How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
-free graphs admit a pure or -sparse polynomial blockade
Statement
There exists such that for every and every -free graph with , there exists an integer and either
- a pure -blockade in ; or
- an -sparse -blockade in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: After the exponent is chosen below, a parameter and a -free graph with .
Lemma 5.5 of the cited source supplies an exponent such that, under its convention allowing a real blockade-length threshold, there is some and a pure or -sparse -blockade whenever and .
In this library, the first parameter of an -blockade must be a natural number, and the actual length is at least (Blockades, their length, their width, and their support).
Proof
Let be supplied by [L1], and set . Fix and as in the Statement. Since , one has and . Thus [L1] gives a real and a pure or -sparse blockade whose actual length is at least and whose width is at least .
Put . Then is an integer and . The blockade's integral actual length, being at least , is in particular at least , as required by [F2].
Since and , one has . Consequently . The blockade from step 1.1 is therefore a pure or -sparse -blockade in the library's sense.
The chosen satisfies , and steps 1.1--3.1 prove the stated conclusion for every admissible and .
Depends on
- Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that $P_n$ and $C_n$ have $n$ vertices
- $H$-free and $\mathcal F$-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention
- Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements
- Blockades, their length, their width, and their support
- Complete, anticomplete, pure, weakly sparse, and $x$-sparse blockades
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. VII. The five-vertex path, Lemma 5.5 (standard reference, not scraped)