Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Energy continuous dependence for the forced wave equation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let c>0, T>0 and let u∈C2 solve the forced equation □cu=f either on Rn×[0,T) or on U×[0,T) with U a bounded C1 domain and homogeneous Dirichlet boundary data; assume the total energy E(t)=∫Ωe(x,t) dx (with Ω=Rn, respectively Ω=U) is finite and continuous on [0,T), differentiable on (0,T) with the energy identity

E′(t)=(f(t),ut(t)):=∫Ωf(x,t)ut(x,t) dx,

which is what differentiating the energy and inserting The local wave-energy conservation law with vanishing boundary flux gives, and assume that t↦∥f(t)∥2 is continuous on [0,T) (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2). Then for every t∈[0,T)

2E(t)≤2E(0)+∫0t∥f(s)∥2 ds,henceE(t)1/2≤E(0)1/2+∫0t∥f(s)∥2 ds.

This is stability of the classical solution with the sharp Lt1Lx2 forcing constant, not only conservation; the second display uses 1/2≤1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω; a finite continuous energy E:[0,T)→[0,∞) with E′(t)=(f(t),ut(t)) on (0,T) and E(t)=12∥ut(t)∥22+c22∥Du(t)∥22; a continuous map t↦∥f(t)∥2. Write w(t):=∥f(t)∥2.

[F1]

Cauchy–Schwarz in L2: ∣∫gh dμ∣≤∥g∥2∥h∥2 for g,h∈L2(μ). (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

[F3]
[F4]

For every real α, s↦sα is continuous on (0,∞) and differentiable there with derivative αsα−1. (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers)

[F5]

First fundamental theorem: the integral function of a function continuous at a point has derivative equal to the integrand there. (The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive)

Proof

1.1givenF3F4algebra

The regularised energy: for ε>0 define φε(t):=2E(t)+ε2 on [0,T). The radicand is positive, so by the chain rule [F3] and the power rule [F4] with α=12, the function φε is continuous on [0,T) and differentiable on (0,T) with φε′(t)=2E′(t)22E(t)+ε2=(f(t),ut(t))φε(t).

2.1givenstep 1.1F1algebra

An upper bound for the derivative: by Cauchy–Schwarz [F1], (f(t),ut(t))≤∣(f(t),ut(t))∣≤∥f(t)∥2∥ut(t)∥2, and since 2E(t)=∥ut(t)∥22+c2∥Du(t)∥22≥∥ut(t)∥22 we have ∥ut(t)∥2≤2E(t)≤φε(t); hence φε′(t)≤∥f(t)∥2=w(t) for every t∈(0,T).

3.1givenstep 2.1F2F5F6algebra

Monotonicity of the defect: the function W(t):=∫0tw(s) ds is, by the continuity of w and [F6], the integral function of a continuous integrand, so by [F5] it is differentiable with W′=w; hence ψ:=φε−W is continuous on [0,T), differentiable on (0,T), and ψ′=φε′−w≤0 there by step 2.1; [F2] makes ψ nonincreasing, so for every t∈[0,T) one has φε(t)≤φε(0)+∫0tw(s) ds=2E(0)+ε2+∫0t∥f(s)∥2 ds.

4.1givenstep 3.1F4algebra∎

Letting ε↓0: by the continuity of the square root [F4] and 0≤E(t)<∞, φε(t)→2E(t) and φε(0)→2E(0), so the inequality of step 3.1 passes to the limit and gives 2E(t)≤2E(0)+∫0t∥f(s)∥2 ds; dividing by 2≥1 gives E(t)1/2≤E(0)1/2+∫0t∥f(s)∥2 ds.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

102 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources