Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local coefficient Lefschetz duality without choice

Statement

Let W be a compact oriented Hausdorff topological n-manifold with boundary A and a supplied boundary collar c:A×[0,1)→W. Let L be a local system of abelian groups. Cap with the integral relative orientation class z=[W,A] gives isomorphisms in every integer degree: Hp(W,A;L)→∼Hn−p(W;L),Hp(W;L)→∼Hn−p(W,A;L). The maps commute with every coefficient action commuting with transport, including noncommutative ring actions on the underlying abelian-group systems. No choice principle, smoothness, triangulation or finite CW structure is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The oriented compact manifold, supplied collar and abelian-group local system.

[F1]

Canonical support classes and the relative orientation class exist without choice; the boundary of z is the outward-normal-first orientation class [A]. The oriented assertion is the trivialized integral orientation-system case. Canonical twisted fundamental classes over compact subsets

[F2]

Compact-support duality holds on a boundaryless finite-atlas manifold, and ordinary duality holds on a compact oriented boundaryless manifold. Compact-support duality for finite-atlas manifolds without choice, Compact oriented manifold duality with local coefficients without choice

[F3]

Local pair sequences, excision, and homotopy invariance apply to abelian-group local systems by using the commutative base ring Z. Pair cochain connectors use the explicit zero extension on simplex functions. Pair exact sequences with local coefficients, Excision and Mayer–Vietoris with local coefficients, Functoriality with coefficient morphisms

[F4]

Local cap satisfies the cochain-first boundary formula and commutes with restriction and passage to relative groups; compact-support groups are the support colimit. Cup and cap products with local coefficients, Compactly supported cohomology with local coefficients

[F5]

The five lemma applies to commutative exact five-term windows. Five lemma for a morphism of long exact sequences

Proof

1.1F2F3givenconstructalgebra

If A is empty, both maps are [F2]'s compact duality, so assume it is nonempty. Put N=W∖A, Cd=c(A×[0,d)) and Kd=W∖Cd for 0<d<1/2. Every compact L⊂N lies in some Kd: intersect it with the closed compact collar segment of height at most 1/2; on the nonempty intersection the continuous height has a positive minimum since L misses A. Choose d below that minimum; if the intersection is empty any sufficiently small d works. Compactness supplies a finite atlas of W by ordinary and half-space charts. Restricting these charts to N gives a finite atlas by open Euclidean subsets. Thus [F2]'s finite-atlas duality applies to N. Pushing the collar inward with the function t↦t+εχ(t), where χ=1 near zero and vanishes before height 1/2 and ε>0 is small enough, gives a homotopy inverse to N↪W. Linear interpolation of this push gives the homotopies, stays inside the collar, and restricts to positive heights on N.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1constructalgebra

The collar deformation retraction Cd→A, its coefficient transports, and the exact pair sequences imply that Hp(W,Cd;L)→Hp(W,A;L) is an isomorphism. Excision identifies its domain with Hp(N,N∖Kd;L∣N). These maps commute with decreasing d. The cofinality of the Kd from step 1.1 and the representative definition of the support colimit therefore give a canonical isomorphism Hp(W,A;L)≅Hcp(N;L∣N). To verify independence, move two representatives to a common smaller collar core; the natural relative maps and common-support equality identify them there. This selects representatives for a single class only.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

By [F1], the image of z in Hn(W,Cd;Z) is the excision image of the support orientation class of N at Kd. A relative cocycle on (W,Cd) vanishes on Cd. Cap with two chains representing this equality differs by a boundary and by a cap term supported in Cd; the latter is zero. The cap boundary formula [F4] turns the former difference into a target boundary. Thus under step 2.1 the relative cap map on W is exactly compact-support cap on N followed by inclusion N↪W. Both maps are isomorphisms by step 1.1 and [F2], proving Hp(W,A;L)≅Hn−p(W;L).

4.1F1F2F3step 3.1constructalgebra

Compare the exact cohomology window Hp−1(A;L)→Hp(W,A;L)→Hp(W;L)→Hp(A;L)→Hp+1(W,A;L) with the homology window Hn−p(A;L)→Hn−p(W;L)→Hn−p(W,A;L)→Hn−p−1(A;L)→Hn−p−1(W;L). Use cap with [A] in the first and fourth vertical positions, the isomorphism of step 3.1 in the second and fifth, and cap with z in the middle. The boundary is compact and boundaryless, so its two cap maps are isomorphisms by [F2]. All rows are exact by [F3].

5.1F1F3F4F5step 4.1algebra

The two squares involving inclusions and relative quotients commute directly on the cap representatives. For the first connector square, extend a degree-(p−1) cocycle a on A by zero to a cochain a~ on W. The cap identity gives δa~∩z=a~∩∂z+(−1)p∂(a~∩z). Together with ∂z=[A] this proves the required square on homology. For the last connector square, a degree-p cocycle b gives ∂(b∩z)=(−1)pb∣A∩[A]. Multiplying that homology connector by (−1)p therefore makes the square commute. Multiplication by this unit preserves exactness. The signed ladder is now commutative, so [F5] and the four isomorphisms of step 4.1 prove the middle cap map is an isomorphism.

6.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 5.1algebra∎

The argument applies to arbitrary abelian-group fibers; it never lifts a cochain through a quotient of infinite products. The only cochain extension was the explicit zero extension for a subspace. Compactness supplies finitely many charts; all other operations use a single compact support or finitely many chains at a time. Any commuting scalar action commutes with cap, transport, extension and restriction, so all the maps and their inverses retain it. Empty manifolds, empty boundary, dimension zero, disconnected manifolds and all integer degrees obey the same formulas, with negative complexes zero. Hence the stated full coefficient and topological scope is obtained without a choice axiom.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources