How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Graded invariants of a finitely generated rational G-algebra are finitely generated
Statement
Assume AC inherited from the invariant-theory suppliers. Let be a complex reductive affine algebraic group and let be a finitely generated graded commutative -algebra with , equipped with a rational action of by graded algebra automorphisms (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules). Then the graded invariant subalgebra is a finitely generated -algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex reductive affine algebraic group , a finitely generated graded -algebra with and a rational action of on by graded algebra automorphisms.
Local finiteness. Every element of a rational -module lies in a finite-dimensional -stable subspace on which acts by a morphism; sums of finitely many such subspaces are again finite-dimensional and -stable. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)
Finite homogeneous generation. There are finitely many homogeneous elements generating as a -algebra, with , because ; the invariant subalgebra is graded, . (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists)
Surjectivity of invariants. If is a surjective -equivariant homomorphism of rational -algebras, then ; the conclusion holds also for the graded subalgebra of invariants. (The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring (c), (d))
Invariants of a finite-dimensional module. For a finite-dimensional rational -module the invariant algebra is a finitely generated -algebra, and as a graded algebra. (Invariants of a finite-dimensional module are finitely generated)
Proof
A finite-dimensional generating module. By [F2] choose homogeneous generators of . By [F1] each lies in a finite-dimensional -stable subspace ; since and the action is graded, the homogeneous components of the elements of span a finite-dimensional graded -stable space containing , so we may take each graded. Then is a finite-dimensional graded -stable subspace of whose elements contain the generators , hence generate as a -algebra.
The symmetric algebra surjection. The universal property of the symmetric algebra of the finite-dimensional graded vector space gives a graded -algebra surjection sending identically onto its image in ; it is -equivariant because is -stable and the identification carries the induced action to the action on polynomial functions.
By [F3] the induced map on invariants is surjective, and is a finitely generated -algebra by [F4].
A quotient of a finitely generated -algebra is finitely generated, so is finitely generated, as claimed; the argument is the graded form of Nagata's theorem used by Brion and Hoskins.
Remarks
- Noetherianity of . The hypothesis that is finitely generated over is what makes Noetherian and the quotient argument in step 3.1 available; no Hilbert-basis input beyond finite generation is used.
- Gradings. The proof keeps the -grading throughout: the generators are homogeneous, the module is chosen graded, and the surjection of step 2.1 is a graded map, so the finite generating set produced for consists of homogeneous invariants.
Depends on
- Invariants of a finite-dimensional module are finitely generated
- The Reynolds operator and the ideal theory of the invariant subring
- Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules
- Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Victoria Hoskins, Moduli Problems and Geometric Invariant Theory, FU Berlin lecture notes (2015/16) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22 (standard reference, not scraped)