Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The tautological degree-one class is well defined and fiber generating

Statement

Assume AC, let EB be a numerable real vector bundle of rank n1 over an paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type, and form P(E), γE and xEH1(P(E);F2) as in Tautological degree-one class on a real projective bundle. Then:

  1. the class xE does not depend on the classifying map of γE used to define it;
  2. for every bB, restriction to the fiber P(Eb)P(E) carries xE to the standard generator of H1(P(Eb);F2) when n2, and to zero when n=1;
  3. consequently 1,xE,,xEn1 restrict on every fiber P(Eb)RPn1 to the standard F2-basis 1,a,,an1 of H(P(Eb);F2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a numerable real rank-n bundle EB with n1 over an paracompact Hausdorff CGWH base of CW homotopy type, and the construction of xE from a classifying map of γE.

[F1]

Under AC, pullback of the universal real rank-one bundle gives a bijection from unbased homotopy classes of maps [X,RP] to numerable real line bundles on every paracompact Hausdorff CGWH space X (Real and complex vector bundles are classified by stable Grassmannians).

[F2]

Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular cohomology with every coefficient group (Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology).

[F3]

Restriction along the standard skeletal inclusion im:RPmRP is an isomorphism in degrees at most m and sends the generator a to the unique nonzero degree-one class on RPm when m1, and to zero when m=0; also H(RP;F2)=F2[a] (Mod-two cohomology ring of infinite real projective space).

[F4]

Real projective space RPm has a finite CW structure with one cell in degrees 0,,m (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map). Cellular cochains with the constant F2 system compute singular cohomology, so there is no cohomology above degree m (Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients).

[F5]

For 0m and m+1N the inclusion Gr1(Rm+1)Gr1(RN) pulls the tautological line back to the tautological line over Gr1(Rm+1), because the tautological bundle is the bundle of pairs (W,v) with vW and the inclusion is induced by the ambient coordinate inclusions (Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles); a map with that pullback property is what it means to classify the line (Tautological degree-one class on a real projective bundle).

[F6]

Pullback of cohomology is a unital ring homomorphism, so it carries xk to the k-th power of the pulled-back class (Cup product is natural, unital and associative).

[F7]

For a fiber P(Eb) of the projective bundle, the restriction of γE is the tautological line of the fiber Eb (Real projective bundle and tautological line).

[F8]

Every compact topological space is paracompact (Every compact space is paracompact).

[A1]

AC is the Axiom of Choice in the form fixed by The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

1.1

Let c,c:P(E)RP be any two classifying maps as in the definition. They have isomorphic tautological pullbacks, both isomorphic to γE. By the projective definition P(E) is paracompact Hausdorff CGWH and γE is numerable, so injectivity of the bijection [F1] gives equality of the actual unbased homotopy classes [c]=[c]. Thus [F2] gives ca=ca. This proves independence for all classifying maps, without limiting them to any particular embedding construction. AC is inherited from the stated projective and classification interfaces.

F1F2F7A1
2.1

Restriction to a fiber. Fix bB and identify the fiber P(Eb) with RPn1 through a linear isomorphism EbRn; write i:P(Eb)P(E) for the inclusion. By [F7] the pullback iγE is the tautological line γ1 over P(Eb)RPn1, and the standard inclusion j:RPn1RP satisfies jγ1γ1 by [F5]. On the other hand (ci)γ1icγ1iγEγ1, so ci and j are two maps to RP with isomorphic pullbacks of the tautological line. The fiber is a compact Hausdorff finite CW complex, hence paracompact by [F8] and CGWH. Its tautological line is numerable by the same finite coordinate partition used in the projective definition. Injectivity of the classification bijection [F1] therefore gives an actual homotopy cij on this fiber. Therefore [F2] and the definition of xE give ixE=(ci)a=ja, which is the standard generator of H1(RPn1;F2) when n11 and zero when n1=0, by [F3]. This proves clause 2.

F1F2F3F5F7F8step 1.1
3.1

Fiber basis. Restriction i:H(P(E);F2)H(P(Eb);F2) is a unital ring homomorphism, so [F6] gives i(xEk)=(ixE)k. By step 2.1 this is ak for every k0, with the convention that a0=1 and that a=0 when n=1; in particular i(1)=1. By [F3], restriction is an isomorphism in every degree from zero to n1, so its images 1,a,,an1 are nonzero and span their respective one-dimensional groups. By [F4] there are no groups in higher degrees. They therefore form an F2-basis; they are the restrictions of 1,xE,,xEn1. For n=1 the fiber is RP0, a point, and the list reduces to 1. For n2 the class ixE=a is nonzero and generates H1 of the fiber. This proves clause 3.

F3F4F6step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources