Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smale-Hirsch makes rank reduction sufficient for Euclidean immersion in positive codimension

Statement

Assume countable choice ACω. Let Mm be a closed smooth m-manifold, let k≥1, and let (ν,φ) be a rank-k stable normal inverse of M, so that φ:TM⊕ν→εm+k (Stable normal inverse of the tangent bundle). Then there exists an immersion M↬Rm+k. Together with An immersion into R^n gives a rank-(n-m) representative of the stable normal bundle this says that for closed M and k≥1 the existence of an immersion M↬Rm+k is equivalent to the existence of a rank-k stable normal inverse; that equivalence is the precise sense in which the normal problem is complete for immersions on this page. No classification of regular homotopy classes and no statement about the normal bundle of the particular immersion produced is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed smooth m-manifold M, an integer k≥1, a rank-k stable normal inverse (ν,φ) with φ:TM⊕ν→εm+k, and ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

A formal immersion from M to N is a pair (f,F) with f:M→N smooth and F:TM→TN a smooth bundle map over f that is injective on every fibre; a smooth map f is an immersion exactly when (f,df) is a formal immersion. The spaces Imm⁡(M,N) and FImm⁡(M,N) carry the weak compact-open topologies, and the derivative map D:f↦(f,df) maps the former into the latter (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Space of immersions and space of formal immersions).

[F2]

Assume ACω; for smooth boundaryless Mm,Nn with m<n (positive codimension), the derivative map D:Imm⁡(M,N)→FImm⁡(M,N) is a weak homotopy equivalence (The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem).

[F3]

A weak homotopy equivalence induces a bijection on path-component sets π0 (Weak homotopy equivalence).

[F4]

The constant map c:M→Rm+k, x↦0, pulls the trivial bundle back to εm+k: c∗TRm+k≅c∗εm+k≅εm+k canonically, by the product-pullback lemma and the standard-coordinate trivialization of the Euclidean tangent bundle (Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure, The induced tangent bundle chart, The pullback of a trivial smooth vector bundle is canonically trivial).

[F5]

Conversely, if M is closed and f:M↬Rm+k is a smooth immersion with m+k>m, its normal bundle is a rank-k stable normal inverse of M (An immersion into R^n gives a rank-(n-m) representative of the stable normal bundle).

Proof

1.1F1F4

Define F:=φ∣TM:TM→εm+k as the restriction of the bundle isomorphism φ to the first summand; this is a smooth bundle map over M, injective on every fibre. By [F4], it determines a smooth fibrewise injective map TM→c∗TRm+k over id⁡M. Composing with the canonical map c∗TRm+k→TRm+k gives a smooth bundle map F~ over c, so (c,F~) is a formal immersion by [F1]. Thus FImm⁡(M,Rm+k) is nonempty.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1

By [F2] with N=Rm+k (boundaryless, positive codimension k≥1) the derivative map D is a weak homotopy equivalence; by [F3] it induces a bijection on path components. Since FImm⁡(M,Rm+k) is nonempty by step 1.1 and π0(D) is surjective, the target's empty-or-non-empty status matches the source's, so Imm⁡(M,Rm+k) is nonempty: there exists a smooth immersion M↬Rm+k.

3.1F2F5step 1.1step 2.1∎

Conversely, every smooth immersion M↬Rm+k of the closed M has a rank-k normal bundle which is a rank-k stable normal inverse by [F5], under the same ACω. Therefore for closed M and k≥1 the existence of an immersion into Rm+k is equivalent to the existence of a rank-k stable normal inverse: reduction of the structure problem to the normal bundle is sufficient as well as necessary, which is the completeness statement of the design. The argument selects no immersion canonically (it only proves nonemptiness of a space), asserts nothing about the regular homotopy class of the immersion produced, and makes no claim about its normal bundle; the only choice used is the ACω assumed by the Smale-Hirsch theorem and by the normal-bundle splitting.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources