Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Categorical and geometric quotients of classical varieties

Definition

Let G be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a classical variety X (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties, Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules). A G-invariant morphism π:X→Y is a categorical quotient if every G-invariant morphism f:X→Z of classical varieties factors uniquely as f=φ∘π with φ:Y→Z a morphism.

It is a geometric quotient (Brion Definition 1.18) if

(i) π is surjective and its fibres are exactly the G-orbits,

(ii) a subset U⊆Y is open if and only if π−1(U) is open in X, and

(iii) for every open U⊆Y the pullback of regular functions is an isomorphism OY(U)→OX(π−1(U))G onto the G-invariant regular functions on the preimage.

A geometric quotient is a categorical quotient and is unique up to unique isomorphism; when it exists its underlying topological space is the orbit space X/G with the quotient topology. For an affine G-variety X whose invariant algebra C[X]G is finitely generated, the affine model is the morphism π:X→X/ ⁣/G:=Spec⁡C[X]G induced by the inclusion C[X]G⊆C[X]. For a reductive G, the theorem below proves this finite generation and makes the model a categorical quotient with one closed orbit in each fibre (Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient ↗).

Why a geometric quotient is categorical. Let π:X→Y satisfy (i)–(iii) and let f:X→Z be a G-invariant morphism to a classical variety Z. By (i) two points of a fibre of π lie in one orbit, on which f is constant, so f factors through a unique set map fˉ:Y→Z. For W⊆Z open, π−1(fˉ−1(W))=f−1(W) is open in X by continuity of f, so fˉ−1(W) is open in Y by (ii): fˉ is continuous. If V is an affine chart of Z with coordinates s and U:=fˉ−1(V), then s∘f is a G-invariant regular function on π−1(U), hence by (iii) is the pullback along π of a unique regular function on U; that function is s∘fˉ. Since this holds for every coordinate s of an affine chart, fˉ is a morphism (A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety, Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties), and local agreement of the resulting morphisms on overlapping charts gives a morphism Y→Z. Surjectivity in (i) makes the factorisation unique. If also π′:X→Y′ is a categorical quotient, the universal property applied to π′ and to π yields morphisms φ:Y→Y′ with φπ=π′ and ψ:Y′→Y with ψπ′=π; then (φψ)π′=π′ and (ψφ)π=π, so uniqueness of the factorisation of π′ through π′ and of π through π forces φψ=id⁡Y′ and ψφ=id⁡Y. Thus categorical and geometric quotients are unique up to unique isomorphism, and for a geometric quotient (i)–(ii) say exactly that the underlying map is the quotient map of the orbit equivalence relation with the quotient topology.

Conventions. This is the classical notion of Brion Definition 1.18 and the paragraph after Theorem 1.24. The scheme-theoretic fppf quotient sheaf on the AG-ACT-1 page is a different object and is not identified with this classical notion here. In the classical register, Spec⁡ of a finitely generated reduced complex algebra denotes its associated affine variety of complex closed points with the classical regular-function sheaf; no identification with the space of every scheme prime is used. For empty X the coordinate algebra is zero and its quotient is empty; finite generation and the universal properties below are then immediate and fibre assertions are vacuous. The definition itself uses no Axiom of Choice; the finite-generation theorem referred to above inherits AC from its own named suppliers, so consumers of that theorem carry AC, while nothing in this definition does.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources