Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Total linking is intersection with a spanning surface for a link

Statement

Assume full AC. Let L=K1∪⋯∪Kr⊂S3 be a nonempty smooth oriented link, let F be a compact smooth oriented embedded surface with oriented boundary L, and put X=S3∖L. For each component Ki, let μi be the positive meridian, oriented as the boundary of a small normal disk so that a positive tangent to Ki followed by the disk's positive basis gives the ambient orientation. Alexander duality identifies H1(X;Z) with the free abelian group on [μ1],…,[μr]. Define the total-linking homomorphism φ:H1(X;Z)→Z by φ(∑imi[μi])=∑imi. If a smooth oriented loop J⊂X is transverse to the interior of F, define its signed intersection number J⋅F by counting +1 when J crosses from the negative to the positive side of the oriented normal of F and −1 for the reverse crossing. Then J⋅F=φ([J]).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a nonempty smooth oriented link L, a compact oriented spanning surface F with boundary L, and a smooth loop J in X=S3∖L transverse to the interior of F.

[A1]

Full AC is the ambient choice hypothesis for the Alexander-duality convention. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The link complement X is connected, and Alexander duality identifies H1(X;Z) with Zr on the positive meridian basis; total linking is the sum of the component coordinates. The complement of an oriented link is a connected smooth three-manifold, The one-variable Alexander module of an oriented link

[F2]

Under full AC, relative Whitney approximation smooths continuous maps that are already smooth near a closed set while fixing a smaller neighbourhood of that set; full AC implies its ACω hypothesis by AC implies DC implies countable choice. Reparametrizing a loop to be constant near its basepoint, or a homotopy to be constant on endpoint collars, creates such a region. Relative transversality then makes the map transverse to Int⁡F while fixing a smaller collar. The submanifold Int⁡F=F∖L is closed in X. Relative Whitney approximation for manifold-valued maps, The transversality homotopy theorem, Relative transversality preserves a map on a closed good region

[F3]

The degree-one Hurewicz map sends π1(X,x0) onto H1(X;Z) and factors through abelianization. The first Hurewicz map is abelianization

Proof

Given: Full AC, L, F, X, J, and the conventions of the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2givenconstruct

Choose a basepoint x0∈X∖F, which exists on a local side of any interior point of F. Represent any class of π1(X,x0) by a continuous based loop, reparametrize it to be constant near the basepoint, and apply relative Whitney approximation followed by relative transversality from [F2]. This gives a smooth based representative transverse to Int⁡F, still constant near x0. Define IF on that class to be its signed intersection count. If two such loops are homotopic in X, reparametrize the homotopy to be constant on endpoint collars. It is then smooth on a neighbourhood of the closed collars, so [F2] smooths it relative to a smaller collar and makes it transverse to Int⁡F. The inverse image of Int⁡F is a compact oriented one-manifold in the homotopy annulus; it is compact because the annulus image is disjoint from L=∂F. Orient it using the orientations of the annulus and the normal of F. Its oriented boundary signs at the two ends are the intersection signs of the endpoint loops with opposite signs on the two boundary circles. The total signed boundary count is zero, so the endpoint intersection counts agree. Concatenation adds counts, hence IF:π1(X,x0)→Z is a homomorphism.

1.2F1givenconstruct

Near a point of Ki, choose oriented local coordinates (x,y,z) in which Ki is the x-axis and F is the half-plane y≥0, z=0. The boundary orientation and the stated positive-meridian convention make (x,y,z) ambient-positive. The small positive meridian crosses this half-plane exactly once, at (0,ρ,0) for some ρ>0, in the +z direction. Thus I‾F([μi])=1 for every i.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

By [F3], this homomorphism factors through a homomorphism I‾F:H1(X;Z)→Z. The signed intersection convention in the Statement agrees with this induced map on the class represented by J.

3.1F1step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

By [F1], the classes [μi] form a basis of H1(X;Z). The homomorphisms I‾F and φ agree on every basis element by step 1.2 and [F1], so they are equal. Evaluating this equality on [J] gives J⋅F=φ([J]).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources