Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Linearizations of tensor powers and the equivariant section ring

Statement

For the projective constant-function conclusions in (ii) and (iii), assume AC inherited from global regular functions projective variety; the remaining conclusions use no choice principle. Let L be a G-linearized invertible sheaf on a classical complex G-variety X (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety). Then:

(i) for every n≥0 the tensor power L⊗n (with L⊗0=OX) carries an induced G-linearization, functorial in L, and the canonical multiplication isomorphisms L⊗r⊗L⊗s→L⊗(r+s) are G-equivariant;

(ii) each space of global sections Γ(X,L⊗n) carries the linear action (g⋅σ)(x)=g σ(g−1x), is a rational G-module (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules), and restriction to a G-stable open subset is G-equivariant; the constant functions in Γ(X,OX) are fixed by G, and if X is projective and irreducible then Γ(X,OX)=C;

(iii) the direct sum R(X,L)=⨁n≥0Γ(X,L⊗n) is a graded commutative C-algebra with G acting by graded algebra automorphisms, so that R(X,L) is a graded rational G-algebra with degree-zero part Γ(X,OX); if X is projective and irreducible this part is C;

(iv) for global sections σ∈Γ(X,L⊗r) and τ∈Γ(X,L⊗s) one has Xσ⊗τ=Xσ∩Xτ, and for a G-invariant section σ and every k≥1 one has Xσ⊗k=Xσ, where σ⊗k∈Γ(X,L⊗kr).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex affine algebraic group G, a classical complex G-variety X (a quasi-compact prevariety over C with an algebraic action), an invertible sheaf L on X with a G-linearization m:G×L→L.

[F1]

Linearization. The action m covers the action map σ:G×X→X, is C-linear on fibres, and is equivalently encoded by an isomorphism φ:σ∗L→pr2∗L over G×X whose pullbacks satisfy the cocycle identity; for g∈G the assignment ℓ↦gℓ is an isomorphism Lx→Lgx of lines. (G-linearizations of invertible sheaves on a complex G-variety)

[F2]

Rational modules. A rational G-module is a complex vector space with a linear left action in which every vector lies in a finite-dimensional G-stable subspace W on which G→GL(W) is a morphism of varieties. A map from a variety into a finite-dimensional vector space is a morphism exactly when its compositions with a spanning set of linear functionals are regular. (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules)

[F3]

Tensor powers of invertible sheaves. For invertible L each L⊗n is invertible, OX⊗L≅L, and there are canonical multiplication isomorphisms L⊗r⊗L⊗s→L⊗(r+s) compatible with restriction; these are used to define the graded algebra R(X,L). (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Quasi-coherent module on a scheme)

[F4]

Nonvanishing loci. For global sections s,t of invertible sheaves one has Xs∩Xt=Xs⊗t, and for an affine open U the set U∩Xs is affine; a nonzero section of a line bundle has nonempty nonvanishing locus. (A line-bundle section cuts an affine open inside an affine scheme)

[F5]

Affine products. For affine algebraic sets Y,Z the coordinate ring of Y×Z is C[Y]⊗CC[Z], so every regular function on a product of affine models is a finite sum of products of regular functions of the factors. (Products of affine algebraic sets have tensor-product coordinate rings)

[F6]

Quasi-compactness. A classical algebraic prevariety is quasi-compact with a finite affine cover, and affine models form a basis of its topology; hence any open cover can be refined to a finite affine cover, and a section of the structure sheaf that restricts to 0 on such a cover is 0. (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties)

[F7]

Projective functions. Under AC, every global regular function on a nonempty irreducible classical projective variety is constant. (global regular functions projective variety, The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3

Tensor powers. By [F1] the linearization is an isomorphism φ:σ∗L→pr2∗L whose two pullbacks to G×G×X satisfy the cocycle identity. Taking n-th tensor powers and using [F3] gives an isomorphism φ⊗n:σ∗(L⊗n)→pr2∗(L⊗n) satisfying the same cocycle identity, and the corresponding fibre maps are C-linear isomorphisms of lines; hence L⊗n carries an induced G-linearization m⊗n, and a G-equivariant isomorphism L→L′ of linearized invertible sheaves induces G-equivariant isomorphisms L⊗n→L′⊗n, which is functoriality. The canonical multiplication L⊗r⊗L⊗s→L⊗(r+s) is the associativity identification of the same tensor power constructed in two ways, so it intertwines m⊗r⊗m⊗s with m⊗(r+s): on a fibre at x both sides send (gℓ1,gℓ2) to g(ℓ1ℓ2).

1.2F1F5algebra

The action on sections. For σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n) define (g⋅σ)(x):=m⊗n(g,σ(g−1x)), an element of (L⊗n)g g−1x=(L⊗n)x. The assignment (g,x)↦(g⋅σ)(x) is the composition of the morphisms (g,x)↦(g,g−1x), id×σ, and m⊗n, so it is a regular section of pr2∗(L⊗n) over G×X; in particular g⋅σ is a global section for each g. The action is linear in σ, satisfies e⋅σ=σ, and g⋅(h⋅σ)=(gh)⋅σ by the group law of the action on the total space; restricting to a G-stable open subset U⊆X commutes with the formula, so the restriction map is G-equivariant.

1.3F4F5F6choosealgebra

Finite dimensionality of orbits. Fix σ∈Γ(X,L⊗n) and choose, using [F6], a finite affine cover X=U1∪⋯∪Uℓ such that L⊗n∣Uj is trivial, with trivializations τj. On the affine product G×Uj the section (g,x)↦g⋅σ(g−1x) corresponds under τj to a regular function, hence by [F5] to a finite sum ∑rhj,r(g)φj,r(x) with hj,r∈C[G] and φj,r∈O(Uj); write sj,r∈Γ(Uj,L⊗n) for the local section corresponding to φj,r and Vj=spanC{sj,r}r, a finite-dimensional subspace. For every g∈G the restricted section (g⋅σ)∣Uj lies in Vj, so the orbit G⋅σ is contained in the subspace Wσ={s∈Γ(X,L⊗n):s∣Uj∈Vj for all j}, which is finite-dimensional because restriction Γ(X,L⊗n)→⨁jΓ(Uj,L⊗n) is injective by [F6].

1.4F4algebra

Nonvanishing loci. For σ∈Γ(X,L⊗r) and τ∈Γ(X,L⊗s) the identification σ⊗τ∈Γ(X,L⊗r⊗L⊗s) with its image στ∈Γ(X,L⊗(r+s)) is the canonical one, so [F4] gives Xσ⊗τ=Xσ∩Xτ. For a G-invariant σ and k≥1, write σ⊗k for the k-fold product inside Γ(X,L⊗kr); trivializing L near a point x, the section σ corresponds to a regular function f and σ⊗k to fk, so fk is nonzero at x exactly when f is; hence Xσ⊗k=Xσ.

2.1F2F4F7step 1.2step 1.3

Rationality. Let Vσ⊆Wσ be the span of the orbit G⋅σ; it is G-stable by step 1.2 and finite-dimensional by step 1.3. The orbit map G→Vσ, g↦g⋅σ, is a morphism: after choosing a frame of the line fibre at x, each evaluation g↦(g⋅σ)(x) is a regular scalar function by step 1.2. These scalar evaluation functionals span Vσ∗: a section annihilated by all of them is zero, since in a local frame its coefficient is a regular function on a reduced classical variety vanishing at every point. Hence for every σ′∈Vσ the map g↦g⋅σ′ is a morphism, being a linear combination of orbit maps of spanning elements, and choosing a basis of Vσ exhibits the action of G on Vσ through matrices with regular entries; thus Vσ is a finite-dimensional rational G-module on which G acts by an algebraic action, containing σ. As σ was arbitrary, Γ(X,L⊗n) is a rational G-module. For n=0 the formula reads (g⋅f)(x)=f(g−1x), so constant functions are fixed; if X is projective and irreducible, [F7] gives Γ(X,OX)=C under its stated AC assumption.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1

Graded algebra. Define the product of homogeneous elements σ∈Γ(X,L⊗r), τ∈Γ(X,L⊗s) by στ∈Γ(X,L⊗(r+s)) obtained from σ⊗τ under the canonical isomorphism of [F3], extended bilinearly. This makes R(X,L) a commutative graded C-algebra with unit 1∈Γ(X,OX) and degree-zero part Γ(X,OX), because the multiplication maps are the canonical associativity isomorphisms of tensor powers and are C-bilinear and compatible with restriction. By step 1.1 the multiplication is G-equivariant, so each g acts by a graded algebra automorphism, and each graded piece is a rational G-module by step 2.1: R(X,L) is a graded rational G-algebra. If X is projective and irreducible the degree-zero part is C by step 2.1.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1step 3.1∎

Finally (i)-(iv) have been established: (i) in step 1.1, (ii) in steps 1.2, 1.3 and 2.1, (iii) in step 3.1, and (iv) in step 1.4. In particular every space of sections of a tensor power of a linearized invertible sheaf is a rational G-module and R(X,L) is a graded rational G-algebra, as asserted.

Remarks

  • Correction at degree zero. The scaffold wrote Γ(X,OX)=C; this holds for projective irreducible X (as used on this page) but fails for affine X, where Γ(X,OX)=O(X) is the whole coordinate ring. The statement above records the constants and the projective case separately.
  • Restriction to projective X used downstream. Every consumer of this item on the page works with a projective variety X, where also the degree-zero part of the section ring is C.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources