Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine chart quotients for invariant sections of a linear action

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group, V a finite-dimensional rational G-module, X⊆P(V) a G-stable closed projective algebraic set with homogeneous coordinate ring R=R(X)=C[V]/I(X~) (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and let f∈RG be homogeneous of positive degree. Then:

(i) the nonvanishing locus Xf⊆X is affine and G-stable; (ii) O(Xf)G=(RG)(f), the degree-zero part of the localization of the invariant ring; (iii) the affine quotient morphism πf:Xf→D+(f)=Spec⁡(RG)(f) corresponding to the inclusion O(Xf)G⊆O(Xf) is a good quotient of the G-action on Xf (Good and geometric quotients for group actions), with πf−1(D+(f))=Xf; (iv) the morphisms πf for varying f are compatible on overlaps D+(fg)=D+(f)∩D+(g), in the sense that πf and πg both restrict to the affine quotient of Xfg.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a finite-dimensional rational G-module V, a G-stable closed projective algebraic set X⊆P(V) with homogeneous coordinate ring R=C[V]/I and homogeneous invariant f∈RG of positive degree d≥1.

[F1]

Charts are affine and stable. For the homogeneous coordinate ring R, Xf is the affine Proj chart of [F2], even when X is reducible. Invariance of f makes its zero locus G-stable: f(gv)=f(v) for lifts v in the affine cone. Thus Xf is G-stable.

[F2]

Sections of the basic opens. On the chart D+(f)=Spec⁡R(f) of Proj⁡R one has Γ(D+(f),M~)=M(f) for every graded R-module M, naturally in f and M; for M=R this identifies O(Xf)=R(f), and Xf is the affine chart of X with coordinate ring R(f). (Sections of a graded-module sheaf on a standard open, Associated sheaf of a graded module on Proj, Standard opens are affine)

[F3]

Invariants of a localization. R is a graded rational G-algebra with G acting by graded algebra automorphisms and with Reynolds operator RR preserving degrees (naturality of the Reynolds operator applied to the graded pieces); hence (Rf)G=(RG)f compatibly with the grading and ((Rf)0)G=(RG)(f). (Invariants of a localization at an invariant element, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring)

[F4]

Finite generation. RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra by Nagata's theorem; moreover for a finitely generated graded C-algebra A=⨁An with A0=C and a homogeneous element h of positive degree, the degree-zero part A(h) of the localization is a finitely generated C-algebra. Finite generation of RG is Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated; the degree-zero localization assertion is proved directly in step 1.2.

[F5]

The affine quotient and Reynolds splitting. The classical affine invariant-theory theorem gives the categorical quotient and the closed-point orbit conclusions. For any rational algebra C, its Reynolds operator is a CG-linear retraction C→CG, natural under equivariant maps, so it preserves invariant ideals; quotient maps are surjective on invariants. Tensor products compute affine scheme fibres, and every nonzero algebra has a prime ideal under AC. These facts give the scheme good-quotient clauses explicitly below, without identifying complex closed points with all primes. (Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient, The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring, Complete reducibility and the Reynolds operator for a complex reductive group, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)

[F6]

AC. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers and is not used directly here. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

Affineness and stability. If X=∅, its homogeneous coordinate ring is zero, the invariant ring and every localized chart ring are zero, both loci and every quotient target are empty, and all conclusions hold with the empty morphisms. Assume henceforth X≠∅. The sheaf O(1)∣X is ample and linearized, and f is an invariant global section of O(d)∣X (homogeneous coordinate ring, affine cone projective set), and [F2] identifies Xf with the affine chart D+(f) of Proj⁡R. Its G-stability follows from [F1].

1.2F4algebra

Finite generation of the invariant ring of the chart. RG is a finitely generated graded C-algebra with (RG)0=C by [F4], so (RG)(f) is a finitely generated C-algebra by the second part of [F4]: indeed, if RG=C[u1,…,ur] with ui homogeneous of degrees ei and d=deg⁡f, then (RG)(f) is generated by the finitely many elements uid/fei together with the elements (∏iuiεi)/fl for all exponent vectors 0≤εi<d with ∑εiei=dl, because every monomial ∏uiai of degree divisible by d splits as ∏i(uid)qi⋅∏iuiεi with εi<d and the remainder of degree divisible by d.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

The invariant coordinate ring of the chart. By [F2] the chart D+(f) of Proj⁡R has coordinate ring R(f), and the affine chart Xf has coordinate ring O(Xf)=R(f). By [F3] applied to the graded rational G-algebra R and the homogeneous invariant f, (R(f))G=((Rf)0)G=(RG)(f); this proves (ii).

3.1F5step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

The chart quotient is a scheme good quotient. Put C=O(Xf) and B=CG=(RG)(f) by step 2.1. The affine scheme morphism πf:Spec⁡C→Spec⁡B=D+(f) is invariant and affine. It is surjective at every scheme point: the B-linear Reynolds retraction splits B↪C, so for every prime p⊂B tensoring gives an injection κ(p)↪C⊗Bκ(p). This nonzero fibre algebra has a prime by [F5]. On each principal target open D(b), the rational-localized Reynolds computation gives (Cb)G=Bb, so the sheaf clause holds on a basis and hence on all opens. For a closed invariant subset with radical stable ideal I⊂C, invariant exactness gives (C/I)G=B/(I∩B). Applying the same Reynolds-splitting fibre argument to C/I shows its image is exactly the scheme closed subset V(I∩B). If two such subsets are disjoint, their ideals satisfy I+J=C; write 1=a+b, apply Reynolds, and use preservation of stable ideals to obtain 1∈(I∩B)+(J∩B), so their scheme images are disjoint. These are all good-quotient clauses, proving (iii); the target is D+(f), so πf−1(D+(f))=Xf.

4.1F2F6step 2.1step 3.1∎

Compatibility. For invariant homogeneous f,g of positive degrees the charts satisfy D+(fg)=D+(f)∩D+(g) and Xfg=Xf∩Xg, and localizing the identifications of step 2.1 at h=gdeg⁡f/fdeg⁡g gives O(Xfg)=(O(Xf))h with invariant ring ((RG)(f))h=(RG)(fg); both πf and πg restrict on Xfg to the affine quotient morphism with target Spec⁡(RG)(fg)=D+(fg), because the corresponding ring maps are the canonical localizations of O(Xf)G→O(Xf) and of O(Xg)G→O(Xg) at the same localization. This is assertion (iv) and completes the proof; no new choice is made, the Axiom of Choice being inherited from the invariant-theory and quotient suppliers [F6].

Remarks

  • Degrees in the overlap. The identification on the overlap is functoriality of localization: the chart ring R(fg) is the localization of R(f) at gdeg⁡f/fdeg⁡g, and likewise for the invariant rings, so no choice of isomorphism is involved.
  • Finite generation of the chart. Step 1.2 proves this by a finite list of monomial fractions; it does not apply the positively graded finite-generation lemma to a degree-zero localization.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

100 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources