xss(L).

Remarks

  • Why the power is needed. The affineness conclusion is obtained through the very ample power L⊗m of [F1]; the section σ itself is replaced by its power, which does not change the nonvanishing locus by step 1.1.
  • No separatedness hypothesis. The argument uses only the closed-immersion presentation of a projective variety and the standard affine charts of projective space.
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The section ring of an ample invertible sheaf is finitely generated

Statement

Assume AC as inherited from the projective and sheaf-cohomology suppliers. Let X be a projective scheme over C and L an ample invertible sheaf on X (Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). Then the section ring R(X,L)=⨁n≥0Γ(X,L⊗n) is a finitely generated graded C-algebra, hence a Noetherian ring.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A projective C-scheme X, an ample invertible sheaf L on X, and the section ring R(X,L).

[F1]

Very ample positive power. Applied to the proper finite-type morphism X→Spec⁡C and the ample sheaf L, the very-ampleness theorem gives an integer m≥1, an integer N≥0 and global sections of L⊗m generating L⊗m whose associated morphism is a closed immersion i:X↪PCN with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m. (High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme, Generating line-bundle sections define a morphism to projective space, Global generation by the evaluation map)

[F2]

Graded sections of a coherent sheaf. For a coherent sheaf F on PCN the graded S-module Γ∗(F)=⨁k≥0Γ(PN,F(k)) has a finitely generated tail: there is k0 with ⨁k≥k0Γ(PN,F(k)) finitely generated over S=C[x0,…,xN]; the extended sheaf i∗G along the closed immersion i is coherent. Each individual space Γ(PN,F(k)) is finite-dimensional over C. (High-degree section module is finite graded, Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field)

[F3]

The coordinate ring image. Let S=C[x0,…,xN] and let A be the homogeneous coordinate ring of the closed immersion i:X↪PN, namely the image of the graded restriction map S→M0=⨁k≥0Γ(X,OX(k)). It is a finitely generated graded C-algebra, being a quotient of S; the restriction maps need not be surjective onto every space of global sections. (Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals)

[F4]

Hilbert basis. A finitely generated algebra over a field is Noetherian. (Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

If X=∅ then R(X,L)=0 is generated by the empty set and is Noetherian; assume henceforth X≠∅. Fix the integer m≥1 and the closed immersion i:X↪PCN of [F1], so that OX(1) in the following denotes i∗OPN(1)≅L⊗m and L⊗(mk+j)≅i∗O(k)⊗L⊗j for all k≥0, 0≤j<m.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The graded modules Mj. For 0≤j<m put Mj=⨁k≥0Γ(X,L⊗(mk+j)). Under the identification of step 1.1 and the projection formula for the finite morphism i, Mj=Γ∗(Fj) for the coherent sheaf Fj=i∗(L⊗j) on PCN; hence by [F2] each Mj has a finitely generated tail over S=C[x0,…,xN]. A graded S-module whose tail is finitely generated is finitely generated: the missing finite initial part is a finite-dimensional C-vector space by [F2], and an extension of a finitely generated module by a finite-dimensional one is finitely generated. So each Mj is a finitely generated graded S-module.

3.1F2F3step 2.1algebra

The section modules over the coordinate ring image. Let A⊆M0 be the image in [F3]. It is a finitely generated C-algebra. For p∈S in the kernel of S→A, its restriction is the zero section on X, so multiplication by p is zero on every Γ(X,L⊗(mk+j)); hence the S-action on each Mj factors through A. The finite S-module generators of step 2.1 therefore also generate Mj as an A-module. In particular M0 and each of the finitely many Mj are finite A-modules.

4.1F3F4step 3.1algebra∎

Conclusion. The decomposition R(X,L)=⨁j=0m−1Mj and step 3.1 show that R(X,L) is a finite module over the finitely generated C-algebra A. A finite set of algebra generators of A together with a finite set of A-module generators of R(X,L) generates R(X,L) as a C-algebra. Hence R(X,L) is a finitely generated C-algebra, and it is Noetherian by [F4].

Remarks

  • The proof uses only the ample power. Neither the very-ampleness of L itself nor a Hilbert--Mumford criterion is used; the finite generation comes from the graded-module theorem on projective space applied to the coherent sheaves i∗(L⊗j).
  • No separatedness issue. X is a projective C-scheme, in particular proper and of finite type over Spec⁡C; all cited suppliers are stated in that register.
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group and let A=⨁n≥0An be a finitely generated graded commutative C-algebra with A0=C, equipped with a rational action of G by graded algebra automorphisms (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules). Then the graded invariant subalgebra AG=⨁n≥0AnG is a finitely generated C-algebra.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a finitely generated graded C-algebra A with A0=C and a rational action of G on A by graded algebra automorphisms.

[F1]

Local finiteness. Every element of a rational G-module lies in a finite-dimensional G-stable subspace on which G acts by a morphism; sums of finitely many such subspaces are again finite-dimensional and G-stable. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)

[F2]

Finite homogeneous generation. There are finitely many homogeneous elements a1,…,ar generating A as a C-algebra, with ai∈Adi, di≥1 because A0=C; the invariant subalgebra is graded, AG=⨁nAnG. (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)

[F3]

Surjectivity of invariants. If φ:B→A is a surjective G-equivariant homomorphism of rational G-algebras, then φ(BG)=AG; the conclusion holds also for the graded subalgebra of invariants. (The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring (c), (d))

[F4]

Invariants of a finite-dimensional module. For a finite-dimensional rational G-module W the invariant algebra C[W∗]G is a finitely generated C-algebra, and C[W∗]=Sym⁡(W) as a graded algebra. (Invariants of a finite-dimensional module are finitely generated)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2algebra

A finite-dimensional generating module. By [F2] choose homogeneous generators a1,…,ar of A. By [F1] each ai lies in a finite-dimensional G-stable subspace Wi; since A=⨁nAn and the action is graded, the homogeneous components of the elements of Wi span a finite-dimensional graded G-stable space containing ai, so we may take each Wi graded. Then W=W1+⋯+Wr is a finite-dimensional graded G-stable subspace of A whose elements contain the generators ai, hence generate A as a C-algebra.

2.1F4step 1.1construct

The symmetric algebra surjection. The universal property of the symmetric algebra of the finite-dimensional graded vector space W gives a graded C-algebra surjection φ:Sym⁡(W)→A sending W identically onto its image in A; it is G-equivariant because W is G-stable and the identification Sym⁡(W)=C[W∗] carries the induced action to the action on polynomial functions.

3.1F3F4step 2.1

By [F3] the induced map on invariants Sym⁡(W)G→AG is surjective, and Sym⁡(W)G=C[W∗]G is a finitely generated C-algebra by [F4].

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

A quotient of a finitely generated C-algebra is finitely generated, so AG is finitely generated, as claimed; the argument is the graded form of Nagata's theorem used by Brion and Hoskins.

Remarks

  • Noetherianity of A. The hypothesis that A is finitely generated over C is what makes A Noetherian and the quotient argument in step 3.1 available; no Hilbert-basis input beyond finite generation is used.
  • Gradings. The proof keeps the Z≥0-grading throughout: the generators are homogeneous, the module W is chosen graded, and the surjection of step 2.1 is a graded map, so the finite generating set produced for AG consists of homogeneous invariants.
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group, V a finite-dimensional rational G-module, X⊆P(V) a G-stable closed projective algebraic set with homogeneous coordinate ring R=R(X)=C[V]/I(X~) (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and let f∈RG be homogeneous of positive degree. Then:

(i) the nonvanishing locus Xf⊆X is affine and G-stable; (ii) O(Xf)G=(RG)(f), the degree-zero part of the localization of the invariant ring; (iii) the affine quotient morphism πf:Xf→D+(f)=Spec⁡(RG)(f) corresponding to the inclusion O(Xf)G⊆O(Xf) is a good quotient of the G-action on Xf (Good and geometric quotients for group actions), with πf−1(D+(f))=Xf; (iv) the morphisms πf for varying f are compatible on overlaps D+(fg)=D+(f)∩D+(g), in the sense that πf and πg both restrict to the affine quotient of Xfg.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a finite-dimensional rational G-module V, a G-stable closed projective algebraic set X⊆P(V) with homogeneous coordinate ring R=C[V]/I and homogeneous invariant f∈RG of positive degree d≥1.

[F1]

Charts are affine and stable. For the homogeneous coordinate ring R, Xf is the affine Proj chart of [F2], even when X is reducible. Invariance of f makes its zero locus G-stable: f(gv)=f(v) for lifts v in the affine cone. Thus Xf is G-stable.

[F2]

Sections of the basic opens. On the chart D+(f)=Spec⁡R(f) of Proj⁡R one has Γ(D+(f),M~)=M(f) for every graded R-module M, naturally in f and M; for M=R this identifies O(Xf)=R(f), and Xf is the affine chart of X with coordinate ring R(f). (Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open, Associated sheaf of a graded module on Proj, Standard opens are affine)

[F3]

Invariants of a localization. R is a graded rational G-algebra with G acting by graded algebra automorphisms and with Reynolds operator RR preserving degrees (naturality of the Reynolds operator applied to the graded pieces); hence (Rf)G=(RG)f compatibly with the grading and ((Rf)0)G=(RG)(f). (Invariants of a localization at an invariant element, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring)

[F4]

Finite generation. RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra by Nagata's theorem; moreover for a finitely generated graded C-algebra A=⨁An with A0=C and a homogeneous element h of positive degree, the degree-zero part A(h) of the localization is a finitely generated C-algebra. Finite generation of RG is Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated; the degree-zero localization assertion is proved directly in step 1.2.

[F5]

The affine quotient and Reynolds splitting. The classical affine invariant-theory theorem gives the categorical quotient and the closed-point orbit conclusions. For any rational algebra C, its Reynolds operator is a CG-linear retraction C→CG, natural under equivariant maps, so it preserves invariant ideals; quotient maps are surjective on invariants. Tensor products compute affine scheme fibres, and every nonzero algebra has a prime ideal under AC. These facts give the scheme good-quotient clauses explicitly below, without identifying complex closed points with all primes. (Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring, Complete reducibility and the Reynolds operator for a complex reductive group, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)

[F6]

AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers and is not used directly here. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

Affineness and stability. If X=∅, its homogeneous coordinate ring is zero, the invariant ring and every localized chart ring are zero, both loci and every quotient target are empty, and all conclusions hold with the empty morphisms. Assume henceforth X≠∅. The sheaf O(1)∣X is ample and linearized, and f is an invariant global section of O(d)∣X (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and [F2] identifies Xf with the affine chart D+(f) of Proj⁡R. Its G-stability follows from [F1].

1.2F4algebra

Finite generation of the invariant ring of the chart. RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with (RG)0=C by [F4], so (RG)(f) is a finitely generated C-algebra by the second part of [F4]: indeed, if RG=C[u1,…,ur] with ui homogeneous of degrees ei and d=deg⁡f, then (RG)(f) is generated by the finitely many elements uid/fei together with the elements (∏iuiεi)/fl for all exponent vectors 0≤εi<d with ∑εiei=dl, because every monomial ∏uiai of degree divisible by d splits as ∏i(uid)qi⋅∏iuiεi with εi<d and the remainder of degree divisible by d.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

The invariant coordinate ring of the chart. By [F2] the chart D+(f) of Proj⁡R has coordinate ring R(f), and the affine chart Xf has coordinate ring O(Xf)=R(f). By [F3] applied to the graded rational G-algebra R and the homogeneous invariant f, (R(f))G=((Rf)0)G=(RG)(f); this proves (ii).

3.1F5step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

The chart quotient is a scheme good quotient. Put C=O(Xf) and B=CG=(RG)(f) by step 2.1. The affine scheme morphism πf:Spec⁡C→Spec⁡B=D+(f) is invariant and affine. It is surjective at every scheme point: the B-linear Reynolds retraction splits B↪C, so for every prime p⊂B tensoring gives an injection κ(p)↪C⊗Bκ(p). This nonzero fibre algebra has a prime by [F5]. On each principal target open D(b), the rational-localized Reynolds computation gives (Cb)G=Bb, so the sheaf clause holds on a basis and hence on all opens. For a closed invariant subset with radical stable ideal I⊂C, invariant exactness gives (C/I)G=B/(I∩B). Applying the same Reynolds-splitting fibre argument to C/I shows its image is exactly the scheme closed subset V(I∩B). If two such subsets are disjoint, their ideals satisfy I+J=C; write 1=a+b, apply Reynolds, and use preservation of stable ideals to obtain 1∈(I∩B)+(J∩B), so their scheme images are disjoint. These are all good-quotient clauses, proving (iii); the target is D+(f), so πf−1(D+(f))=Xf.

4.1F2F6step 2.1step 3.1∎

Compatibility. For invariant homogeneous f,g of positive degrees the charts satisfy D+(fg)=D+(f)∩D+(g) and Xfg=Xf∩Xg, and localizing the identifications of step 2.1 at h=gdeg⁡f/fdeg⁡g gives O(Xfg)=(O(Xf))h with invariant ring ((RG)(f))h=(RG)(fg); both πf and πg restrict on Xfg to the affine quotient morphism with target Spec⁡(RG)(fg)=D+(fg), because the corresponding ring maps are the canonical localizations of O(Xf)G→O(Xf) and of O(Xg)G→O(Xg) at the same localization. This is assertion (iv) and completes the proof; no new choice is made, the Axiom of Choice being inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers [F6].

Remarks

  • Degrees in the overlap. The identification on the overlap is functoriality of localization: the chart ring R(fg) is the localization of R(f) at gdeg⁡f/fdeg⁡g, and likewise for the invariant rings, so no choice of isomorphism is involved.
  • Finite generation of the chart. Step 1.2 proves this by a finite list of monomial fractions; it does not apply the positively graded finite-generation lemma to a degree-zero localization.
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Projective GIT quotient for a linear action

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the affine invariant-theory and quotient suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group, V a finite-dimensional rational G-module, X⊆P(V) a G-stable closed projective algebraic set, R=R(X) its homogeneous coordinate ring (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and L=O(1)∣X. Put Xss=X∖V+(R+G)={x∈X:∃f∈R>0G, f(x)≠0} and Xs={x∈Xss:Gx is closed in Xss and Gx is finite} (Semistable and stable points for a linearization). Then:

(i) RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with (RG)0=C when X≠∅ (and RG=0 when X=∅), and Y:=Proj⁡RG is a projective C-scheme of finite type;

(ii) Xss and Xs are open G-stable subsets of X, and Xss is the union of the affine G-stable charts Xf for f∈R>0G;

(iii) the chart morphisms of Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action glue to a G-invariant morphism π:Xss→Y that is a good quotient in the sense of Good and geometric quotients for group actions; π is surjective, OY≅(π∗OXss)G, and for x1,x2∈Xss one has π(x1)=π(x2) if and only if Gx1‾∩Gx2‾∩Xss≠∅;

(iv) Ys:=π(Xs) is open in Y, Xs=π−1(Ys), and π:Xs→Ys is a geometric quotient; a point x∈Xss is stable if and only if Gx is finite and Gx is closed in Xss, equivalently if and only if Gx is finite and x lies in a chart Xf, f∈R>0G, in which all G-orbits are closed; and if Xs=Xss then π is a geometric quotient of Xss.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a finite-dimensional rational G-module V, a G-stable closed projective algebraic set X⊆P(V) with homogeneous coordinate ring R and invariant part RG, and L=O(1)∣X.

[F1]

Finite generation of invariants. For X≠∅, R is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with R0=C and finite-dimensional graded pieces, and the action of G is rational by graded algebra automorphisms; hence RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with (RG)0=C. (Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated, homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set)

[F2]

Projectivity of the Proj. A finitely generated graded C-algebra A with A0=C and finite-dimensional graded pieces has Proj⁡A a projective C-scheme of finite type; in particular Y=Proj⁡RG is projective of finite type. (Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective)

[F3]

The affine chart quotients. For every homogeneous f∈RG of positive degree the chart Xf is affine and G-stable with O(Xf)G=(RG)(f), and the affine quotient morphism πf:Xf→D+(f)=Spec⁡(RG)(f) is a good quotient; the various πf agree on overlaps. (Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action, Nonvanishing charts of sections of an ample linearization are affine)

[F4]

Locality and the affine picture. Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical; a good quotient is geometric exactly when its fibres are the orbits. Every fibre of the affine categorical quotient of an affine G-variety contains a unique closed orbit, for an affine G-variety the stable locus (closed orbit and finite stabilizer) is characterized by the affine stable-locus theorem, with geometric quotient onto its image, and a closed subgroup of the finite-type group G is finite exactly when its dimension is zero. (Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients, The stable locus has a geometric quotient, Stable points of an affine action, Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient)

[F5]

Orbit and stabilizer behaviour. The function x↦dim⁡Gx is upper semicontinuous and x↦dim⁡Gx is lower semicontinuous; for every point one has dim⁡G=dim⁡Gx+dim⁡Gx, the orbit closure Gx‾ is the union of Gx and of orbits of strictly smaller dimension, every orbit closure contains a closed orbit, and every orbit of minimal dimension in a G-stable closed set is closed. (Semicontinuity of stabilizer and orbit dimension, Orbit dimension and closed orbits for complex group actions, Global and local dimension of classical varieties)

[F6]

Good-quotient clauses. A good quotient π:X→Y is G-invariant and surjective, satisfies OY≅(π∗OX)G, maps closed G-stable subsets to closed subsets and disjoint closed G-stable subsets to disjoint subsets, and is categorical; a geometric quotient has the G-orbits as its fibres, with the quotient topology and sheaf conditions. (Good and geometric quotients for group actions, Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties)

[F7]

Separate a point from a disjoint invariant closed subset. For an affine reductive-group action with categorical quotient π, if Z is closed and invariant and π(x)∉π(Z), there is an invariant regular function h with h(x)≠0 and h∣Z=0 (Invariants separate a stable point from a disjoint closed invariant subset).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

The invariant ring and the target. If X=∅, its homogeneous coordinate ring is zero, the invariant ring and every localized chart ring are zero, both loci and every quotient target are empty, and all conclusions hold with the empty morphisms. Assume henceforth X≠∅. By [F1] RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with (RG)0=C and finite-dimensional graded pieces; by [F2] the scheme Y=Proj⁡RG is projective of finite type over C. This is assertion (i).

1.2F3given

The semistable locus. By definition x∈Xss exactly when f(x)≠0 for some homogeneous invariant f of positive degree, i.e. exactly when x lies in one of the charts Xf with f∈R>0G; each such chart is open, affine and G-stable by [F3], so Xss is open and G-stable and covered by the charts Xf.

2.1F3F4F6step 1.2

Gluing the chart morphisms. The chart morphisms πf:Xf→D+(f) of [F3] agree on overlaps Xfg by the compatibility assertion of [F3]; since the D+(f) with f∈R>0G cover Y and the Xf cover Xss, they glue to a G-invariant morphism π:Xss→Y whose restrictions are the good quotients πf. For any positive-degree invariants f,g, the function fdeg⁡g/gdeg⁡f on Xg is the pullback of the same fraction on D+(g); it is nonzero precisely on Xf∩Xg and on D+(f)∩D+(g), respectively. Thus π−1(D+(f))=Xf, since the Xg cover Xss, so the chart maps really are target restrictions of π. By [F4] the good-quotient property is local on the target, so π is a good quotient; in particular by [F6] it is surjective, its pullback identifies OY with (π∗OXss)G, and images of closed G-stable (respectively disjoint closed G-stable) subsets are closed (respectively disjoint).

2.2givenstep 1.2

Closed charts and invariant vanishing. Call a chart Xf, f∈R>0G, closed if every G-orbit contained in Xf is closed in Xf, and let Xc be the union of the closed charts; this is an open G-stable subset of Xss. If Xf is closed and g∈R>0G, then Xfg=Xf∩Xg is an open G-stable subset of Xf, so every orbit contained in Xfg is closed in Xfg as well. For a homogeneous invariant section F, if F(x)=0 then its closed zero locus is G-stable and contains Gx, hence also contains every z∈Gx‾∩Xss. Equivalently, if such a z lies in a chart Xf and F=f, then F(x)≠0, so x∈Xf.

2.3F3F4F5F7step 1.2

The stable locus lies in the closed charts. Let x∈Xs and choose f0∈R>0G with x∈Xf0 (step 1.2). The set Z={y∈Xf0:dim⁡Gy>0} is closed and G-stable in Xf0 by [F5] and is disjoint from the closed orbit Gx, whose stabilizers are conjugate to the finite group Gx. Since Gx and Z are disjoint closed G-stable subsets of the affine chart, the good-quotient property [F4] gives πf0(Gx)∩πf0(Z)=∅. Thus πf0(x)∉πf0(Z), and the affine quotient separation lemma [F7] gives h∈O(Xf0)G with h(x)≠0 and h∣Z=0. By [F3] write h=g/f0m with g∈RG homogeneous. Choose N≥1 and put F=gf0N; then F is homogeneous invariant of positive degree and F(x)≠0. Its chart satisfies XF⊆Xf0, and if y∈XF then h(y)=g(y)/f0(y)m≠0, so y∉Z; hence every point of XF has finite stabilizer. If an orbit Gy⊆XF were not closed in XF, its boundary in XF would contain a point z∈XF∩Gy‾∖Gy; by [F5] the orbit Gz has dimension strictly smaller than dim⁡Gy. But every point of XF has finite stabilizer, so every orbit in XF has dimension dim⁡G by the orbit-stabilizer formula [F5], a contradiction. Thus XF is a closed chart containing x. Every stable point lies in such a chart, so Xs⊆Xc.

3.1F5step 2.1step 2.3

Points of closed charts with finite stabilizer are stable. Let x∈Xc with Gx finite and choose a closed chart Xf containing x. The fibre π−1(π(x)) is closed in Xss and contains Gx, so it contains Gx‾∩Xss. Since π(x)∈D+(f) and Xf=π−1(D+(f)) by step 2.1, the fibre lies in Xf. Thus every z∈Gx‾∩Xss lies in the closure of Gx computed in Xf, and closedness of the orbit in that chart forces z∈Gx. Hence Gx is closed in Xss and x∈Xs. With step 2.3 this gives Xs=Xc∩{x∈X:dim⁡Gx=0}.

3.2F4step 2.1step 2.2

Fibres of π. Let x1,x2∈Xss. If π(x1)=π(x2), choose f∈R>0G with π(x1)∈D+(f); then x1,x2∈Xf and, since πf restricts π by step 2.1, πf(x1)=πf(x2), so the closures of Gx1 and Gx2 in Xf meet by the unique-closed-orbit property of the affine fibre ([F4]), hence their closures in Xss meet. Conversely let z∈Gx1‾∩Gx2‾∩Xss and choose f∈R>0G with z∈Xf; by the vanishing observation of step 2.2 the points x1,x2 also lie in Xf, and z lies in both closures computed in Xf, so πf(x1)=πf(z)=πf(x2) by continuity and π(x1)=π(x2). This proves (iii).

4.1F3F4F5F6step 2.3step 3.1

Openness and the geometric quotient. By step 3.1 the stable locus is Xs=Xc∩{x∈X:dim⁡Gx=0}. The union Xc of charts is open and G-stable, and {x:dim⁡Gx=0} is open in Xc by upper semicontinuity of x↦dim⁡Gx ([F5]); hence Xs is open in X, and it is G-stable because stabilizers of points in one orbit are conjugate. On a closed chart Xf the affine quotient πf of [F3] is a good quotient whose fibres contain a unique closed orbit ([F4]); since every orbit in Xf is closed, each fibre is a single orbit, so πf is a geometric quotient. These geometric quotients agree on overlaps by [F3], so by locality of the geometric-quotient property ([F4]) they glue to a geometric quotient πc:Xc→Yc:=π(Xc), where Yc is the union of the open sets D+(f) over the closed charts, hence open in Y. The closed G-stable subset Xc∖Xs is mapped by the quotient πc to a closed subset of Yc by clause (iv) of [F6], so Ys:=π(Xs)=Yc∖π(Xc∖Xs) is open in Yc and hence in Y; and Xs=π−1(Ys) because the fibres of πc are the orbits and Xs is G-stable. The restriction of the geometric quotient πc to the open G-stable subset Xs is again a geometric quotient onto Ys by locality, so π:Xs→Ys is a geometric quotient. This proves (iv); if Xs=Xss then Xc=Xss and the same argument shows that π is a geometric quotient of Xss.

5.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1∎

Assertions (i)-(iv) are established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii) in step 1.2, (iii) in steps 2.1 and 3.2, and (iv) in steps 2.3, 3.1 and 4.1.

Remarks

  • No Hilbert--Mumford criterion. Semistability and stability are read off from invariant sections and orbit closures only; no numerical criterion is stated or used.
  • The linearization is a hypothesis. The action on R and hence the quotient come from the linearized structure of O(1)∣X; no item constructs a linearization of an arbitrary ample sheaf.
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory, Proj and ample-sheaf suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety X (projective variety classical), and let L be an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens). Let R(X,L)=⨁n≥0Γ(X,L⊗n) and let R(X,L)G be its graded invariant subalgebra. Then:

(i) R(X,L)G is a finitely generated graded C-algebra and the GIT quotient Y=X/ ⁣/LG=Proj⁡R(X,L)G is a projective C-scheme of finite type;

(ii) the semistable locus Xss(L) (Semistable and stable points for a linearization) is the union of the affine G-stable charts Xσ over σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n)G, n≥1, and is open in X; for every m≥1 one has Xss(L)=Xss(L⊗m) and Xs(L)=Xs(L⊗m), and the Veronese isomorphism Proj⁡R(X,L)G≅Proj⁡R(X,L⊗m)G identifies the two quotient data;

(iii) the chart morphisms glue to a G-invariant morphism π:Xss(L)→Y that is a good quotient in the sense of Good and geometric quotients for group actions; in particular OY≅(π∗OXss(L))G, π is surjective, closed G-stable subsets have closed images, and disjoint closed G-stable subsets have disjoint images;

(iv) if m≥1 and i:X↪P(V) is a G-equivariant closed immersion with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves (An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power), then Xss(L)=X∩P(V)ss and Xs(L)=X∩P(V)s for the linear action, so the definitions of Semistable and stable points for a linearization agree with the embedded ones;

(v) no linearization of an arbitrary ample invertible sheaf is constructed or assumed possible, and no Hilbert--Mumford criterion is used or claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a complex projective variety X with an algebraic action, an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf L, its section ring R=R(X,L) and invariant part RG, and an equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves when one is chosen.

[F1]

Finite generation. The section ring R(X,L) is a finitely generated graded C-algebra, its invariant subalgebra RG is finitely generated, and Proj⁡RG is projective of finite type over C (The section ring of an ample invertible sheaf is finitely generated, Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated, Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective).

[F2]

Equivariant very ample power. Some positive power of L gives a G-equivariant closed immersion into a projective space of a finite-dimensional rational G-module, via its complete linear system (An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power).

[F3]

Linear-action GIT theorem. For a G-stable closed X′⊆P(V), the linear-action theorem gives its semistable/stable loci, the good quotient from the invariant coordinate ring, the orbit-closure description of quotient fibres, and the geometric quotient on the stable locus (Projective GIT quotient for a linear action).

[F4]

Coordinate charts. For a homogeneous coordinate ring A of a projective embedding and a homogeneous section f∈A+, the chart Xf is affine with coordinate ring A(f); the chart construction is compatible with localization (homogeneous coordinate ring, Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action).

[F5]

Finite section modules over the coordinate ring. Put S=C[V]=Sym⁡(V∗), let A be the image of S in the section ring of L⊗m, and for 0≤j<m put Mj=⨁k≥0Γ(X,L⊗(mk+j)). The graded section-module theorem gives a finitely generated tail of each Mj over S; the finitely many initial graded pieces are finite-dimensional by projective coherent cohomology, so each full Mj is finite over S. The kernel of S→A acts by zero on every Mj, so R(X,L)=⨁j=0m−1Mj is a finite A-module (High-degree section module is finite graded, Finite-dimensional coherent cohomology over a field). For b∈R, the module R is faithful over A[b] because an element annihilating it annihilates 1; Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element therefore makes b integral over A.

[F6]

Extension from a section chart. If f is a positive-degree section and h∈Γ(Xf,OX), then after multiplying by a power of f the function extends to a global section of the corresponding power of L; hence Γ(Xf,OX)=R(X,L)(f) (Extend a quasi-coherent section after multiplying by a power).

[F7]

Reynolds operator and localization. For a rational G-algebra, the Reynolds operator is natural under equivariant maps, is linear over invariant elements, preserves a G-stable grading, and invariants commute with localization at a homogeneous invariant (The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring, Invariants of a localization at an invariant element).

[F8]

Good quotients. Good quotients are local on the target; the affine chart quotients in [F4] glue to the section-ring quotient, and the good quotient clauses include the invariant structure sheaf and closed/disjoint image properties (Good quotients are local on the target and are categorical quotients, Good and geometric quotients for group actions).

[F9]

Proj and Veronese. Standard homogeneous opens cover Proj; for a graded ring, passing to a positive Veronese gives a canonical Proj isomorphism with matching localized degree-zero rings (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

Finite generation and projectivity. By F1 the invariant section ring RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with degree-zero part C, so Y=Proj⁡RG is projective of finite type. This proves (i).

1.2F2given

Choose an embedded model. Fix any equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves, whose existence is F2. Let X′=i(X), S=C[V]=Sym⁡(V∗), and let A⊆R(X,L⊗m) be the homogeneous coordinate ring, the image of the restriction map S→R(X,L⊗m).

1.3F5algebra

The full section ring is finite over A. For 0≤j<m, the graded module Mj=⨁k≥0Γ(X,L⊗(mk+j)) is the section module of the coherent sheaf i∗L⊗j on P(V), so it is finite over S by F5. If a homogeneous polynomial in S restricts to zero on X, then it acts by zero on each Mj, since multiplication by it is restriction followed by multiplication of sections. Thus the S-actions on the Mj factor through A, each Mj is a finite A-module, and R=⨁j=0m−1Mj is a finite A-module. By the faithful-module criterion in F5 every homogeneous σ∈R is integral over A.

2.1F3F7step 1.3

Invariant sections give invariant coordinate charts. Let σ∈RnG be homogeneous of positive degree. Since it is integral over A, it satisfies a monic relation over A; taking the homogeneous component of total degree rn gives a relation σr+∑i=1raiσr−i=0 with ai∈A∩Rin (zero when m∤in). Apply the Reynolds operator of R to this relation. Its naturality under multiplication by the invariant σ and under the inclusion A↪R gives σr+∑i=1rRA(ai)σr−i=0, where RA(ai)∈AG∩Rin by F7. If σ(x)≠0 at x∈X, not all RA(ai) can vanish at x, since evaluating the displayed relation in the one-dimensional fiber of L⊗rn would otherwise give σ(x)r=0. Hence every point semistable for the full section ring lies in a nonvanishing chart of a positive-degree invariant in AG. The reverse inclusion is immediate from AG⊆RG, so the embedded semistable locus X′ss equals Xss(L). The same monic relation shows that the charts D+(f) with f∈A+G cover Proj⁡RG: for any homogeneous prime avoiding R+G, choose σ∈R+G outside it; some coefficient RA(ai) in its relation must also be outside the prime.

3.1F4F6F7step 2.1

Identify the two quotient targets chartwise. For f∈A+G, the affine chart Xf has ring A(f) by F4. Fractions in R(f) are regular on Xf, and F6 shows that every regular function there is such a fraction, so A(f)=Γ(Xf,OX)=R(f) as G-algebras. Taking invariants and using F7 gives (AG)(f)=(RG)(f). The D+(f) for f∈A+G cover both Proj⁡AG and Y=Proj⁡RG by step 2.1; these identical chart rings and their localization maps therefore glue to a canonical isomorphism θ:Proj⁡AG→∼Y. On every chart the quotient morphisms from Xf are induced by the same inclusion of invariant regular functions into Γ(Xf,OX), so θ identifies the linear-action quotient with the section-ring quotient.

3.2F3F7F9step 2.1

Compare positive tensor powers and embedded data. For r≥1, the r-th Veronese of RG is R(X,L⊗r)G, so F9 identifies the Proj quotient data for L and L⊗r. The nonvanishing locus of a section equals that of every positive tensor power, so the semistable loci coincide; closedness of orbits in that same locus and finiteness of stabilizers then give equality of the stable loci. For the fixed compatible embedding in step 1.2, step 2.1 proves that the definitions on X′=i(X) agree with those from the full section ring. Moreover the equivariant surjection S→A induces a surjection SG→AG by F7; hence invariant forms on X′ lift to invariant forms on P(V), giving X′ss=X′∩P(V)ss. The orbit closure of a point of X′ in the ambient semistable locus stays in X′, because X′ is closed and invariant; closedness there is therefore equivalent to closedness in X′ss, and stabilizers agree. Thus X′s=X′∩P(V)s. This proves (iv) and all Veronese claims.

4.1F3F8step 2.1step 3.1

Transport GIT properties. The linear-action theorem F3 applies to X′⊆P(V). By steps 2.1 and 3.1 its semistable set, quotient target, and quotient morphism identify with Xss(L), Y, and π respectively. Thus the section-ring morphism is a good quotient with the orbit-closure description of its fibres, proving (iii); the linear theorem also gives openness and G-stability of both loci, the stable geometric quotient, and the invariant-chart criterion. Since stability is defined by finite stabilizer and closed orbit inside the same identified semistable set, its locus agrees with X′s, proving (ii) and the stable-locus assertions in (iv). All these constructions use the given linearization and the cited orbit/quotient results; they construct no linearization and use no Hilbert--Mumford criterion, proving (v).

5.1F1F2F3F7F8F9step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2∎

Assertions (i)-(v) are established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii)-(iv) in steps 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2, and (v) in step 4.1. The proof uses only the given linearization and the orbit/quotient suppliers; it constructs no linearization and invokes no numerical criterion.

Remarks

  • The repair of the Veronese step. The projectivity of Y uses Proj of a finitely generated graded algebra is projective in its corrected form, for the particular common multiple d=kL supplied there; the equality of the loci under every positive power m is proved separately and does not use generation in degree one of an arbitrary Veronese.
  • No linearization existence. The result assumes the linearization of L.
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Good and geometric quotient on the stable locus

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the named suppliers. In the setting of The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring let Xs(L)={x∈Xss(L):Gx is closed in Xss(L), Gx is finite}, and let π:Xss(L)→Y=Proj⁡R(X,L)G be the good quotient. Then:

(i) Xs(L) is open and G-stable in X, Ys:=π(Xs(L)) is open in Y, and Xs(L)=π−1(Ys);

(ii) π:Xs(L)→Ys is a geometric quotient: its fibres are exactly the G-orbits in Xs(L), and OYs≅(π∗OXs(L))G;

(iii) for every m≥1 the identification Xss(L)=Xss(L⊗m) carries Xs(L) onto Xs(L⊗m), and the two geometric quotients are identified by the Veronese isomorphism;

(iv) the stable locus admits the invariant-chart description: x∈Xs(L) if and only if Gx is finite and there exist m≥1 and σ∈Γ(X,L⊗m)G with σ(x)≠0 and the action of G on the affine chart Xσ having all orbits closed;

(v) if Xs(L)=Xss(L) then π itself is a geometric quotient of Xss(L).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The setting of the projective GIT theorem: a complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a complex projective variety X, an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf L, the good quotient π:Xss(L)→Y=Proj⁡R(X,L)G, and the locally closed stable locus Xs(L).

[F1]

Linear case. For a linear action of G on a G-stable closed X′⊆P(V): R(X′)G is a finitely generated graded C-algebra, X′ss and X′s are open G-stable subsets, the chart morphisms glue to a good quotient π′:X′ss→Y′=Proj⁡R(X′)G, the set Y′s=π′(X′s) is open with X′s=π′−1(Y′s), the restriction π′:X′s→Y′s is a geometric quotient with orbit fibres and OY′s≅(π∗′OX′s)G, a point of X′ss is stable if and only if it has finite stabilizer and lies in a chart XF′ in which all G-orbits are closed, equivalently if and only if it has finite stabilizer and closed orbit in X′ss, and X′s=X′ss implies that π′ is a geometric quotient of X′ss. (Projective GIT quotient for a linear action)

[F2]

Ample case and Veronese. Let L be an ample G-linearized invertible sheaf with R(X,L) its section ring and π:Xss(L)→Y=Proj⁡R(X,L)G the good quotient; for every m≥1 one has Xss(L)=Xss(L⊗m) and Xs(L)=Xs(L⊗m), the Veronese isomorphism identifies the quotient data, and for a G-equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves one has Xss(L)=i−1(X′ss) and Xs(L)=i−1(X′s) for X′=i(X) with its linear action. (The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring, Semistable and stable points for a linearization, An ample linearization embeds equivariantly after a positive power, Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading)

[F3]

Transfer of coordinate charts. If F∈R(X′)kG is a homogeneous invariant in the embedded homogeneous coordinate ring, its restriction is an invariant section σ=i∗F∈Γ(X,L⊗mk)G and i(Xσ)=XF′. Conversely every invariant homogeneous coordinate-ring element has an invariant polynomial lift by naturality of the Reynolds operator under the surjection from the polynomial ring. Since i is a G-equivariant isomorphism onto X′, corresponding points have the same stabilizer and orbit closedness on these matching charts agrees. This fact concerns sections coming from the embedded coordinate ring; arbitrary global sections need not arise this way. (Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring)

[F4]

AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the linear-action and quotient suppliers and is used only through them. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F5]

Saturation of a section chart. For a positive-degree invariant section σ∈RnG and any positive-degree invariant section f∈RdG defining an overlapping chart, the degree-zero function σd/fn on Xf pulls back from the Proj chart. Therefore, on Xf, its value is nonzero exactly where σ is nonzero. Since the charts Xf cover Xss(L), the chart quotient has target D+(σ) and Xσ=π−1(D+(σ)). (The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring, Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2

The equivariant embedding and the reduction. Choose m≥1 and a G-equivariant closed immersion i:X↪P(V) with i∗O(1)≅L⊗m as G-linearized invertible sheaves ([F2]); put X′=i(X) and R′=R(X′). By [F2] the isomorphism i identifies Xss(L) with X′ss and Xs(L) with X′s; the Veronese isomorphism identifies Proj⁡R(X,L)G with Proj⁡R(X,L⊗m)G. The latter full section ring need not equal the homogeneous coordinate ring R′. Instead, the main theorem [F2] identifies their quotient targets canonically on each invariant coordinate chart: both localized degree-zero rings equal the invariant regular functions on that affine chart, these charts cover both targets, and their localization maps agree. The resulting canonical isomorphism Y≅Y′ identifies π with π′ because both chart morphisms arise from the same inclusions of invariant functions.

2.1F1step 1.1

Transport of (i) and (ii). By [F1] applied to the linear action on X′ the stable locus X′s is open and G-stable, Y′s=π′(X′s) is open in Y′, X′s=π′−1(Y′s), and π′:X′s→Y′s is a geometric quotient with orbit fibres and OY′s≅(π∗′OX′s)G. Transporting along i and the identification of step 1.1 gives that Xs(L) is open and G-stable, Ys=π(Xs(L)) is open in Y, Xs(L)=π−1(Ys), and π:Xs(L)→Ys is a geometric quotient with orbit fibres and OYs≅(π∗OXs(L))G. This proves (i) and (ii).

2.2F2step 1.1

Veronese compatibility (iii). The locus equalities Xss(L)=Xss(L⊗m) and Xs(L)=Xs(L⊗m) and the identification of the quotient data by the Veronese isomorphism are the corresponding clauses of [F2]; closedness of an orbit in the semistable locus and finiteness of a stabilizer are read in the same identified locus, so the geometric restrictions to the stable loci are identified as well. This proves (iii).

3.1F1F2F3F5step 2.1

Chart description (iv). Let x∈Xs(L), so x′=i(x)∈X′s by step 2.1. By [F1] the point x′ lies in a chart XF′, F∈R>0′G, in which all G-orbits are closed, and Gx′ is finite; by [F3] the form F restricts to an invariant section σ∈Γ(X,L⊗mdeg⁡F)G with i(Xσ)=XF′, and i identifies the stabilizers and the closedness of orbits, so all orbits in Xσ are closed and Gx is finite. Conversely let σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n)G and x∈Xσ with all orbits in Xσ closed and Gx finite. By [F5], Xσ=π−1(D+(σ)) is saturated. The quotient map is constant on Gx and hence on its closure in Xss(L), since the fibre over π(x) is closed. That fibre lies in Xσ, because π(x)∈D+(σ). Therefore any point of Gx‾∩Xss(L) lies in Xσ; as the orbit is closed there by assumption, it has no boundary point in Xss(L) and is closed in the semistable locus. Thus x∈Xs(L). This proves (iv).

3.2F1step 1.1

The case Xs(L)=Xss(L) (v). If Xs(L)=Xss(L), then X′s=X′ss by step 2.1, so π′ is a geometric quotient of X′ss by [F1]; transporting along the identifications of step 1.1 gives that π is a geometric quotient of Xss(L). This proves (v).

4.1F4step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2∎

Assertions (i)-(v) are established: (i) and (ii) in step 2.1, (iii) in step 2.2, (iv) in step 3.1 and (v) in step 3.2. No new selection is made; the Axiom of Choice is inherited from the named suppliers [F4].

Remarks

  • Both descriptions of stability. The invariant-chart description (iv) is the form in which stability is checked on the companion page; it is transported from the linear-action theorem through the equivariant embedding in steps 1.1 and 3.1, so the ample case is reduced to the linear one rather than re-proved chart by chart.
  • No numerical criterion. As in the linear-action theorem, no Hilbert--Mumford criterion is involved; all statements are about orbits and invariant sections.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources