Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

P5-free graphs admit a pure or x-sparse polynomial blockade

Statement

There exists d40 such that for every x(0,2d) and every P5-free graph G with V(G)xd, there exists an integer k[2,x1] and either

  1. a pure (k,V(G)/kd)-blockade in G; or
  2. an x-sparse (k,V(G)/kd)-blockade in G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: After the exponent d is chosen below, a parameter x(0,2d) and a P5-free graph G with V(G)xd.

[L1]

Lemma 5.5 of the cited source supplies an exponent D40 such that, under its convention allowing a real blockade-length threshold, there is some r[2,x1] and a pure or x-sparse (r,V(G)/rD)-blockade whenever x(0,2D) and V(G)xD.

[F2]

In this library, the first parameter of an (,w)-blockade must be a natural number, and the actual length is at least (Blockades, their length, their width, and their support).

Proof

technique · translate the cited source theorem
1.1

Let D40 be supplied by [L1], and set d:=2D. Fix x and G as in the Statement. Since dD, one has x<2D and V(G)xD. Thus [L1] gives a real r[2,x1] and a pure or x-sparse blockade whose actual length is at least r and whose width is at least V(G)/rD.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

Put k:=r. Then k is an integer and 2krx1. The blockade's integral actual length, being at least r, is in particular at least k, as required by [F2].

step 1.1F2algebra
3.1

Since k2 and kr<k+1, one has rD<(k+1)D(3k/2)Dk2D=kd. Consequently V(G)/rDV(G)/kd. The blockade from step 1.1 is therefore a pure or x-sparse (k,V(G)/kd)-blockade in the library's sense.

step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

The chosen d=2D satisfies d40, and steps 1.1--3.1 prove the stated conclusion for every admissible x and G.

step 1.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources