How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The invariant section ring and the projective GIT quotient
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the Proj construction. Let be a complex affine algebraic group acting algebraically on a complex projective variety , let be an ample -linearized invertible sheaf (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens), and let be its graded section ring (Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring). Write for the graded subalgebra of -invariant sections.
The projective GIT quotient of by with respect to is the -scheme (Points of Proj of a graded ring, Proj carries a scheme structure), the Proj of the graded invariant subalgebra.
For a homogeneous invariant section with write for the standard open chart of , and for the nonvanishing locus of .
The construction is recorded together with the given linearization and the ample sheaf ; replacing by a positive tensor power does not change the Proj (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading).
Remarks
- Ampleness. The definition uses the ampleness of only to know that the section ring has sufficiently many sections for the construction to be the GIT quotient; the Proj itself is defined for any graded algebra, and, when is reductive, the quotient properties of are proved in Projective GIT quotient for a linear action and The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring.
- Finite generation is not asserted here. The definition does not claim that is finitely generated, nor that is of finite type; For reductive , both are proved in the two theorems just named, the first in the linear case and the second in the ample case.
- Dependence on the linearization. The quotient genuinely depends on the chosen linearization of and not only on the isomorphism class of ; this is recorded in G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety and demonstrated on the companion page by The semistable locus depends on the linearization, not only on the sheaf ↗ and GIT quotients of the projective line for different linearizations ↗.
- Veronese invariance. Replacing by replaces by its -th Veronese subalgebra and leaves unchanged (Proj is invariant under Veronese regrading).
Depends on
Used by
- The semistable locus depends on the linearization, not only on the sheaf Counterexample
- Semistable and stable points for a linearization Definition
- GIT quotients of the projective line for different linearizations Example
- Projective GIT quotient for a linear action Theorem
- The projective GIT quotient from the invariant section ring Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. E. Newstead, Geometric Invariant Theory, lecture notes, CIMAT Guanajuato 2006 (CEL/HAL; archived copy) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victoria Hoskins, Moduli Problems and Geometric Invariant Theory, FU Berlin lecture notes (2015/16) (standard reference, not scraped)
- I. Dolgachev, Lectures on Invariant Theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 296, Cambridge University Press, 2003 (standard reference, not scraped)