Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated

Statement

Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory suppliers. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group and let A=⨁n≥0An be a finitely generated graded commutative C-algebra with A0=C, equipped with a rational action of G by graded algebra automorphisms (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules). Then the graded invariant subalgebra AG=⨁n≥0AnG is a finitely generated C-algebra.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group G, a finitely generated graded C-algebra A with A0=C and a rational action of G on A by graded algebra automorphisms.

[F1]

Local finiteness. Every element of a rational G-module lies in a finite-dimensional G-stable subspace on which G acts by a morphism; sums of finitely many such subspaces are again finite-dimensional and G-stable. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)

[F2]

Finite homogeneous generation. There are finitely many homogeneous elements a1,…,ar generating A as a C-algebra, with ai∈Adi, di≥1 because A0=C; the invariant subalgebra is graded, AG=⨁nAnG. (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)

[F3]

Surjectivity of invariants. If φ:B→A is a surjective G-equivariant homomorphism of rational G-algebras, then φ(BG)=AG; the conclusion holds also for the graded subalgebra of invariants. (The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring (c), (d))

[F4]

Invariants of a finite-dimensional module. For a finite-dimensional rational G-module W the invariant algebra C[W∗]G is a finitely generated C-algebra, and C[W∗]=Sym⁡(W) as a graded algebra. (Invariants of a finite-dimensional module are finitely generated)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2algebra

A finite-dimensional generating module. By [F2] choose homogeneous generators a1,…,ar of A. By [F1] each ai lies in a finite-dimensional G-stable subspace Wi; since A=⨁nAn and the action is graded, the homogeneous components of the elements of Wi span a finite-dimensional graded G-stable space containing ai, so we may take each Wi graded. Then W=W1+⋯+Wr is a finite-dimensional graded G-stable subspace of A whose elements contain the generators ai, hence generate A as a C-algebra.

2.1F4step 1.1construct

The symmetric algebra surjection. The universal property of the symmetric algebra of the finite-dimensional graded vector space W gives a graded C-algebra surjection φ:Sym⁡(W)→A sending W identically onto its image in A; it is G-equivariant because W is G-stable and the identification Sym⁡(W)=C[W∗] carries the induced action to the action on polynomial functions.

3.1F3F4step 2.1

By [F3] the induced map on invariants Sym⁡(W)G→AG is surjective, and Sym⁡(W)G=C[W∗]G is a finitely generated C-algebra by [F4].

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

A quotient of a finitely generated C-algebra is finitely generated, so AG is finitely generated, as claimed; the argument is the graded form of Nagata's theorem used by Brion and Hoskins.

Remarks

  • Noetherianity of A. The hypothesis that A is finitely generated over C is what makes A Noetherian and the quotient argument in step 3.1 available; no Hilbert-basis input beyond finite generation is used.
  • Gradings. The proof keeps the Z≥0-grading throughout: the generators are homogeneous, the module W is chosen graded, and the surjection of step 2.1 is a graded map, so the finite generating set produced for AG consists of homogeneous invariants.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources