Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming countable choice, an ambient metric identifies the two normal bundles

Statement

Assume ACω. Let S⊆M be an embedded submanifold and let g be a Riemannian metric on M. If q:TM∣S→ν(S)=TM∣S/TS is the quotient map, then

q∣TS⊥:TS⊥⟶ν(S)

is a smooth vector-bundle isomorphism. Thus the fixed metric g canonically identifies the quotient normal bundle with its g-orthogonal realization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The axiom ACω, an embedded submanifold S⊆M, and an ambient Riemannian metric g on M.

[L0]

Under ACω, TM has a smooth manifold structure for which the induced tangent-bundle charts form a smooth atlas (Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure).

[L4]

An induced tangent-bundle chart sends v=∑ivi∂xi∣p to (x(p),(v1,…,vn)) (The induced tangent bundle chart).

[L5]

A smooth vector bundle is locally trivialized by fibrewise linear charts (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

[L6]

The inclusion i:S↪M is smooth (The inclusion of an embedded submanifold is a smooth embedding).

[L7]

Pullback along a smooth map carries a smooth vector bundle to a smooth vector bundle (The pullback fibre product is a smooth vector bundle).

[L8]

In a slice chart, S is a coordinate slice (Embedded submanifolds and slice charts).

[L9]

A smooth subbundle is locally spanned by part of a smooth ambient frame (Vector subbundles).

[F0]

A smooth bundle metric is a fibrewise inner product whose pairing of any two smooth local sections is smooth (Smooth bundle metrics).

[L1]

The orthogonal complement of a smooth subbundle is a smooth subbundle (Orthogonal complements of subbundles are smooth subbundles).

[L2]

The quotient map TM∣S→ν(S) is a smooth bundle map (The canonical map to a quotient bundle is a smooth bundle map).

[L3]

A fibrewise bijective smooth bundle map over the identity is a bundle isomorphism (A fibrewise bijective smooth bundle map over a diffeomorphism is a bundle isomorphism).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F0L0L1L4L5L6L7L8L9given

By [L0], [L4], and [L5], the induced charts make TM→M a smooth vector bundle. By [L6] and [L7], its pullback along i is the smooth vector bundle TM∣S→S. In a slice chart from [L8], its coordinate frame is ∂x1,…,∂xk,∂y1,…,∂yc and TS is spanned by the first k vectors, so [L9] makes TS a smooth subbundle. In that pulled-back frame, the coefficients of g∣S are the smooth coefficient functions of g composed with the smooth inclusion i; hence [F0] makes g∣S a smooth bundle metric on TM∣S. Applying [L1], the orthogonal complements TSp⊥ form a smooth subbundle and fibrewise TpM=TpS⊕TpS⊥.

2.1L2L3step 1.1algebra∎

Restrict the quotient map of [L2] to TS⊥. On each fibre this is the usual linear isomorphism from a chosen complement onto the quotient by TpS. Hence the restricted map TS⊥→ν(S) is fibrewise bijective, so [L3] shows that it is a smooth bundle isomorphism.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources