Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An immersion into R^n gives a rank-(n-m) representative of the stable normal bundle

Statement

Assume ACω. Let f:Mm↬Rn be a smooth immersion of a closed smooth m-manifold with n>m, so that (f,df) is a formal immersion and νf=f∗TRn/df(TM) is its normal bundle of rank n−m (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Normal bundle of a formal immersion). Then the splitting of the tangent-normal sequence of Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity gives a smooth bundle isomorphism TM⊕νf→f∗TRn, which under the canonical trivialization f∗TRn≅εn becomes a smooth isomorphism φ:TM⊕νf→εn. Hence (νf,φ) is a rank-(n−m) stable normal inverse of M in the sense of Stable normal inverse of the tangent bundle: an immersion of codimension n−m supplies an actual rank-(n−m) representative of the inverse normal class, not merely a stable one. The choice hypothesis is inherited from the bundle-metric splitting in the normal-bundle construction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth immersion f:Mm↬Rn of a closed smooth m-manifold with n>m, and countable choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

A smooth map f is an immersion exactly when (f,df) is a formal immersion; a formal immersion from Mm to Nn is a smooth map together with a fibrewise injective smooth bundle map over it, and, when M is nonempty, necessarily m≤n (Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps, Formal immersion between smooth manifolds).

[F2]

For a formal immersion (f,F) from Mm to Nn, the normal bundle νF=f∗TN/F(TM) is a smooth quotient bundle of rank n−m over M when m≤n; if M=∅ and m>n, it is the empty rank-zero bundle; it is intrinsic up to canonical isomorphism, and for (f,F)=(f,df) with f a genuine immersion it is the normal bundle of the immersion (Normal bundle of a formal immersion).

[F3]

For every formal immersion (f,F) the quotient map fits into the short exact sequence of smooth bundles 0→TM→Ff∗TN→νF→0 over M, which splits: a smooth complement of F(TM) restricts to an isomorphism onto νF and yields a smooth bundle isomorphism TM⊕νF→f∗TN restricting to F on the tangent summand. If a smooth bundle metric on f∗TN is chosen, the orthogonal complement F(TM)⊥ is a canonical complement for that metric (Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity). The splitting in the general case uses the metric and inherits ACω.

[F4]

Under ACω the identity chart of Rn is a global smooth chart, so its induced tangent-bundle chart trivializes the Euclidean tangent bundle, TRn≅εRnn; pulling this trivialization back along f and applying the choice-free product-pullback lemma gives the canonical trivialization f∗TRn≅f∗εRnn≅εn (Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure, The induced tangent bundle chart, The pullback of a trivial smooth vector bundle is canonically trivial).

[F5]

A stable normal inverse of M is a pair (ν,φ) with ν→M a smooth real vector bundle of finite rank k and φ:TM⊕ν→εm+k a smooth bundle isomorphism; a rank-k stable normal inverse is one with rank⁡ν=k (Stable normal inverse of the tangent bundle).

Proof

1.1F1F2

Since f is an immersion, (f,df) is a formal immersion from Mm to Rn by [F1]; in particular df:TM→f∗TRn is fibrewise injective. By [F2] its normal bundle νf=f∗TRn/df(TM) is a smooth real vector bundle over M of rank n−m.

1.2F2F3

By [F3] the quotient sequence 0→TM→dff∗TRn→νf→0 splits: the tangent-normal sequence admits a smooth bundle isomorphism s:TM⊕νf⟶f∗TRn restricting to df on the tangent summand. The splitting uses a smooth bundle metric on the pullback bundle (whose existence is the countable-choice input of that lemma), so this step uses exactly the hypothesis ACω and no more.

2.1F3F4step 1.2

Compose the splitting s with the canonical trivialization t:f∗TRn→εn supplied by [F4], which exists because the identity chart of Rn trivializes TRn and the product-pullback lemma trivializes its pullback along f: φ:=t∘s:TM⊕νf⟶εn is a smooth bundle isomorphism, the composite of two smooth bundle isomorphisms.

3.1F3F4F5step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

By step 1.1 the bundle νf has rank n−m and by step 2.1 the isomorphism φ maps TM⊕νf onto εn=εm+(n−m); so (νf,φ) is a rank-(n−m) stable normal inverse of M in the sense of [F5]. Thus an immersion of codimension n−m provides an actual rank-(n−m) inverse bundle, not merely a stable one; nothing beyond this rank and the isomorphism is asserted about νf. The countable-choice hypothesis is the one inherited from the metric splitting of [F3] and from the canonical trivialization [F4]; no bundle metric, complement or frame is chosen in addition to those data.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources