Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Beurling–Ahlfors extension theorem for circles and lines

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let D be the unit disc (The unit disc, the upper half-plane, and Blaschke factors) and S1=∂D (Quasisymmetric homeomorphisms of the line and circle).

(a) Every orientation-preserving L-quasisymmetric homeomorphism h:S1→S1 extends to a K(L)-quasiconformal homeomorphism H of the sphere such that H(S1)=S1, H(D)=D, H(0)=0, and H∣S1=h. In particular, H∣D‾ is a homeomorphism of the closed disc onto itself and is quasiconformal on D.

(b) For every 0≤r<1 there is L(K,r)<∞ such that if an orientation-preserving K-quasiconformal sphere homeomorphism H maps D onto itself and ∣H(0)∣≤r, then H∣S1 is L(K,r)-quasisymmetric.

(c) Every orientation-preserving L-quasisymmetric homeomorphism h:R→R extends to a K(L)-quasiconformal sphere homeomorphism preserving R∪{∞} and fixing ∞. Conversely, if an orientation-preserving K-quasiconformal sphere homeomorphism H preserves R∪{∞} and fixes ∞, then one of H∣R and −H∣R is an increasing L(K)-quasisymmetric homeomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the line and circle quasisymmetry conventions, and the stated quasiconformal maps.

[F1]

For a circle homeomorphism, the quasisymmetric condition is the adjacent-equal-arc length bound; its equivalent metric form uses chordal distance. The line condition is the adjacent-equal-interval bound. On S1, the defined chordal distance equals Euclidean chord length (Quasisymmetric homeomorphisms of the line and circle).

[F2]

The Ahlfors–Beurling formula extends an increasing line-quasisymmetric map to a homeomorphism of H; reflection extends it to a quasiconformal sphere map preserving R∪{∞}. The formula is invariant under adding the same real translation to input and boundary data (The Ahlfors-Beurling extension formula for quasisymmetric maps of the line).

[F3]

If a∈D, Φa(z)=(z−a)/(1−a‾z) is a Möbius disc automorphism (its coefficient determinant is 1−∣a∣2>0), Φa(a)=0, and ∣Φa−1(0)∣=∣a∣ (Möbius transformations of the Riemann sphere). The boundary restrictions of Φa and Φa−1 have quasisymmetry constants bounded in terms of ∣a∣ (Quasisymmetric homeomorphisms of the line and circle).

[F4]

We use the analytic ACL/Sobolev convention for quasiconformality (The ACL and Sobolev analytic definition of quasiconformality). Its maximal dilatation is preserved by composition with conformal maps and by reflection in a conformal circle (Composition and inversion of quasiconformal maps and their Beltrami coefficients).

[F5]

The auxiliary Remark proves a global Euclidean quasisymmetry control for every analytic quasiconformal plane homeomorphism, depending only on its dilatation; its restriction to a compact round circle has the same chordal ratio control (Circular dilatation, quasisymmetry and the analytic definition).

[F6]

A continuous sphere homeomorphism that is K-quasiconformal on both sides of a round circle is K-quasiconformal on the sphere (Compact subsets of lines and round circles are removable for quasiconformal maps).

[F7]

AC implies Countable Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

Proof

technique · lift a circle map to a periodic line map, apply the explicit line extension, and descend the periodic extension through the exponential covering. For restriction, normalize the image of an interior point and reflect across the circle
1.1F1givenconstruct

Put T=2π and q(t)=eit. The continuous circle map t↦h(q(t)) has a continuous argument lift f:R→R: choose one argument at 0, subdivide each compact interval into finitely many pieces whose images lie in open semicircles, and match the local arguments at successive endpoints. Orientation preservation makes f strictly increasing. Since f(t+T)−f(t) is a continuous integer multiple of T, it is constant; strict increase and injectivity of h on the circle force that integer to be 1. Thus q(f(t))=h(q(t)) and f(t+T)=f(t)+T.

1.2F3F4F5F6given

Suppose H satisfies (b), and put a=H(0). The Möbius map Φa in [F3] makes F=Φa∘H fix 0 and map the closed disc to itself. By [F4], F is K-quasiconformal in the disc. Define its exterior extension by F~(z)=1/F(1/z‾)‾ for ∣z∣>1 and set F~=F on the closed disc. The formulas agree on S1; the pasted map is a sphere homeomorphism fixing 0 and ∞, and [F6] makes it K-quasiconformal. Apply [F5] to see that F~∣S1 is quasisymmetric with control depending only on K. The map Φa−1∣S1 has control depending only on r by [F3]. Composing these controls gives the claimed L(K,r) for H∣S1=Φa−1∘F~∣S1.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Let I=[x,x+s] and J=[x+s,x+2s]. If s≤T/2, their projections are adjacent equal arcs and their image-length ratio in either order is at most L. If T/2<s<T, put d=T−s, α=f(x+T)−f(x+s), and β=f(x+T−d)−f(x+T−2d). Then ∣f(I)∣=T−α and ∣f(J)∣=T−β. Each of α,β is the image length of an arc of length d<T/2; comparing it with an adjacent arc of the same length gives α,β≤LT/(L+1), since the two image lengths sum to at most T. Therefore both ∣f(I)∣ and ∣f(J)∣ lie in [T/(L+1),T]. If s≥T, write s=nT+u with integer n≥1 and 0≤u<T; each image increment lies in [nT,(n+1)T]. In every case the adjacent image-length ratio in either order is at most L+1, so f is (L+1)-quasisymmetric on R.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Apply [F2] to f, obtaining its reflected Ahlfors–Beurling extension G. The formula gives G(z+T)=G(z)+T: in the real average the boundary shift adds T, and in the imaginary difference it cancels. Thus H(eiz):=eiG(z) is well-defined on C∗. If H(eiz)=H(eiz′), then G(z′)=G(z)+nT=G(z+nT) for some integer n, so injectivity of G gives z′=z+nT; surjectivity follows from that of G. Hence H is a homeomorphism of C∗ and is K(L+1)-quasiconformal locally because the exponential covering is conformal. It maps the unit circle by h and maps the punctured disc onto itself.

4.1F2step 3.1algebraconstruct

The function p(t)=f(t)−t is continuous and T-periodic, so let M=sup⁡t∈[0,T]∣p(t)∣<∞. In the upper half-plane, the real part of the Ahlfors–Beurling formula differs from x by the average of p on [x−y,x+y], hence by at most M; its imaginary part differs from y by y−1∫0y(p(x+s)−p(x−s)) ds, hence by at most 2M. Reflection gives the same bound below the real axis. Therefore ∣G(z)−z∣≤5M throughout the plane. It follows that H(w)→0 as w→0 and H(w)→∞ as w→∞. The inverse of G has the same bounded-displacement property, so the descended map and its inverse both extend continuously at 0 and ∞; hence H is a sphere homeomorphism with H(0)=0.

5.1F2step 3.1step 4.1algebra

For y≥1, the derivative formulas for the line extension give P,Q=1+O(M/y) and R,S=1/2+O(M/y), where P,Q,R,S are the adjacent increments and average deficits in its proof. Thus DG is bounded on the upper region y≥1, and by reflection on y≤−1. In the coordinate w=eiz, ∣DH(w)∣≤e5M∣DG(z)∣ near 0, because ∣H(w)∣/∣w∣≤e5M; the analogous estimate in coordinate 1/w holds near ∞. The continuous map therefore has bounded classical derivatives off each added point. Integration by parts on a punctured disc and passage to the limit makes these bounded derivatives its weak derivatives across the point: the boundary term is bounded by a constant times the circle radius and tends to zero. The Beltrami inequality holds away from the point and hence almost everywhere across it. So the descended sphere homeomorphism is globally K(L+1)-quasiconformal.

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1

The map H from steps 3.1–5.1 proves (a), with K(L)=KAB(L+1). Since it preserves the two complementary components of S1, it maps D onto itself; continuity and bijectivity on the sphere give the asserted homeomorphism of the closed disc.

7.1F1F5F7given∎

The line-extension clause in (c) is [F2]. For the converse, H∣C is a plane quasiconformal homeomorphism fixing infinity, so [F5] gives a global quasisymmetry control on the plane. The restriction to R is either increasing or decreasing; in the latter case negate its values. Negation preserves every distance ratio, so restricting the plane metric control to triples on R gives the adjacent-interval ratio bound in [F1] for the resulting increasing homeomorphism, with a constant depending only on K. Countable Choice used by these analytic interfaces follows from AC by [F7].

Remarks

The unnormalized restriction assertion “K-quasiconformal and preserves S1 implies a uniform L(K) boundary constant” is false. For a∈(0,1), the Möbius disk automorphism Φa(z)=(z−a)/(1−az) is 1-quasiconformal and preserves S1, but the image-length ratio of the adjacent arcs [0,δ] and [δ,2δ] is unbounded as a↑1 for fixed 0<δ<π. This is why (b) includes ∣H(0)∣≤r<1. Likewise a sphere map preserving R∪{∞} need not restrict to a homeomorphism R→R unless it fixes ∞; z↦1/z is a Möbius example. The unnormalized converses in the scaffold are corrected accordingly.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources